agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Darwinist rhetorical tactics Food for thought Logic and First Principles of right reason Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare Naturalism popular science and science education Science, worldview issues/foundations and society Selective Hyperskepticism

Revealing in-thread exchanges on the imposition of evo mat scientism/ naturalism (and on the tactics to deflect attention from that)

The imposition of evolutionary materialistic scientism (aka naturalism) is one of the key issues driving the march of folly in our civilisation. It is also very difficult to discuss as there are some very powerful rhetorical deflectors at work. Sometimes, then, the best thing we can do is to clip from one of UD’s exchanges […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Culture Darwinist rhetorical tactics Food for thought Geo-strategic issues Governance & control vs anarchy Logic and First Principles of right reason Politics/policy and origins issues Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

The propagandist’s paradise . . .

is our ruinous nightmare. This can be seen through a game, from the conspiracism thread: KF, 86: >> . . . there is a silly little mental game we can consider. [The Crooked Yardstick Effect:] Step one, define that a certain crooked yardstick, S, is the standard of straight, accurate and upright. Once that is […]

academic freedom agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Darwinist rhetorical tactics Free Speech Freedom Geo-strategic issues Governance & control vs anarchy Intelligent Design Media Politics/policy and origins issues

ID vs the shadow-censoring (“shadow-banning”) digital empires, 2

ID is a proposition that, first, it is reasonable to inquire scientifically as to whether certain features of the world of life and/or the physical cosmos can or do show observable signs of design. To which, the answer has long since been given, e.g. by the well known OoL researcher Orgel in a significant 1973 […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Correcting trollish fallacies Darwinist rhetorical tactics Food for thought Free Speech Freedom General interest Geo-strategic issues Governance & control vs anarchy Intellectual freedom Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare UD Newswatch highlights

The ID issue vs Digital Empire/Cartel concerns: information utilities/ “superhighway” vs shadow-censoring, de-platforming information gatekeepers

The ID issue has long been a focal point for intense, often deeply polarised debate on our origins and world roots as informed by science. Science, being a major source of knowledge and understanding about our world, which also energises technological innovation and economic growth. Science is often treated as though it is the grounds […]

academic freedom agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Epistemology (the study of knowledge and its conditions) Logic and First Principles of right reason Science science education Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

What about the broader view of naturalism? (And how does this tie in with methods of science?)

A handy source on the broader view of naturalism (as a bit more elaborate than a dictionary and a tad more credible than Wikipedia) is Encyclopedia Britannica: >>Naturalism, in philosophy, a theory that relates scientific method to philosophy by affirming that all beings and events in the universe (whatever their inherent character may be) are […]

academic freedom agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Epistemology (the study of knowledge and its conditions) Informatics Naturalism science education Science, worldview issues/foundations and society warrant, knowledge, science and belief

On the absurdity of “naturalism” (and the equal absurdity of its censorship of science and education)

A little while ago, UD’s News noted on the tenth anniversary of Louisiana’s science education law, and an exchange has developed on the significance of “methodological” and “philosophical” “naturalism” in science, education — and by implication society. A crucial issue is the July 2000 statement of the US National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) on science […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Darwinism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Eugenics etc Evolutionary materialism's amorality Politics/policy and origins issues popular science and science education Racism Science, worldview issues/foundations and society Selective Hyperskepticism

A note on eugenics, social darwinism and evolutionary theory

Notoriously, the Second International Congress on Eugenics [1921] defined Eugenics as the self-direction of human evolution and saw eugenics as applied evolutionary science with intellectual, logical and factual roots in several linked branches of science, medicine and scholarship. If you doubt this, simply examine the logo to the right. Perhaps the best summary of the […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Darwinist rhetorical tactics Epistemology (the study of knowledge and its conditions) Logic and First Principles of right reason Mathematics reason Selective Hyperskepticism warrant, knowledge, science and belief

Why is the objectivity of Mathematics an important (& ID-relevant) question?

In recent days, I have taken time to show that while subjects study the logic of structure and quantity (= Mathematics, in a nutshell), the body of knowledge — including axiomatised systems — is objective. Where, “objective” effectively means, tied to such a body of accountable warrant and to foundational self-evident facts that the substance […]

academic freedom agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games brains and computation vs contemplation Darwinist rhetorical tactics Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality Food for thought Geo-strategic issues Governance & control vs anarchy Logic and First Principles of right reason Philosophy Politics/policy and origins issues Selective Hyperskepticism

Is it time to “reboot” our formal and informal education in ethics, to save our civilisation?

On reflecting on the ongoing discussion on ethical matters (as part of the science and worldviews in society theme of UD) in the thread in response to Sev on moral truth, I suggest yes. Not least, because the already in progress, suicidal moral bankruptcy of our civilisation will take down science, math, technology, sound governance […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Answering the problem of evil (vs good) Darwinist rhetorical tactics Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Governance & control vs anarchy Logic and First Principles of right reason Philosophy Politics/policy and origins issues Selective Hyperskepticism

Responding to Sev: “Moral claims are not about what is but about how we ought to behave, primarily towards one another. They are not capable of being either true or false”

Again, it is vital for us to see what today’s evolutionary materialism, scientism, athiestical advocates and fellow travellers are thinking in their own words, and we must answer them on the merits. Where, as captioned, it is being argued in the intersubjective consensus thread, that there is no such thing as moral truth. This means, […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Answering the problem of evil (vs good) Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Evolutionary materialism's amorality

Answering AK: “who determines who is in the right? From my reading of your words, you obviously do not brook the possibility that you may be wrong.”

Where, of course, the very first self-evident, plumbline truth I have stressed is this: error exists. (The crucial diagnostically decisive error of cultural relativism here being exposed by the reference to WHO determines, rather than WHAT defines and determines the truth and the right.) It is one thing when we of UD say that we […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Darwinist rhetorical tactics Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality Logic and First Principles of right reason Philosophy popular science and science education Science, Mathematics, Philosophy and (Natural) Theology Selective Hyperskepticism

Sev, JDK, the value of philosophy [esp. metaphysics] and addressing the intersubjective consensus challenge

In the PZM on the state of atheism thread, some key fundamental issues have emerged: JDK, 12: >>to both ba[77] and kf: because I think your belief in the power and importance of metaphysical philosophy is excessive and misguided . . . >> Sev, 17: >>[to BA77,] You consistently ignore the possibility that a consensus […]

academic freedom agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Darwinist rhetorical tactics Education Food for thought Governance & control vs anarchy Logic and First Principles of right reason Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare popular science and science education Selective Hyperskepticism

GUN, UD News, Wikipedia and the sources credibility question

It has been said that 99% of practical arguments rely on authorities, i.e. sources. We can start with dictionaries, parents, teachers, officials, records and serious writings, or even the news and punditry we all follow. (And yes, this paragraph is a case in point, here, C S Lewis making a general point; which I amplified.) […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Correcting trollish fallacies Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Food for thought Freedom Geo-strategic issues Governance & control vs anarchy Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare Philosophy Politics/policy and origins issues Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

CT4: AK on morality: “Since the moral fabric is man made, all we are doing is seeing it change . . .”

Sometimes, one of our frequent objectors has a truly noteworthy letting- the- cat- out- of- the- bag moment that is worth headlining. In the still live CT2 thread, AK unwittingly exposes the incoherence and implied amorality of atheistical, evolutionary materialism when he comments in key part: AK, 80: >>Since the moral fabric is man made, […]