2014
New at MercatorNet, Connecting
Stuff Doesn’t Evolve–It Just Shows Up in the Beginning
Here’s a news article from Phys.Org on a lamprey study. Actually it’s a study concerning phylogenetics and using gene regulatory mechanisms to figure out the relationships that exist. It turns out that in the lamprey, which is part of the Cambrian explosion, the same kind of hind brain gene regulatory mechanisms are in place as in “jawed” vertebrates, including mammals. From the article: The team at Stowers, collaborating with Marianne Bronner, Ph.D., professor of biology at Caltech, focused on the sea lamprey because the fossil record shows that its ancestors emerged from Cambrian silt approximately 500 million years ago, 100 million years before jawed fish ever swam onto the scene. The question was, could the hindbrain gene regulatory network that Read More ›
Never mind Darwin’s Doubt. What about Darwin’s “horrid doubt”?
Bill Dembski’s University of Chicago talk, August 15, 2014
BioLogos’ former prez softens stance toward Darwin’s Doubt book
Science writer Mark Oppenheimer asks if misogyny will bring down the atheist movement
A crisis in “secular studies”?
Fun for philosophers: Is God in time or not?
A Pond-Dwelling, Single-Celled Organism Does Amazing Genetic Engineering
A new paperwas published last week on a remarkable single-celled organism,Oxytricha trifallax, that has two nucleus’ and 16,000 chromosomes (recall that humans have 46). The organism uses one nucleus to store its active DNA and the other nucleus to store an archive of the genome. Amazingly, Oxytricha trifallax, disassembles the archived copy into a quarter-million pieces and then rapidly reassembles them into a new and improved version. This reassembly occurs at mating time as the organism and its mate exchange about half their genome. Read more
When I Pointed Out the De Novo Gene Evidence an Evolutionist Came Unglued
It is interesting that evolutionists, who believe they came from primitive apes, display a certain primitive thought in their communications. The latest example is an evolutionist who criticized a book skeptical of evolution. The book made the point that fundamentally new genes are unlikely to have evolved by the usual random change and natural selection mechanisms. The book elaborated on this problem at length. But the evolutionist retorted that this was all wrong: Read more
Classic ARN vid: Phillip E. Johnson on Darwinism on Trial
ID theorist Bill Dembski responds to Adami’s claims about spontaneous emergence of life
Here is the Latest Example of Evolution Undermining Law
Evolution is not merely a scientific mistake. It is not a theory gone wrong, started by a guy in 1859. Evolutionary thinking was alive and well when Charles Darwin codified it in the emerging life sciences, for it had been developed and promoted by theologians and philosophers since the seventeenth century. If you understand that history, then today’s world makes much more sense. It is often said that evolution is the most influential scientific theory, but that is because evolution isn’t just a scientific theory, it is a broader world view. So with the dominance of evolution comes a wide array of influences, in government and in society, and across the political spectrum. Another example of this came last week Read More ›