Human evolution
Max Planck Institute: You could buy tools like the Neanderthals used off the Internet today
Jeff Tomkins’ new book at amazon More than a Monkey: the Human Chimp DNA Similarity Myth
In a previous thread I summarized geneticist Jeff Tomkins findings that demonstrates human DNA is not 98% similar to chimps but more on the order of 70% (and even that is a generous estimate). Tomkins has a book out that goes into the details I sketched out here. More Than a Monkey NOTES: photo credits: Amazon.com
Why “science” can’t and doesn’t explain monogamy
Neanderthal leather-working tools at 40,000 mya resemble modern ones
Human race evolving new capabilities due to rapid population growth?
Ancient calendar found in Scotland predates earliest known by 5000 years
Satel: Brain-based findings don’t determine irresistible criminality
Monogamy files: Why the researchers didn’t want to discuss humans
Tolerance of milk key to Europe’s early history?
About those three human groups that supposedly happened in 150 years …
Darwin explains why women live longer than female apes
“Two simulations reach opposing conclusions about why monogamy evolved in primates”
Human sacrifice from over five thousand years ago?
With no dictionary tricks, humans only 70% similar to chimps
Former professor of genetics at Clemson, Jeffrey Tomkins points out humans and chimps potentially have only 70% similarity. But this bold claim is at variance with the popularly reported similarity of 98%? How can this be? Recall the “dictionary trick” whereby Tom Wolfe’s famous novel The Right Stuff can be shown to be almost 100% identical to a dictionary merely by aligning the words in Wolfe’s novel against identical words in the dictionary. The illusion of similarity is brought about by a total disregard for sentence structure and context of the words within sentences, paragraphs, and chapters. When those considerations are taken into account, it becomes preposterous to assert The Right Stuff is almost 100% identical to a dictionary. But Read More ›