Darwin’s Dilemma presumably references the sudden Cambrian explosion of complex, multicellular life forms, including vertebrates, the creatures most likely to have intelligence, about half a billion years ago. Note how they talk around the problem here. Darwinists have twisted themselves into pretzels trying to explain how this could happen purely by natural selection acting on random mutation. Darwin started the thing off by suggesting that the explanation was that the fossil record was poor. Well, the fossil record is way better now, and it supports him even less. Not what you expected to hear in the Year of Darwin, eh?
Behind the Scenes With Darwin’s Dilemma: An Interview With Producer Lad Allen
On this episode of ID the Future Anika Smith interviews Illustra Media producer Lad Allen on the new film out next week, Darwin’s Dilemma. As the third film in the intelligent design trilogy from Illustra Media, Darwin’s Dilemma represents a capstone for Allen, who traversed the globe to present the story of Darwin’s journey to his theory of evolution and the Cambrian Explosion, the nagging problem for Darwin in the fossil record that has become a crisis for evolution today.
Listen in as Lad Allen shares with us what it’s like to shoot on location in four continents and work with scientists like Simon Conway Morris and Stephen Meyer.
Go here to listen.
(Note: The Smithsonian always had a huge problem with the Cambrian explosion because it never supported Darwinism, and their key scientist on the case in the days it first came to public notice attempted to hide the results.)
Here’s a video on the explosion:
2. Discovery Jeopardizes Darwinist Argument Against Cambrian Explosion
On this episode of ID the Future, Casey Luskin discusses how trails of microorganisms knock down a favorite Darwinist argument against the Cambrian explosion. Listen in as Luskin explains why Darwinists remain stuck — whether they like it or not — with a very explosive Cambrian explosion that isn’t the mere artifact of an imperfect fossil record.
Go here to listen.
[From Denyse: In my view, the Cambrian explosion knocked Darwinism through a cocked hat, and Darwin himself knew this all too well. But he had good public relations agents then and now. Earnest folk, happy to front an impossible idea if it keeps materialist atheism alive. What’s so telling – and damning – is their sheer defensiveness.
An Atheist Discusses the Scientific Merits of Intelligent Design
On this episode of ID the Future, atheist philosopher Bradley Monton defends intelligent design as science, discussing methodological naturalism and the evidential force of ID with Casey Luskin. Listen in as Professor Monton shares how ID-critic Robert Pennock tried to intimidate him.
Bradley J. Monton, Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of Colorado, Boulder, is author of the new book, Seeking God in Science: An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design (Broadview Press, 2009).
Listen to Part One of this series.
No, but seriously, Darwinism – as it exists today – is a tax-supported cult gone rotten. It attracts people like Pennock who have little to offer except policing the views of others, as he attempted to do with Monton, who sensibly repelled him. That’s the principle reason that cults eventually implode – no new ideas, just new PR hacks and new thugs. With the “evolutionary psychology” branch, the stink is finally coming to public attention.
Also posted at the Post-Darwinist:
Intellectual freedom in Canada: Now the “human rights” industry wants to decide who should be altar servers
Uncommon Descent Contest Question 8: Do the “new atheists” help or hurt the cause of Darwinism? Winner announced
Canada’s Blog Spring: Intellectual freedom in Canada: Mark Steyn says Section 13 (Canada’s attempted “smackdown” of intelligence) is dead
Darwinism and academic culture: Dem bones – Recent find upsets “sure thing” theories
What can’t be denied, can’t be believed either