Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Playing With Truth

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
I used to believe facts and figures counted. I thought that objective, obvious evidence would carry the day. But evolutionists have long since dispelled such silly notions for me. In one public debate with a professor, I read through a dozen or so objective, scientific failures of evolution. With a wave of the hand the professor easily dismissed the entire list. “Those,” he assured the audience, “are all fallacies.” It later became obvious he hadn’t the foggiest idea of what he was talking about.  Read more
Comments
So, now we have "Post-Normal Science." http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/05/postmodernism_a_unified_theory.htmlriddick
May 2, 2010
May
05
May
2
02
2010
06:42 AM
6
06
42
AM
PDT
As usual, I find Dr. Hunter's posts to be both refreshing and stimulating. We can be reasonably certain that undirected, naturalistic forces did not drive the evolutionary process. What we don't know, as a matter of historical fact, is how much evolution actually occurred. In the final analysis, the only thing we know for sure is that things changed and that things change.StephenB
May 1, 2010
May
05
May
1
01
2010
10:26 AM
10
10
26
AM
PDT
See if this link works for you PaV: Playing With Truth http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2010/05/playing-with-truth.html#commentsbornagain77
May 1, 2010
May
05
May
1
01
2010
08:41 AM
8
08
41
AM
PDT
Everytime I hit "Read more", I get an article on "Stickle-Back Fishes and Confirmation Bias". When I try to go to "Home", I get the same article back. Is it my computer, or is it your website, Cornelius?PaV
May 1, 2010
May
05
May
1
01
2010
08:35 AM
8
08
35
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply