You searched for peer review
Search Results
Peer review and citation ring “busted”
Peer review: “Conspiracy of hope” plays role in the problem of retraction-worthy papers
Peer review: Think a dog can’t get a degree?
Peer review: Retracted papers can take up to three years to be identified as such
Peer review: Would Fred Sanger get funded today?
Peer review: When “corrections” should really be retractions
Peer review: Retracted papers by nation
Peer review: All the retractions fit to print
Peer review: Researcher admits to enhanced images
Should peer reviewers sign their names?
Yes, Victoria, science journals do need an alternative to peer review
Peer reviewed article “misquotes” creationist Duane Gish by one word
The saying “nothing in evolution makes sense in the light of biology” is widely attributed to famous creationist Duane Gish. In 2006, I used the phrase myself here. Casey Luskin points out a recent peer-reviewed article critical of Darwinism almost got the phrase right: The evolutionary biologist Theodosius Dobzhansky famously noted that “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution,” but perhaps, too, “nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of biology.” Combatting Evolution to Fight Disease They didn’t get it exactly right, but still that’s progress. 🙂 You don’t need to understand evolution in order to understand biology! Evolutionism provides no useful insight to biology. HT: BA77