It is bound to shed light on many current mysteries and controversies — and to create new ones instead.
Astronomy
Is Sarah Salviander going to make a difference in science?
Of herself she says: Astrophysicist. I have a PhD in Astrophysics and worked for many years in academia as a scientific researcher. Though I am currently focused on ministry work, I am still active in astrophysical research. Visit my research page here.
Wokeness isn’t new: Apparently there was such a thing as Marxist astronomy
Pannekoek would have been a stalwart, had he lived, in the war on math.
What’s the story with the strange signals from the galaxy’s center?
Astronomers: “The brightness of the object also varies dramatically, by a factor of 100, and the signal switches on and off apparently at random. We’ve never seen anything like it.” (We will soon be in a better position to find out what it is because the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) radio telescope will be commissioned within the decade.)
Pluto is still planet in the eyes of many
Grossman: “… since 2006, we’ve learned that Pluto has an atmosphere and maybe even clouds. It has mountains made of water ice, fields of frozen nitrogen, methane snow–capped peaks, and dunes and volcanoes. “It’s a dynamic, complex world unlike any other orbiting the sun,” journalist Christopher Crockett wrote in Science News in 2015 when NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft flew by Pluto.”
Does the next 30 years of astronomy depend on a single report?
Does the next 30 years of astronomy in the U.S. depend on a single report? So they say. And all isn’t well.
Recently discovered giant arc of galaxies may “break” Standard Model in cosmology
Lisa Grossman: This model assumes that when you look at large enough volumes of space — above about 1 billion light-years — matter is distributed evenly.
Saturday night: Ex-Pentagon whistleblower warns of UFO 9-11
The remarkable thing is that we haven’t found so much as a fossil bacterium in recent Mars samples. The belief that whatever’s weird out there must be aliens is a sheer act of faith. The same people who would dismiss massive evidence for design in the universe and life forms believe in ET with no evidence at all. That’s probably because, at heart, their commitment is one of the few types of religion that naturalism permits.
Then, they came for Sir Isaac . . .
Newton. The latest year zero reset target, as Telegraph reports: Sir Isaac Newton has been labelled as a potential beneficiary of “colonial-era activity” in draft plans to “decolonise” the engineering curriculum at Sheffield University. Students learning about the mathematician and scientist’s three laws of motion, the core of modern physics, could see changes in their Read More…
Researchers: Radioactive snowflakes will destroy stars!
A pair of researchers with Indiana University and Illinois University, respectively, has developed a theory that suggests crystalizing uranium “snowflakes” deep inside white dwarfs could instigate an explosion large enough to destroy the star. (No, it doesn’t matter much but it’s Saturday night.)
Researchers: “Vast reservoir” of complex molecules found in cold cloud, not dying stars, as expected
Researcher: “It’s like going into a boutique shop and just browsing the inventory on the front-end without ever knowing there was a back room. We’ve been collecting little molecules for 50 years or so and now we have discovered there’s a back door. When we opened that door and looked in, we found this giant warehouse of molecules and chemistry that we did not expect,” said McGuire.
Remember space junk ‘Oumuamua? A conventional explanation is now offered: Nitrogen ice from Pluto
It’s curious how folklore can prevail for ages in science as long as it has a naturalistic origin. Maybe Top People shouldn’t count on everyone just forgetting that now.
Avi Loeb at Scientific American on the importance of reproducibility in science
Okay re the importance of reproducibility but it was never clear why Oumuamua was supposed to be ET anyway. More Oumuamuas would not make it more likely.
Astronomers: Maybe there really isn’t a Planet Nine
At Nature: The researchers found that the objects’ orbits could be explained without the presence of a nearby planet.
A recent black hole collision has spurred thinking about the tiniest scales
Classically, it shouldn’t have happened.