Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Gain of function in a German cockroach?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

A North Carolina State University research team has reported that a mutant strain of German cockroaches have gained a new biological function over the last 20 years: they have developed the capacity to perceive sugar as bitter, enabling them to avoid sugar-coated cockroach traps and increase their chances of survival.

The research team’s original report, which is titled, Changes in Taste Neurons Support the Emergence of an Adaptive Behavior in Cockroaches was jointly authored by Ayako Wada-Katsumata, Jules Silverman, and Coby Schal and was published last week in Science magazine (24 May 2013: Vol. 340 no. 6135 pp. 972-975, DOI: 10.1126/science.1234854).

Science reporter Victoria Gill summarized the scientists’ findings in a BBC News report (Cockroaches lose their ‘sweet tooth’ to evade traps, 24 May 2013):

A strain of cockroaches in Europe has evolved to outsmart the sugar traps used to eradicate them.

American scientists found that the mutant cockroaches had a “reorganised” sense of taste, making them perceive the glucose used to coat poisoned bait not as sweet but rather as bitter…

The scientists immobilised the cockroaches and used tiny electrodes to record the activity of taste receptors – cells that respond to flavour that are “housed” in microscopic hairs on the insects’ mouthparts.

“The cells that normally respond to bitter compounds were responding to glucose in these [mutant] cockroaches,” said Dr Schal.

“So they’re perceiving glucose to be a bitter compound.

“The sweet-responding cell does also fire, but the bitter compound actually inhibits it – so the end result is that bitterness overrides sweetness.”

So it actually seems as if natural selection has changed the way flies perceive tastes, in the short space of 20 years:

…Dr Elli Leadbeater from the Institute of Zoology in London said the work was exciting.

“In the cockroach case, sugar actually tastes bitter – an effective way for natural selection to quickly produce cockroaches that won’t accept the sugar baits that hide poison.”

A recent report by Joseph Nordqvist in Medical News Today explains the mechanism of the changes (Cockroaches Are Evolving To Evade Sugar Traps, 25 May 2013):

Cockroaches have tiny little hair-like sensors on their mouths which they use to “taste” food, activating sensors house gustatory receptor neurons, or GRNs. Certain GRNs activate in the presence of food that is sugary – which makes them feed – as opposed to GRNs that activate in the presence of food that is bitter – making the animal avoid the food…

The research, which started in the mid-1980s, found that German cockroaches given baits incorporating a stimulant (glucose) and a deterrent (insecticide) evolved a behavioral change called “glucose aversion”.

What the scientists found was that the mutant German cockroaches which displayed glucose aversion were given sugar, it actually stimulated their bitter taste response and suppressed their “sweet” response, which prevented them from feeding. The scientists were amazed to observe that when the mutant cockroaches tasted sugary foods such as jam, they actually jumped back, as if they’d been electrocuted. The mutants preferred to eat peanut butter, instead.

The evolutionary significance of this discovery is quite profound. To quote Nordqvist’s report again:

Corresponding author Coby Schal, the Blanton J. Whitmire Distinguished Professor of Entomology at North Carolina State, said:

Most times, genetic changes, or mutations, cause the loss of function. In this case, the mutation resulted in the gain of a new function – triggering bitter receptors when glucose is introduced. This gives the cockroach a new behavior which is incredibly adaptive. These roaches just got ahead of us in the arms race.”

I think it’s fair to say that a new kind of behavior which aids survival deserves to be called a gain of function. So, does this mean that Darwinian evolution is capable of generating new functions over the short space of 20 years? Not so fast. There’s another possibility: maybe the capacity lay dormant in the cockroaches’ genes all along (don’t forget, they’ve been around for 400 million tears):

Schal noted that it is also possible that the environmental adaptation could have started millions of years ago – before humans were around – when they avoided some plants that are capable of producing toxic, but sweet, compounds.

That’s an avenue of investigation that definitely sounds worth checking out.

One thing is quite clear: if the gain of function is confirmed, it would be the first of its kind in Nature, according to a report by Amina Khan (Los Angeles Times, 24 May 2013) (Scientists uncover a secret to cockroaches’ adaptability):

Losing a function in sight or taste is not uncommon in the animal kingdom — in fact, many marine mammals have lost their ability to taste sweet things, perhaps because they don’t encounter it in their fishy diet. But adding sensory information — setting off a “bitter” alarm for a sweet food — is another story.

It’s incredibly rare” Schal said. “We don’t know any other example where instead of having a loss of function, you had a gain of a new function — and that’s what happened in this cockroach.”

ID Critics often complain that Intelligent Design theory doesn’t make scientific predictions, so I’ll invite readers to weigh in here. What predictions would you make about the genes of German cockroaches, on the basis of this discovery?

Over to you.

Comments
For a creationist response to this news release check out CEH Roach bait story highlights abuse of word "evolution". This is of course not the type of change you need to get a roach from a one felled creature.tjguy
May 26, 2013
May
05
May
26
26
2013
09:57 PM
9
09
57
PM
PDT
When I read this blog entry I thought first about the title of Thomas Nagel essay: “What is it like to be a bat?” and how come these scientists were able to know how it is to be a (German) cockroach – and even have the arrogance to judge its tastes? You know: de gustibus non est disputandum (in my translation from Latin: “the tastes should not be discussed”). Going above this first level of inquiry, I wonder if there were some other possible scenarios that – based on what transpired here – were not considered by the scientists. For example, what about if there was a strain of German cockroaches that from the beginning didn’t like sugar in the same manner as some of us do not like broccoli? Or, alternatively, from the beginning they didn’t like the poison intended to kill them? Then when the people started using poison-coated sugar to exterminate German cockroaches this strain was the single surviving kind. See for example Behe’s explanation in ‘The Edge of Evolution’ why individuals with sickle-cell anemia are resistant to malaria. I am not sure if this is the same point that Bilbo tried to make at # 2 above.InVivoVeritas
May 26, 2013
May
05
May
26
26
2013
09:32 PM
9
09
32
PM
PDT
Sugar tastes bitter but fortunately garbage still tastes oh so sweet- unless of course there's sugar in it....Joe
May 26, 2013
May
05
May
26
26
2013
08:01 AM
8
08
01
AM
PDT
That is only adaptation (micro-evolution). I predict the mutants will evolve adapt to dislike peanut butter in the next 20 years!Babamar
May 26, 2013
May
05
May
26
26
2013
06:22 AM
6
06
22
AM
PDT
Didn't cockroaches already have the bitter reaction behavior? The only thing "new" was that the glucose now elicited the same behavior, right? So how is that a gain of function? It sounds like more of a modification of function. But why quibble? Whether it's a gain of function or a modification of function, I still predict that in the chain of mutations leading to the new behavior that there were never two or more adjacent unselected mutations.Bilbo I
May 26, 2013
May
05
May
26
26
2013
04:47 AM
4
04
47
AM
PDT
I'll predict that there was never more than one unselected (U) mutation before there was a selected (S) mutation. Thus: U+S, or S+U+S, or U+S+U+S, etc., but never U+U+S, or S+U+U+S, etc.Bilbo I
May 26, 2013
May
05
May
26
26
2013
04:36 AM
4
04
36
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply