“The pieces don’t assume a human audience or viewpoint—and they don’t aim to appeal to us, either.”
When speakers at Christian groups who say that they are open to honest discussion demean those with whom they disagree, I object.
Another friend is impressed with Werner’s ability to draw out the huge problems with many current claims: “I don’t know how he does it.” Part 1 interview with Dr. Carl Werner Part 2 interview with Dr. Carl Werner Part 3 interview with Dr. Carl Werner
For example: People pay more attention to data that concur with their own personal theories.
Let’s hope Craig’s team offers to debate him on the points he raises, as long as Craig is allowed to raise others later, like the widely doubted plausibility of ultra-Darwinism.
Not what was confidently predicted by consensus science two decades ago.
Dr. Crocker was summoned by her department head, accused of teaching creationism despite a singular lack of written even one complaint
So this is best seen as a temporary setback for the social engineers who could never build an Internet and can’t give up on the dream of controlling one.
“The remarkable compensation in brain functional networks that we found here may thus have important implications “
Also “taken aback” by the synchronicity.
“It seems that reionisation must have happened quicker than astronomers previously thought.”
Even a meeting of elite minds at Europe’s top particle physics lab couldn’t do it.
The genetic material is the harder problem; the chemistry is just more complicated.
“I still contend that we sell bacteria short of their full potential (think that we have arrived and they’re still up and coming).”
From “Preventing Dangerous Nonsense in Human Gene Expression” (ScienceDaily, Oct. 14, 2011), we learn: Human genes are preferentially encoded by codons that are less likely to be mistranscribed (or “misread”) into a STOP codon. This finding by Brian Cusack and colleagues from the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics in Berlin and the CNRS in Read More…