You searched for neuroscience
Search Results
Caution: Neuroscience quackery in the boardroom and classroom
Neuroscience: Illness is partly in your mind, so now the bad news …
Neuroscience: Illness is not all in your mind—but a lot of it is
So when did the big revolution of uniting Darwinism and neuroscience happen?
Will neuroscience drown in all the data from the brain?
“Increasing disquiet” over crude determinism in neuroscience?
What if you begin to believe, due to neuroscience, that there is no “me” left?
Some neuroscience is a cognitive drug?
Neuroscience we don’t need much more of
Why materialist neuroscience is dying and why it matters
We’ve talked about this. ‘Why Malcolm Gladwell matters and why it unfortunate,” this cognitive scientist sums it up: UI don’t think the main flaw is oversimplification (though that is a problem: Einstein was right when he—supposedly—advised that things be made as simple as possible, but no simpler). As I wrote in my own review, the main flaw is a lack of logic and proper evidence in the argumentation. But consider what Gladwell’s quote means. He is saying that if you understand his topics enough to see what he is doing wrong, then you are not the reader he wants. At a stroke he has said that anyone equipped to properly review his work should not be reading it. How convenient! Read More ›