In fairness to the Darwinists, they probably aren’t intentionally discriminating against people with disabilities. They are used to destroying the careers of doubters, able or otherwise. They have never before been called to account for that.
At Phys.org: How giant-faced owls snag voles hidden in snow
“Several of the owls’ physical features, especially parts of their wings and face, help them correct for sonic distortions caused by the snow, enabling them to find their moving food with astonishing accuracy.”
At Science Daily: Fossil overturns more than a century of knowledge about the origin of modern birds
“Fossilized fragments of a skeleton, hidden within a rock the size of a grapefruit, have helped upend one of the longest-standing assumptions about the origins of modern birds.”
At Science News: This ancient worm might be an important evolutionary missing link
“Lophophorates are a collection of sea creatures with a murky past.”
At Phys.org: New study finds our ancient relatives were not so simple after all
Lacking a naturalistic mechanism for the generation of the new information of novel features, the idea of the “loss of features” is put forward as a driving factor for supposed evolutionary advance.
At Phys.org: Learning to better understand the language of algae
Communication implies the purposeful interchange of information. How does intentionality arise from natural interactions between atoms?
Evolution and Imagination
Does the committed evolutionist unconsciously impute their imagination into the supposed biological outworkings of the laws of nature?
At Science Daily: Study finds unexpected protective properties of pain
Researchers: “The classic view of pain is that it protects by detecting and signaling the presence of harmful agents, but new research shows pain can shield the gut more directly.”
At Phys.org: The thinking undead: How dormant bacteria calculate their return to life
This fascinating research presents yet another remarkable example of biochemical complexity with a functionality dependent upon environmental sensing, signal evaluation, operational feedback, managing stored resources, and survivability–all within a supposedly inert “spore.” I’ll call that evidence of intelligent design.
At Phys.org: Discovery of new microscopic species expands the tree of life
Researchers explain that the “greedy appetites” of microorganisms “were one of the leading factors of the evolution of more complex life in the early ages of Earth.”
At Evolution News: Gene Sharing Is More Widespread than Thought, with Implications for Darwinism
David Coppedge writes: Evidence is growing that organisms share existing genetic information horizontally, not just vertically. This has immense implications for neo-Darwinian theory that are not yet fully recognized. If traits can be shared across species, genera and even phyla, they are not being inherited from common ancestors. The findings might also cast stories about Read More…
At Science Daily: What makes the human brain different?
The worldview that excludes non-material realities will never perceive the God-breathed human spirit, without which we could only be dust.
At Phys.org: Discovery of new types of microfossils may answer age-old scientific question
“Scientists have long pondered how and when the evolution of prokaryotes to eukaryotes occurred. A collaborative research team from Tohoku University and the University of Tokyo may have provided some answers after discovering new types of microfossils dating 1.9 billion years.”
The Intelligent Design Audiopaper Project
I was thinking recently, about how many audiobooks are consumed by people these days. I would guess that the main reason behind this consumption is convenience. Many people just don’t have the time, or don’t create the time, to really sit down and get their head in a book. But I understand that for many, Read More…
At Evolution News: An Evolutionary Mathematician Flunks Biology
Arguments and counter-arguments serve a purpose in arriving at a truthful conclusion. But what if one side jumps ship when the waves of counter-argument are unassailable?