Probably, with possible exception of Mike Gene. My good friend and colleague Casey Luskin writes: ID offers a strong positive argument, based on finding in nature the type of information and complexity that, in our experience, comes from intelligence alone. I will explain this positive argument further in Part B of this article. Those who claim ID is nothing more than a negative argument against evolution are misrepresenting ID. – ID uses a positive argument based upon finding high levels of complex and specified information. http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/08/what_is_the_the075281.html#sthash.D6IZUcb1.dpuf I rarely disagree with Casey Luskin, and Casey echoes the majority view of ID, and I’m clearly in the minority to disagree with him. However, “positive argument of ID” in some people’s view would … Continue reading Am I the only ID proponent that doesn’t like the phrase “positive case for ID”?