Atheism Epistemology (the study of knowledge and its conditions) evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Fine tuning Intelligent Design Logic and First Principles of right reason Mathematics

Logic and First Principles, 13: The challenge of creeping scientism (and of linked nominalism)

There is a creeping scientism in our intellectual climate. We have been led to think that Science is the gold standard of reliable, substantial knowledge and that institutional science and its leaders are the curators of knowledge. This is of course deeply connected to the wider domination of evolutionary materialistic scientism, which compounds the above […]

Artificial Intelligence brains and computation vs contemplation evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Science, worldview issues/foundations and society Selective Hyperskepticism warrant, knowledge, science and belief

Sev’s IOU on how conscious mind will be explained on materialistic premises

In the Eugene Wigner thread, frequent objector Sev argues to BA77: Sev, 23: >>Yes, the hard problem of consciousness is explaining what it is and how it arises from the physical brain and we don’t have such an explanation as yet. The evidence for consciousness arising from the brain lies in the strong correlation between […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Answering the problem of evil (vs good) Darwinist rhetorical tactics Ethics Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Governance & control vs anarchy Logic and First Principles of right reason Philosophy Politics/policy and origins issues Selective Hyperskepticism

Responding to Sev: “Moral claims are not about what is but about how we ought to behave, primarily towards one another. They are not capable of being either true or false”

Again, it is vital for us to see what today’s evolutionary materialism, scientism, athiestical advocates and fellow travellers are thinking in their own words, and we must answer them on the merits. Where, as captioned, it is being argued in the intersubjective consensus thread, that there is no such thing as moral truth. This means, […]

agit-prop, opinion manipulation and well-poisoning games Correcting trollish fallacies Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Food for thought Freedom Geo-strategic issues Governance & control vs anarchy Media Manipulation, Agit-Prop &/or Lawfare Philosophy Politics/policy and origins issues Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

CT4: AK on morality: “Since the moral fabric is man made, all we are doing is seeing it change . . .”

Sometimes, one of our frequent objectors has a truly noteworthy letting- the- cat- out- of- the- bag moment that is worth headlining. In the still live CT2 thread, AK unwittingly exposes the incoherence and implied amorality of atheistical, evolutionary materialism when he comments in key part: AK, 80: >>Since the moral fabric is man made, […]

Animal minds Artificial Intelligence Atheism brains and computation vs contemplation Darwinist rhetorical tactics Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Food for thought Humor Lessons of History Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

BA77 links on the consequences of mind = brain ideologies

While we’re on a roll on AI and its import at the hands of evolutionary materialistic scientism dressed in a lab coat, BA77 has linked a comic strip — see here (main site here; cf. twist on The Cave currently top of the heap) — that is at first funny then soberingly serious: As in, […]

Atheism Culture Darwinist rhetorical tactics Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

Dan Brown tries the Science disproves/dismisses God trick

As Breitbart (as a handy source) reports: >>“Historically, no god has survived science. Gods evolved,” the best-selling American novelist said at the Frankfurt Book Fair, where he unveiled his newest book, “Origin”. The fifth instalment in the wildly popular series that started with “The Da Vinci Code” tracks Harvard professor Robert Langdon’s latest code-cracking adventure […]

Atheism Back to Basics of ID Darwinist rhetorical tactics evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

RVB8 tries to dismiss ID as failed science

. . . with yet another list of talking points.  Namely: >>The irony of a scientific idea, ‘Intelligent Design’, with no experimentation? The irony of a scientific idea, ‘Intelligent Design’, with no predictive qualities? The irony of a scientific idea, Intelligent Design’, that refuses to identify, or even look for, the Designer? My scientific idea […]

Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Design inference evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Food for thought Functionally Specified Complex Information & Organization Intelligent Design

FFT: TJG ponders the design inference- objecting mindset

. . . through a case in point: >>tjguyApril 12, 2017 at 2:28 am rvb8 @2 Thank god (heh:), the obvious has been consigned to the rubbish bin of understanding, and we now prefer evidence, experimentation, and the unobvious, to the vacuous, empty, ‘obvious’. What is the problem with this way of thinking? He just […]

brains and computation vs contemplation evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Human evolution Intellectual freedom Logic and First Principles of right reason Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

Dilbert’s Scott Adams and the reproductively effective delusion evolutionary thesis

Sometimes, popular debates and commenters can put their fingers on a key issue, almost in passing. In this case, in addressing the cognitive dissonance issue triggering  many reactions to the rise of Donald Trump to US President-Elect (I confess, my own surprise* . . . ) Dilbert’s Scott Adams has dropped a real clanger of […]

Back to Basics of ID Darwinist rhetorical tactics evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Functionally Specified Complex Information & Organization Intelligent Design Logic and First Principles of right reason Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

BTB, Answering the “ID is Religion/Creationism in a cheap tuxedo” talking point

For many years, atheistical objectors — often, taking a cue from ruthless advocacy groups such as the NCSE and/or ACLU etc — have been tempted to dismiss ID as “Religion” or “Creationism,” and this long since answered point still occasionally crops up here at UD. (Unfortunately, even when it is not explicit, it is often […]

Darwinist rhetorical tactics Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification governance Politics/policy and origins issues Science, worldview issues/foundations and society Selective Hyperskepticism

Where do you get the notion there likely have been 800+ million abortions in 40 years from?

In a current thread that is nominally on the latest allegedly earth-like exoplanet, predictably that is where distractors will come up on things like: >>[RVB8, 21:] “800 million (unusual figure) unborn aborted fetuses. Perhaps this is true, it’s certainly true abortions have occured, and probably happen at a faster rate now becuse of the ‘day […]

Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification Politics/policy and origins issues Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

Plato’s Socrates on navigating the ship of state

In the past few weeks at UD, we have seen abundant indicators on how: a –> we are in a time of obvious, deeply polarised ideological confrontation in our civilisation [in material part, driven by cultural marxist agendas and stratagems], b –> we are forced to give unwelcome counsel in the face of an obvious […]

Atheism Darwinist rhetorical tactics Evolutionary materialism's amorality evolutionary materialism's self-falsification FYI-FTR Politics/policy and origins issues Science, worldview issues/foundations and society

FYI-FTR: Conscience is a gift

In a recent exchange with BA in the WJM arguing thread, CF inadvertently revealed that he too knows or should know and acknowledge, that there is an oughtness towards truth. This is not unexpected, given the core moral self evident truths. For instance, we can see the first cycle: >>1] The first self evident moral […]