agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Answering the problem of evil (vs good) Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Defending our Civilization Evolutionary materialism's amorality governance Laws Lessons of History Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare Selective Hyperskepticism

Does The Bible “condone” slavery, even as Darwin opposed it?

It seems, this issue is on the table here at UD again, and it needs to be publicly corrected for record. As a first step, I link a discussion in response to the oppression thesis used to try to discredit and marginalise the historical contribution of the Christian faith (and to create the false impression […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Answering the problem of evil (vs good) Atheism Correcting trollish fallacies Darwinist rhetorical tactics Defending our Civilization Evolutionary materialism's amorality FYI-FTR

FYI-FTR: The answer given to attempts to undermine moral government (and to those that — even worse — suggest that Christians must become/are vigilantes)

A new accusatory talking point being used by one particular frequent objector, is that I am ducking answering what he imagines I cannot answer. This arose in connexion with his drearily raising yet again an obsessive theme that would drag threads into the sewer. Having taken time to deal with such in one thread, I […]

Answering the problem of evil (vs good) Atheism Ethics Eugenics etc Evolutionary materialism's amorality Logic and First Principles of right reason Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

Logic & First Principles, 16: The problem of playing God (when we don’t — cannot — know how)

In discussing the attempted brain hacking of monkeys, I made a comment about refraining from playing God. This sparked a sharp reaction, then led to an onward exchange. This puts on the table the captioned issue . . . which it seems to me is properly part of our ongoing logic and first principles reflections. […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Darwinism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Eugenics etc Evolutionary materialism's amorality Politics/policy and origins issues popular science and science education Racism Science, worldview issues/foundations and society Selective Hyperskepticism

A note on eugenics, social darwinism and evolutionary theory

Notoriously, the Second International Congress on Eugenics [1921] defined Eugenics as the self-direction of human evolution and saw eugenics as applied evolutionary science with intellectual, logical and factual roots in several linked branches of science, medicine and scholarship. If you doubt this, simply examine the logo to the right. Perhaps the best summary of the […]

academic freedom agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games brains and computation vs contemplation Darwinist rhetorical tactics Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality Food for thought Geo-strategic issues Governance & control vs anarchy Logic and First Principles of right reason Philosophy Politics/policy and origins issues Selective Hyperskepticism

Is it time to “reboot” our formal and informal education in ethics, to save our civilisation?

On reflecting on the ongoing discussion on ethical matters (as part of the science and worldviews in society theme of UD) in the thread in response to Sev on moral truth, I suggest yes. Not least, because the already in progress, suicidal moral bankruptcy of our civilisation will take down science, math, technology, sound governance […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Answering the problem of evil (vs good) Darwinist rhetorical tactics Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Governance & control vs anarchy Logic and First Principles of right reason Philosophy Politics/policy and origins issues Selective Hyperskepticism

Responding to Sev: “Moral claims are not about what is but about how we ought to behave, primarily towards one another. They are not capable of being either true or false”

Again, it is vital for us to see what today’s evolutionary materialism, scientism, athiestical advocates and fellow travellers are thinking in their own words, and we must answer them on the merits. Where, as captioned, it is being argued in the intersubjective consensus thread, that there is no such thing as moral truth. This means, […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Answering the problem of evil (vs good) Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Evolutionary materialism's amorality

Answering AK: “who determines who is in the right? From my reading of your words, you obviously do not brook the possibility that you may be wrong.”

Where, of course, the very first self-evident, plumbline truth I have stressed is this: error exists. (The crucial diagnostically decisive error of cultural relativism here being exposed by the reference to WHO determines, rather than WHAT defines and determines the truth and the right.) It is one thing when we of UD say that we […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Darwinist rhetorical tactics Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality Logic and First Principles of right reason Philosophy popular science and science education Science, Mathematics, Philosophy and (Natural) Theology Selective Hyperskepticism

Sev, JDK, the value of philosophy [esp. metaphysics] and addressing the intersubjective consensus challenge

In the PZM on the state of atheism thread, some key fundamental issues have emerged: JDK, 12: >>to both ba[77] and kf: because I think your belief in the power and importance of metaphysical philosophy is excessive and misguided . . . >> Sev, 17: >>[to BA77,] You consistently ignore the possibility that a consensus […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Correcting trollish fallacies Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Food for thought Freedom Geo-strategic issues Governance & control vs anarchy Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare Philosophy Politics/policy and origins issues Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

CT4: AK on morality: “Since the moral fabric is man made, all we are doing is seeing it change . . .”

Sometimes, one of our frequent objectors has a truly noteworthy letting- the- cat- out- of- the- bag moment that is worth headlining. In the still live CT2 thread, AK unwittingly exposes the incoherence and implied amorality of atheistical, evolutionary materialism when he comments in key part: AK, 80: >>Since the moral fabric is man made, […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Constitution Courts Darwinist rhetorical tactics Evolutionary materialism's amorality governance Intellectual freedom Intelligent Design Logic and First Principles of right reason popular science and science education Selective Hyperskepticism

Can Wikipedia be fixed? (And, should we care? [Is it time to walk away and lock it out like a virus?])

By 2012, the longstanding Encyclopedia Britannica had published its last print edition. Microsoft’s Encarta has long since bitten the dust, and so has Collier’s notable effort. Wikipedia, like it or lump it — mostly the latter — seems to have taken over that go-to first source slot. Indeed, for a great many subjects a Wikipedia […]

Animal minds Artificial Intelligence Atheism brains and computation vs contemplation Darwinist rhetorical tactics Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Food for thought Humor Lessons of History Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

BA77 links on the consequences of mind = brain ideologies

While we’re on a roll on AI and its import at the hands of evolutionary materialistic scientism dressed in a lab coat, BA77 has linked a comic strip — see here (main site here; cf. twist on The Cave currently top of the heap) — that is at first funny then soberingly serious: As in, […]

Constitution Courts Culture Embryology Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality UD Newswatch highlights

2018 March for Life in Washington, DC: 45th annual response to the 1973 Abortion on Demand US Supreme Court Decision

Today is the March for life in Washington DC. Speakers include: Rep. Paul Ryan, Pam Tebow, Matt Birk and others. We have someone on the ground from the UD family and will be giving updates as we get them across the day. Remember, globally, the abortion holocaust toll rises at a million or thereabouts per […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality Geo-strategic issues governance Media Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare Selective Hyperskepticism UD Newswatch highlights UD's Sci-Tech watch You're a Nazi/fascist/racist/fundy/creationist etc

Is Technology a new religion? (And if so, what is happening at Temple Google?)

AFP tells us regarding the current Consumer Electronics Show (CES): >>Tech is the new religion, offering hope of salvation in a troubled world as industry leaders converge in Las Vegas this week. Technology will not just help us communicate better and give us bolder and brighter screens. It is promising to end urban congestion, treat […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality Governance & control vs anarchy Lessons of History Logic and First Principles of right reason Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare Politics/policy and origins issues Selective Hyperskepticism You're a Nazi/fascist/racist/fundy/creationist etc

Can morals be grounded as objective knowledge (and are some moral principles self-evident)?

In a current thread, objector JS writes: >>ALL morals that we have, regardless of the source, regardless of whether they are objective or subjective, are filtered through humans. As such, we can never be absolutely sure that they are free from error. All of your “moral governance”, “reasoning and responsibility“, “self referential”, “IS-OUGHT” talking points […]