Skip to content
Tuesday, May 17, 2022

Uncommon Descent

Serving The Intelligent Design Community

  • Home
  • News Desk
  • Resources
    • Frequently raised but weak arguments against Intelligent Design
    • ID Defined
    • Glossary
    • Archive of Posts by Michael Behe
    • Darwinian Debating Devices
  • Archives
  • Comment Policy
    • Moderation
    • Put a Sock In It
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Inside the Human Genome (book)

Tag: Inside the Human Genome (book)

'Junk DNA' Darwinism Genetics Intelligent Design

A 2010 Oxford U Press book on “unintelligent design” seems so dated now

Now that the very concept of “junk DNA” is being officially retired, this all seems pretty stale. Note: Well yes, there is still Nathan Lents and Human Errors: A Panorama of Our Glitches, from Pointless Bones to Broken Genes: Still wrong about sinuses but still writing about them.

Posted on October 14, 2021 Author News Comments(3)

Advertisements

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

Advertisements

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Donate

Help us to continue generating quality content and reliable website service.

Recent Comments

  • Bob O'H Querius @ 167 - So yes, my hypothesis is that all “junk DNA” has a function, though likely to have... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • Silver Asiatic Isaiah 45:7 The Hebrew words used for peace and evil in this verse are shalom and ra. The word shalom... – At Mind Matters News: Must we...
  • Viola Lee And what exactly was "confessed"? And whoever said randomness required a flat distribution? – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • martin_r as to communists, war, biology and other stuff, let me add this short David Attenborough style parody video about Russian... – Is China seriously contemplating [imminent?] invasion...
  • kairosfocus F/N: A Wikipedia confession: In common parlance, randomness is the apparent or actual lack of pattern or predictability in events.[1][2]... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • ET How is it not trivial, Fred? From Ernst Mayr, in "What Evolution Is": Do selection and elimination differ in their... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • Fred Hickson ...natural selection is non-random in a trivial sense in that not all variants have the same probability of being eliminated.... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • ET seversky: Has there been a time when the mainland Communist regime has not been contemplating the invasion of Taiwan? Yes – Is China seriously contemplating [imminent?] invasion...
  • ET Ram: Your version of God has to be held responsible for everything (Isaiah 45:7) What if I don't have a... – At Mind Matters News: Must we...
  • polistra We're bombing our own people and every country except China.. China has been attacking only its own people for a... – Is China seriously contemplating [imminent?] invasion...
  • ET Fred Hickson: Googling got me this: https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/112/2/287/2415796 Something for Upright Biped to ponder. Adaptive semiotics! LoL! It's a given that... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • asauber Yeah, Fred is a Troll. It has no interest in having an actual discussion. Andrew – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • ET Fred Hickson: I doubt Professor Coyne claims evolutionary processes are purely random. Are you just a complete idiot? No one... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • ET Fred Hickson: Better to have made clear that natural selection is non-random rather than assuming it Wow. Again, for the... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • ET Fred Hickson: It’s pointless trying to discuss biology with you. Nice projection! You appear to be ignorant of biology and... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • ET JVL: The point isn’t that one is different from the rest That is the point. the point is that there... – L&FP, 55: Defining/Clarifying Intelligent Design as...
  • asauber "But I don’t see what point you are trying to make here." Jholo, @11 you declared "the heart is just... – At Mind Matters News: Must we...
  • kairosfocus Jerry, could, would, did are three very different things. The evidences of design are manifold and manifest; save, to those... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • jerry I have a question, actually two questions. But first background. The fine tuning of the universe is so incredibly unlikely... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
  • kairosfocus Probably in the 80's - 00's. – Is China seriously contemplating [imminent?] invasion...
  • kairosfocus PS, for those who are more amenable to duties to truth, reason etc, let's clip the four ID postulates as... – Casey Luskin: ID as fruitful approach...
Copyright © 2022 Uncommon Descent. All rights reserved.
Theme: Newspaper Plus by ThemeCentury. Powered by WordPress.