Plant evolves a new function? Or was it designed?
Captured on film: How plants learn of danger from other plants
“Stunning sweep” for ID-friendly US prez hopeful Rick Santorum
The grand posturing and pretenses of mainstream media – and how it affects us
Researchers have reconstructed the song of a Jurassic cricket …
Depew paper tries to soften the blow: “We would be the last to suggest that Darwinism can’t reform and reframe itself yet again.”
British mystery! Who was responsible for forging Piltdown Man?
Why science can’t study the supernatural – A physicist’s view
Why proposed improvements to failing schools don’t really work, Part II: Eat Smart!!
Here’s more, from the literature, on those 760 million year old fossil sponges
Richard Weikart asks Christian Darwinists some pretty obvious questions
Evolution is a Big Word, Part 2: Diving Deeper into the Theories of Evolution
In the article Evolution is a Big Word, I cover several issues. In our last installment, we discussed what the multiplicity of theories means for the claims of a consensus opinion about evolution. In this installment, I wanted to talk about the theories themselves. There are several questions I would like to propose to our readers: Of the theories listed, which ones do you think have the best evidence? Of the theories listed, which one is your favorite? What theories did I miss? (If you list a theory, please provide a link to a paper or book describing the theory) Which theories of evolution are consonant and/or dissonant with Intelligent Design? What are the theological and political corollaries of the Read More ›