Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Researchers: Pigeons, otherwise stupid, learn to recognize people they know


Were we discussing how plants communicate with each other? Well, From “Birds Can Recognize People’s Faces and Know Their Voices” (ScienceDaily, June 22, 2012), we learn,

New research suggests that some birds may know who their human friends are, as they are able to recognize people’s faces and differentiate between human voices.

The team trained a group of pigeons to recognise the difference between photographs of familiar and unfamiliar objects. These pigeons, along with a control group, were then shown photographs of pairs of human faces. One face was of a person familiar to the birds whilst the other was of someone they had not seen before.

The experimental group birds were able to recognise and classify the familiar people using only their faces, whereas the birds without prior training failed. The results show that pigeons can discriminate between the familiar and unfamiliar people and can do this on solely using facial characteristics.

Lincoln’s lead researcher on the project, Dr Anna Wilkinson, from the School of Life Sciences, said: “Such advanced cognitive processes have rarely been observed in pigeons and suggest that they not only recognise individual humans but also know who they know — something which could be very important for survival. Some humans feed pigeons, others chase them. To know individuals and act appropriately to them is enormously advantageous.”

None of this would surprise anyone who feeds birds. The interesting part is that pigeons have usually been regarded as stupid compared to, say, starlings. One researcher, after offering various suggestions about what is going on in the starling’s head, admits,

It is notoriously difficult to get inside the black box of an animal’s brain in order to establish, for example, whether they can appreciate another’s visual perspective or even whether they have a ‘theory of mind’.

But it’s not clear that the birds need a theory of mind for the relevant tasks.

That is, recognizing the face of the person who scatters stale bread crusts need not involve speculation as to motive. And faces offer a cue that won’t be completely different tomorrow, as clothes might be.

This YEC welcomes these things. First having birds match apes should end research into attempts to show apes are almost ready for being us. Second. We are created in gods image. Yet memory in us is part of nature as it breaks down. It could only be that memory is a machine. its a presumption that being vastly more intelligent means a greater memory ability. memory is a part of intelligence and thus must be a part of special human intellectual identity it has been reasoned. in fact research today shows animals have great memory. Not great smarts. jUst the memory! Rather memory is possibly the same for all creatures. Humans simply use it more because of our intelligence. I say memory is unrelated to our thinking being, made from God, and is just a middleman for the relationship between us and our bodies. Therefore memory should be seen as the culprit in problems in human thinking. Like retardation,autism spectrum and old age. Not the memory machine but the triggering mechanism. bring on those critters with better memories then me. it should be this way seeing us as beings who think like a God and not as beings who think with the machines of nature.Robert Byers
June 26, 2012
01:22 AM

Leave a Reply