Catholics and intelligent design: Jay Richards’ response to Ed Feser

_{Denyse O'Leary

April 8, 2011

Evolutionary psychology}

Share: Facebook; Twitter; LinkedIn; Flipboard; Print; Email

Pro-design Jay Richards has responded to neo-Thomist Ed Feser’s attack on evidence for design in nature.

Also: “Thomas Aquinas as ancient evolutionary psychologist”

Comments

Hi StephenB, Do you think a mechanistic universe is compatible with both Thomism and ID?Mung_{April 14, 2011
April
04
Apr
14
14
2011
03:16 PM
3
03
16
PM
PDT}

News, thanks for passing this along. I have read "God and Evolution," and I appreciate Richards' comprehensive discussion on the matter. It is rather interesting that so many of Feser's latest objections are mere repetitions of the same points that Richards has already refuted in the book. Because Aquinas is the official philosopher for Catholics, it is essential that they understand the critical point: Thomism and ID are compatible, in spite of Feser's and Beckwith's false arguments to the contrary.StephenB_{April 10, 2011
April
04
Apr
10
10
2011
10:36 AM
10
10
36
AM
PDT}

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Leave a Reply