Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

FFT*: Charles unmasks the anti-ID trollish tactic of attacking God, Christian values and worldview themes

Categories
Atheism
Control vs Anarchy
Food for thought
Politics
rhetoric
worldview
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

In a current thread on SJW invasions in engineering education,  in which yet another anti-ID commenter crosses over into troll territory, Charles does a very important worldviews and cultural agendas dissection. One, that is well worth headlining as *food for thought (as opposed to a point by point across-the-board endorsement):

Charles, 51>>The point of the original post was that Engineering was being contaminated with Social Justice Warrior values & viewpoints. As any engineer knows, what makes engineering “Engineering” is the rigorous adherence to physical reality, analysis, and testing to design something that is reliably fit for purpose. As the author’s article at American Conservative elaborates, Prof. Riley’s SJW viewpoint is the antithesis of sound Engineering. kairosfocus summarized this point with his comment that:

“Bridges gotta stand up under load.”

[Troll X’s]  snide and dismissive comment that

”How’s that [bridges needing to stand up under load] working out for ID?”

juxtaposed civil engineering with ID, impugning that ID was not Engineering. That is a fallacious comparison on several levels, not least of which is Engineering’s maturity born of hundreds of years of applied science, advancing technology, and development of best practices, contrasted with ID in its relative infancy, as well as engineering being all about “how to design” versus ID which endeavors to reduce to practice the “recognition of design”.

Implicit in [Troll X’s] comment is the presumption that evolution (or materialism or atheism) has a laudable track record over ID similar to engineering. As if to say “evolution” is a successful, testable, reliable theory like “engineering”, whereas ID is an engineering failure.

But evolution has no such track record of theoretical success. Modern evolution doesn’t even have a theory that makes testable predictions, and moreover, all of Darwinian evolution’s predictions (such as transition forms will be found in the geologic record)) have all failed, which I likened to engineering failures in my response to [Troll X]:

As compared to Darwinian Evolution’s collapsed bridges, toppled buildings, crashed airplanes and lack of repeatable, testable theory?

john_a_designer then affirms that [Troll X] hadn’t thought through the implications of his atheism, namely that atheism is bankrupt and contributes nothing intellectually, summed up as

“Haven’t we been told that atheism is “just disbelief”?”

Indeed.

At which point, I elaborated that while atheists claim they “just disbelieve”, atheists are not content with just disbelieving. That in fact, atheists fear and worry they are wrong as evidenced by the effort they put out to convince “believers” that there is no evidence for their belief in God or Jesus Christ.

When someone “just disbelieves” there is little or no concern attached to the disbelief. I gave the example of disbelieving in a flat earth. When someone argues the earth is flat, the atheist might criticize that belief and show a space station picture of our spherical green, blue and white “marble”, but they don’t define themselves by their disbelief – they don’t call themselves “aflatearthers”, they don’t write volumes on the philosophy of aflatearthism, they don’t dedicate websites to flatearth skepticism, they don’t spend countless man-years holding flatearthers up to ridicule. No. They shrug, and move on.

As wrong headed as flatearthers are, why don’t disbelievers define themselves as “aflatearthers” and lobby for flatearth beliefs to be eliminated from society? Because they don’t care, because they have a confidence born of evidence and experience that the earth is round, and flatearth arguments just don’t matter.

But atheists define themselves as A-Theists – against, without, absent, sans, theism. They invariably in social or political gatherings are self-compelled to declare, to signal, their atheistic world view and how it is self-evident to be intellectually superior over Christians in specific and over religionists in general (cowards that they are, they rarely take specific exception with Muslims or Islam). And atheists write volumes about their self-labeled viewpoint, they fill libraries, they write textbooks, they lobby legislatures, they put signs on buses, all to advance their self-defined atheistic world view. They are very concerned and discontent about their disbelief.

Why?

Because they are intellectually threatened. Because “The Enlightenment” and atheism’s ascendancy is over. Back in the day, when we didn’t know about the Big Bang, when we didn’t know how the universe was fine-tuned for our life, when we didn’t know how exquisitely mechanized are cellular functions, when we didn’t know that DNA and RNA were actually huge complex information programs densely encoded in precisely folded chemical molecules that have no natural tendency to otherwise so organize themselves (let alone replicate and error correct), and then there is the little matter of human consciousness. Back then being an atheist was easy, almost automatic. It was easy to say “random chance did it” – but that was an ignorant and arrogant presumption.

Today, the materialist, the atheist, has no answer for any of that. They have a multitude of speculations, yes, but no engineering-like understanding or scientific theories that make testable predictions. Evolutionary “theory” in all its claims (setting aside its failures) has nothing like our level of understanding of relativity, quantum mechanics, chemistry, or information theory. In fact the scientists who are expert in those subjects [—> will often] acknowledge that “chance” could not have begun our fine-tuned universe or life.

The modern atheist is forced into special pleading for a multi-verse, that free-will is imaginary and then piggyback on Christian morality as they have no basis in their own materialism to justify good or evil other than personal preference in any particular situation. About all of which, they could be complacent if it weren’t for Christian theists.

While the atheist has no defense against the failure of science to prove a multiverse or that life arose from inert chemicals, the Christian has an affirmative argument for what the atheist can’t prove. The Bible records that God made the Heavens and Earth, ex nihilo (the Big Bang), created life with consciousness and morality, and gave us free will to love and obey God, or not. Only the Christian is so audacious as to confront atheism directly.

Hence the atheist or materialist drive to remove Christian prayer from schools, thought from universities, and gatherings from public places. And the atheist was not content to merely suppress Christian viewpoints, but now seeks to impose atheist behavior on Christians; Christians must bake cakes for homosexual weddings, Christian chaplains must teach Islam, Christian schools must hire atheists and allow them to teach “diversity”. What the atheist can not achieve by intellectual persuasion, they seek to impose by legislation and force of confiscation and imprisonment.

All the foregoing while atheists cloak themselves in a false morality that they hijacked from aspects of Christianity. Atheists talk of being opposed to murder, except when Muslims murder homosexuals and then it’s abject silence. Atheists talk of being for equal rights for women, except unborn women or Muslim women. Atheists talk of doing good for mankind, but atheists don’t start hospitals, didn’t start universities (like Harvard or Princeton), and you don’t see atheists organizing charities or feeding the homeless. [–> NB: There are exceptions to this, we don’t have to endorse every claim to think something is worth headlining.]

The atheist argues that religious views have no justification in society’s laws, yet declaring bankruptcy has its roots in Judeo “jubilee” forgiveness of debt and servitude, marriage is a Judeo Christian sacrament, and the legal prohibitions on murder, theft, and lying all are millennia’s old Judeo-Christian teachings.

To Christian arguments against the atheist, the atheist in variably responds with a) “science will some day prove _____” and b) “there is no evidence for God (and the Bible doesn’t count as evidence)”

The problem for the atheist is that a) science is further away than ever of proving “chance” underlay the big bang and our information-based life. In fact, information may also underlie the laws of physics and the hence the fine-tuned universe in which we live, and b) there is evidence for the existence of God, some of it logical, philosophical arguments, some of it forensic proofs.

And now we come to the atheists’ discomfort with their own disbelief. So, not only is materialistic evolution a theoretical failure and scientific near impossibility, the atheist has no alternative proven scientific explanation for what the Bible plainly declares were creative acts of God. The atheist is forced to borrow and impose biblical concepts just to maintain a civil society (while banning Christian beliefs the atheist dislikes). Lastly the atheist is further confronted with evidence for God’s existence and that Jesus Christ is Lord and Savior. That forensic evidence is fulfilled biblical prophecy in which God supernaturally declares to Daniel several hundred years in advance that the Messiah would appear, and forensic evidence further shows that prophecy to have been fulfilled by Jesus Christ.>>

Let’s “embed” a highly relevant video that we need to be reminded of:

[vimeo 17960119]

Food for thought, let us ponder and let us discuss responsibly, noting that we are not here endorsing every point or claim but rather think it is well worth pondering together. END

Comments
F/N: On seeing RVB8 conspicuously absent here but active elsewhere, I reminded him of the gauntlet he has laid down esp. at 290 but also earlier in this thread [thanks Charles, 286 was a useful pick-up), and called on him to address the matter. His reply was:
6 rvb8April 27, 2017 at 11:04 pm Kairos, I don’t need to justify myself to you concerning anything! What a prig. I talk to students like Zeng Bo Wen, Hu Xiao Yun, Du Xiao Rui, and others and talk to them about their recent conversions. As I explain that it is now Christ that they must love above their parents, and in one case wife, that this evangelical sect actually takes Genesis at its word, and they must too, and that their lives are now judged, they balk. Basically Kairos, they never were Christian, I merely point it out. ‘Justiy?‘ myself to you? My god, what an oversized ego.
My onward response, which I just posted there, is:
RVB8, just for a note of record, you presented yourself as having a list of questions for young Christians to take to their leaders -- their "new-found friends" -- in a further context of essentially characterising Protestantism in particular and its leaders as fools and/or frauds propagating a scheme of thought and faith without sound foundations. You also made claims about utter lack of foundations for the Christian Faith, in particular denying the historical references in early extrabiblical writers], cf also Charles' comment regarding your listed claims here at 286. In sum, you have made a series of exceedingly strong negative claims that broad-brush indict millions. Justifying yourself is therefore NOT an issue of mere priggishness on my part but instead your patent need to back up claims like:
rvb8 @ 168: Several of my students are Christian, two are Muslim, and I never disabuse them of their faith. rvb8 @ 216: A faith that was picked up from half baked, misguided, US and UK evagelists is something I disabuse these new converts of rvb8 @ 250: I actually sidetracked the discussion when I explained I happily disabuse Chinese Christian converts of their faith, if I can get in early enough to relieve the damage. rvb8 @ 196: There are a few Catholics in my classes, they have come from old Catholic Chinese families, and I never mock Christianity, or attack their beliefs, rvb8 @ 196: … Slack jawed yokals, … I loathe these demi-humans. … [Chinese authorties] treat these people with more respect than they deserve. rvb8 @ 216: A faith that was picked up from half baked, misguided, US and UK evagelists … I explain that their new faith denies much of modern science including evolution and many times, global warming, the probable commonality of life in the universe, and is often anti-vaccine. rvb8 @ 233: It is about as useful as pointing out to a Chrisitian the utter lack of hard evidence for their own faith. …. I can however attack silliness before it takes root, rvb8 @ 231: If I can prevent them from becoming evangelical by simple converstions, I do, rvb8 @ 233: It is about as useful as pointing out to a Chrisitian the utter lack of hard evidence for their own faith. rvb8 @ 168 You insult me. Fine, have at it. Small minded religious types are my bread and butter. I have also reconverted several students and released them from the prison of Chrisitianity. These reconverted are not the Catholics in my class, they are the Born Again types, who only went with the music and group love. ‘Here I stand I can do no other!’ Have a nice day:)
and in particular like:
290 rvb8April 22, 2017 at 12:41 am (Edit) Charles, I met two more students, newly won to Jesus. Im meeting them for coffee tomorrow, and a chat; no harassement, or arm pulling, no lies (unlike some), just coffee and a list of questions for their new found friends. You and your ilk, are indeed my bread and butter.
. . . or else stand as making assertions and accusations that you cannot warrant. You have plainly laid down a gauntlet. We took it up, inviting you to post the list of questions you boasted of in 290 for us. In the next comment, you will see (with onward links to relevant materials):
291 kairosfocusApril 22, 2017 at 2:50 am (Edit) RVB8, Yes, a list of loaded questions that are manipulative, on track record, and posed by someone in a role of authority with grading power over the students — the implications of which power imbalance don’t seem to jump out at you. (Cf. a primer on typical first level issues I developed, quite some time back, part of a cell group leadership training manual (note basic first level discipleship guide here); with here on being a response to worldview issues that struck me as framing for the reformation of civilisation some years back. And there are endless cases of responsible answers to issues and challenges out there, just such are inaccessible to people under a dictatorship and police state in China.) Notice, above you failed to engage adequately either the worldviews case or the history-evidence one, and in an onward discussion the former recurs. I suggest to you that your bigoted projections on Protestant presumably Evangelical Christians betray an underlying deep-rooted problem. I would suggest to you that before you set out to subvert souls, you pause and ponder the eternally freighted responsibility you are taking up. KF PS: Presumably, UD is accessible in China. Why don’t you simultaneously post your list of questions here, and see if we are unable to engage them cogently, letting your students have access to the results — or better yet the live, in-progress process?
I therefore raised the matter here because you seem to be avoiding addressing the list of questions there. KF PS: I am copying this post in the other thread also.
Let us see how this plays out onward. KFkairosfocus
April 27, 2017
April
04
Apr
27
27
2017
11:35 PM
11
11
35
PM
PDT
PS: Notice, again, utterly independent of whether there are signs in the world of life and the cosmos, that per empirically reliable signs, point to intelligently directed configuration as key cause.kairosfocus
April 27, 2017
April
04
Apr
27
27
2017
08:42 AM
8
08
42
AM
PDT
FFT10 A: Let's proceed to the core warranting argument of the Christian framework, i/l/o Paul at Mars Hill. Many may be ignorant of this kairos-moment, AD50 at Athens so I just note how Paul faced riots, whipping and gaoling in Macedonia to the North, then was driven out. He was in Athens for several weeks and there he made a decisive turning like a great lion who has run as far as it will, turns to vex those who have unwisely persisted in chasing it:
Acts 17:6 Now while Paul was waiting for them at Athens, his spirit was greatly angered when he saw that the city was full of idols. 17 So he had discussions in the synagogue with the Jews and the God-fearing Gentiles, and in the market place day after day with any who happened to be there. 18 And some of the [b]Epicurean and Stoic philosophers began to engage in conversation with him. And some said, “What could this idle babbler [with his eclectic, scrap-heap learning] have in mind to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a proclaimer of strange deities”—because he was preaching the good news about Jesus and the resurrection. 19 They took him and brought him to the [c]Areopagus (Hill of Ares, the Greek god of war), saying, “May we know what this [strange] new teaching is which you are proclaiming? 20 For you are bringing some startling and strange things to our ears; so we want to know what they mean.” 21 (Now all the Athenians and the foreigners visiting there used to spend their [leisure] time in nothing other than telling or hearing something new.) 22 So Paul, standing in the center of the Areopagus, said:
“Men of Athens, I observe [with every turn I make throughout the city] that you are very religious and devout in all respects. 23 Now as I was going along and carefully looking at your objects of worship, I came to an altar with this inscription: ‘TO AN [d]UNKNOWN GOD.’ Therefore what you already worship as unknown, this I proclaim to you. 24 The God who created the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands; 25 nor is He [e]served by human hands, as though He needed anything, because it is He who gives to all [people] life and breath and all things. 26 And He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their lands and territories. 27 This was so that they would seek God, if perhaps they might grasp for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us. 28 For in Him we live and move and exist [that is, in Him we actually have our being], as even some of [f]your own poets have said, ‘For we also are His children.’ 29 So then, being God’s children, we should not think that the Divine Nature (deity) is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and imagination or skill of man. 30 Therefore God overlooked and disregarded the former ages of ignorance; but now He commands all people everywhere to repent [that is, to change their old way of thinking, to regret their past sins, and to seek God’s purpose for their lives], 31 because He has set a day when He will judge the inhabited world in righteousness by a Man whom He has appointed and destined for that task, and He has provided credible proof to everyone by raising Him from the dead.”
32 Now when they heard [the term] resurrection from the dead, [g]some mocked and sneered; but others said, “We will hear from you again about this matter.” 33 So Paul left them. 34 But some men joined him and believed; among them were Dionysius, [a judge] of the Council of Areopagus [--> later, first Bishop of Athens, its Patron Saint and Patron Saint of Paris also, where tradition says he later went], and a woman named Damaris, and others with them. [AMP]
Notice, his subtle foundational devastation of the worldviews of ordinary people and educated pagans alike in his opening remarks. The leading centre of learning had to maintain a public monument to its ignorance on the central subject of knowledge, the root of reality. Accordingly, Paul came to teach them based on the revelation that God has made, demonstrated through the resurrection from death of the Man ordained By God as eschatological judge, with 500 witnesses. This is of course, further, in fulfillment of prophecy on the matter from up to 700 years ahead of time as is laid out in a central prophecy, Isa 53. Notice, he is not arguing to God, but from the God they sense but only can grope blindly towards. He then brings them to understand that we are under God's sovereign power, he does not depend on our religious service. Rightful spiritual service is in fact for our own good. He focusses his case on the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. Yes, even though such seems folly to Greeks and an offence to Jews. He is here insisting that God's weakness and folly as we perceive in an endarkened state we imagine is enlightened, are stronger and wiser than men. So, he cuts across our pride from start to finish. No wonder the sneers. (Sounds familiar?) Some seem to want to postpone decision. Some few, at first, respond. From those few would come the future of our civilisation. A lesson for us again, today. Again, FFT. KFkairosfocus
April 27, 2017
April
04
Apr
27
27
2017
08:38 AM
8
08
38
AM
PDT
I was interested in what has been driving this discussion thread so I did a little math. Of the 331 comments, approximately 80% were either written by RVB*, Armand Jacks and JDK, or these people were mentioned by other commenters. Say what you like about them, they certainly have a talent for stimulating discussion.hammaspeikko
April 27, 2017
April
04
Apr
27
27
2017
06:47 AM
6
06
47
AM
PDT
kairosfocus @ 330: Yes. An excellent opportunity for rvb8 to show us all what the truth is. rvb8 @ 290
a list of questions for their new found friends. You and your ilk, are indeed my bread and butter.
c'mon rvb8, my ilk and I are waiting. Surely it doesn't take you 5 days to post your list of questions. Think of how amazed your students will be when your questions show us what small-minded, Born Again, untravelled, slack jawed yokels we all are. Maybe your Chinese administrators will give you a more elevated and prominent teaching position. You'll be a hero.Charles
April 27, 2017
April
04
Apr
27
27
2017
06:24 AM
6
06
24
AM
PDT
Charles, did you notice this is top thread of the month with coming on 4,000 hits? (And, I think that is reckoned in terms of unique visitors.) KFkairosfocus
April 27, 2017
April
04
Apr
27
27
2017
03:41 AM
3
03
41
AM
PDT
RVB8, we are still waiting. If you are not confident enough to publicly pose questions you set out to vex young Christians with, that speaks saddening volumes. And, if the whole story is actually made up to promote your evident atheism, that you apparently cannot stand up on the merits in an open forum should give you pause. I suggest, you should carefully reconsider what you have been advocating. KFkairosfocus
April 27, 2017
April
04
Apr
27
27
2017
03:03 AM
3
03
03
AM
PDT
RVB8, yes, we wait. KFkairosfocus
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
08:59 PM
8
08
59
PM
PDT
rvb8 @ 290
a list of questions for their new found friends. You and your ilk, are indeed my bread and butter.
We’re still waiting on your list of questions for Christians.Charles
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
07:04 PM
7
07
04
PM
PDT
Charles, that's a point though I think also the hard truth is we deal with those who willfully refuse to look at inconvenient evidence and then go out to pose as brites even as they resort to selectively hyperskeptical, too often outright trollish and just plain rude objectionism. KFkairosfocus
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
07:38 AM
7
07
38
AM
PDT
FFT9: Let's get the ball rolling, here I clip from my NCST U2, regarding Paul at Mars Hill: >>>>>>>>>>>> {{INTRODUCTION: We live in a skeptical age, where -- as was noted in the preliminary remarks for this course: . . . we are now in the age of Google, YouTube, blogs and other freely accessible web soap-box and forum technologies, Dan Brown and his The Da Vinci Code, the vituperative New Atheists, Radical IslamISTS, and many others. As a result, we now face a flood of superficially persuasive and atmosphere-poisoning materials that target God, the Scriptures, Jesus, the Christian Faith and Christians today (including personal hate and slander sites) and much more. This backs up an unprecedented and rising tidal wave of direct and undermining attacks against the Christian faith in the Caribbean and elsewhere that we can find on our streets, on our verandahs, on our TV's and computers, in our schools and offices, and even in our churches. A flood of attacks that finds us too often in a sad spiritual condition, and by and large utterly unprepared to soundly answer on the reason for the hope that we have: The two tidal wave threats to the Christian faith in the Caribbean In such a time as this, it is no longer enough to simply know the content of the gospel or the scriptures, and to rest content in our personal experience of life-changing encounter with God. For, all around us, the gospel, the God of the Bible, the Christian Faith, the churches and even individual Christians are under relentless, manipulative and too often hateful attack, attacks that are armed with superficially persuasive and too often viciously and maliciously toxic talking points that are free for a search and download; all across the Internet. And, in many cases, even when these toxic talking points fail to actually persuade, they so poison and polarise the atmosphere that it is very hard for people to listen to the Good News of Jesus and the reason for our hope in him. Which is part of the obvious intent. For, as Aristotle so tellingly warned 2,300 years ago in his The Rhetoric, Bk I Ch 2, arguments work by one or more of the appeals to (a) emotions, (b) credibility of an authority or presenter, or to (c) the actual meat of fact and reasoning, but -- and, this is the key problem -- hostile or poisoned emotions, once stirred, can utterly warp our judgement: Of the modes of persuasion furnished by the spoken word there are three kinds. The first kind depends on the personal character of the speaker [ethos]; the second on putting the audience into a certain frame of mind [pathos]; the third on the proof, or apparent proof, provided by the words of the speech itself [logos]. Persuasion is achieved by the speaker's personal character when the speech is so spoken as to make us think him credible . . . Secondly, persuasion may come through the hearers, when the speech stirs their emotions. Our judgements when we are pleased and friendly are not the same as when we are pained and hostile . . . Thirdly, persuasion is effected through the speech itself when we have proved a truth or an apparent truth by means of the persuasive arguments suitable to the case in question . . . As a direct result of such challenges and the willful creation of an increasingly toxic situation, we desperately need to equip a much broader base of people in the churches at a much higher level of understanding and living out of the gospel, the Scriptures, theology and issues; if we are to be credible, sound, competent and effective. Such a challenge also means and demands that as we set out to study systematic theology, we have to equip people to think through and lay a sound worldviews foundation, the main focal issue for this unit. It may be helpful here to look at a picture of how a worldview and cultural agenda can dominate a community, following a generic form of the "seven mountains of influence" framework popularised in recent years by Lance Wallnau of the USA, but apparently tracing to an analysis in 1975 by Bill Bright, Loren Cunningham and Francis Schaeffer: Video: What REALLY is the 7 Mountain Message? from Os Hillman on Vimeo. And, "foundations" (a characteristic New Testament word for laying a solid basis for thought, attitude, motivation and life, and building on it . . . ) shows just how radical -- that word comes from the Latin radix, root -- the Christian Faith really is. For, just as how the Athenians in Acts 17 wanted to hear "the latest ideas" but were by and large not open to a truly back- to- foundations and look- at- the fatal- cracks critique, avant garde thinkers in our day really want to hear the latest wrinkles and innovations within the comfortable World System of the day. They want to discuss some new Ptolemaic epicycle, not a Copernican, back to basics revolutionary idea that threatens their comfortable system. And don't you dare come along threatening to "box bread out of our mouths" by upending the system and rendering their expertise obsolete. (No wonder knowledge revolutions so often proceed one funeral at a time as one generation locked into the old way dies off and a new one emerges that is open to the new way.) So, the message of the gospel -- warranted by the credible history of Jesus and the power of the Spirit who breaks through in those who penitently heed it -- will do again just what Paul did 1960 years ago: start from something, some altar, some artifact, some inscription, something that inadvertently reflects the pivotal underlying problem. Thus, it will go to the roots and expose their rottenness, it will dig up a bit of the foundations and expose fatal structural cracks. Then it will call for a sounder foundation, as Jesus did at the close of the Sermon on the Mount: Matt 7:24 “Everyone who hears these words of mine and does them is like a wise man who built his house on rock. 25 The rain fell, the flood came, and the winds beat against that house, but it did not collapse because it had been founded on rock. 26 Everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. 27 The rain fell, the flood came, and the winds beat against that house, and it collapsed; it was utterly destroyed!” [NET] So also, we must be prepared for the response of amazement or puzzlement: Matt 7:28 When Jesus finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed by his teaching, 29 because he taught them like one who had authority, not like their experts in the law. [NET] In short, he cut clean across the traditions and the "Rabbi [Expert] X says, Rabbi [Expert] Y says, and so we have the right pedigree." No wonder, the upended experts, frequently, were less than amused. So also with Paul, when he reached the cutting point in his presentation at Mars Hill. The resurrection of Jesus with 500+ eyewitnesses. Foolishness to many Greeks locked into a view that saw the body as the prison of the soul, and an offense to the Jews who saw a crucified man as necessarily accursed by God. Hence the interruption and reaction: Acts 17: 29 [Paul:] ". . . since we are God’s offspring, we should not think the deity is like gold or silver or stone, an image made by human skill and imagination. 30 Therefore, although God has overlooked such times of ignorance, he now commands all people everywhere to repent, 31 because he has set a day on which he is going to judge the world in righteousness, by a man whom he designated, having provided proof to everyone by raising him from the dead.” 32 Now when they heard about the resurrection from the dead, some began to scoff, but others said, “We will hear you again about this.” 33 So Paul left the Areopagus. 34 But some people joined him and believed. Among them were Dionysius, who was a member of the Areopagus, a woman named Damaris, and others with them. [NET] But, as those few who responded found out, when the storm comes, God's foolishness, apparent weakness and strangeness will prove to be plainly wiser, stronger, sounder than the ways of men. In particular, in our day, we can see that science -- the major intellectual movement in our civilisation, is often dominated by an imposed materialism that was all too aptly summarised as follows by a major proponent, Professor Richard Lewontin, an evolutionary biologist of Harvard University: . . . It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door. [“Billions and Billions of Demons,” NYRB, January 9, 1997. (NB: a priori means the claim is imposed before the facts are allowed to speak Cf. critical survey here.)] In short, by imposing so-called methodological naturalism, in the minds of those who think like professor Lewontin -- e.g., the leadership of both the US National Academy of Science and National Science Teachers Association, along with many other individuals and groups (i.e. this is an ideologically and institutionally dominant, though patently question-begging, school of thought) -- science is forced into an evolutionary materialistic mould; right from the outset. That is, painful though it is to have to hear, such are plainly going in mind-closing logical circles, as Philip Johnson (a founding Intelligent Design movement thinker) pointed out in the following rebuttal to Lewontin of November that same year: For scientific materialists the materialism comes first; the science comes thereafter. We might more accurately term them "materialists employing science." And if materialism is true, then some materialistic theory of evolution has to be true simply as a matter of logical deduction, regardless of the evidence. That theory will necessarily be at least roughly like neo-Darwinism, in that it will have to involve some combination of random changes and law-like processes capable of producing complicated organisms that (in [now retired Oxford Evolutionary Biologist and atheism advocate Richard] Dawkins’ words) "give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose." . . . . The debate about creation and evolution is not deadlocked . . . Biblical literalism is not the issue. The issue is whether materialism and rationality are the same thing. Darwinism is based on an a priori commitment to materialism, not on a philosophically neutral assessment of the evidence. Separate the philosophy from the science, and the proud tower collapses. [Emphases added.] ["The Unraveling of Scientific Materialism," First Things, 77 (Nov. 1997), pp. 22 – 25.] But, in an era where evolutionary materialistic science gives many the impression that God is out of a job, how can the gospel have enough credibility to be heard? That is the second focal issue for this unit. Thirdly, we must also focus on responding responsibly and effectively to a region -- and a wider civilisation -- that has badly lost its way. This is the third focal issue for this unit. Climbing Mars Hill In AD 50, the Apostle Paul, having been harried out from city after city in Macedonia, faced a very similar set of challenges to what we now face, in Athens. And, as a great lion pushed too far turns at bay and vexes those who unwisely kept on pushing, harrying and pursuing, the apostle took a bold stance before the Areopagus: Ac 17:16 While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, his spirit was greatly upset because he saw the city was full of idols. 17 So he was addressing the Jews and the God-fearing Gentiles in the synagogue, and in the marketplace [the Agora] every day those who happened to be there. 18 Also some of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers were conversing with him, and some were asking, “What does this foolish babbler want to say?” Others said, “He seems to be a proclaimer of foreign gods.” (They said this because he was proclaiming the good news about Jesus and the resurrection.) 19 So they took Paul and brought him to the Areopagus [possibly, on Mars Hill itself -- pictured below -- or (more likely) in the neighbouring Agora], Mars hill, at the foot of the Acropolis in Athens (cf video tour here) . . . saying, “May we know what this new teaching is that you are proclaiming? 20 For you are bringing some surprising things to our ears, so we want to know what they mean.” 21 (All the Athenians and the foreigners who lived there used to spend their time in nothing else than telling or listening to something new.) 22 So Paul stood before the Areopagus and said, “Men of Athens, I see that you are very religious in all respects. 23 For as I went around and observed closely your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: ‘To an unknown god.’ Therefore what you worship without knowing it, this I proclaim to you. 24 The God who made the world and everything in it, who is Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by human hands, 25 nor is he served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives life and breath and everything to everyone. 26 From one man he made every nation of the human race to inhabit the entire earth, determining their set times and the fixed limits of the places where they would live, 27 so that they would search for God and perhaps grope around for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us. 28 For in him we live and move about and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, ‘For we too are his offspring.’ 29 So since we are God’s offspring, we should not think the deity is like gold or silver or stone, an image made by human skill and imagination. 30 Therefore, although God has overlooked such times of ignorance, he now commands all people everywhere to repent, 31 because he has set a day on which he is going to judge the world in righteousness, by a man whom he designated, having provided proof to everyone by raising him from the dead.” 32 Now when they heard about the resurrection from the dead, some began to scoff, but others said, “We will hear you again about this.” 33 So Paul left the Areopagus. 34 But some people joined him and believed. Among them were Dionysius, who was a member of the Areopagus, a woman named Damaris, and others with them. [NET] Paul's approach gives us some key examples and ideas: 1 --> As we have already outlined, he first found a culturally bridging point of contact, the now famous altar to the unknown god that points to the rhetorical kairos, the opportunity and occasion that focuses attention and opens the way for the speech to effect a breakthrough. So, while he is going to do a "look at the foundations and their cracks" radical critique, he is not introducing something utterly strange, but is explaining what the unknown God honoured in a municipal monument right there in their city has told him to say to the Athenians (and through them, to all peoples). 2 --> Subtly, he is also reminding the Athenians -- proud guardians of Greece's intellectual heritage (which is the heart of our own intellectual culture) -- that on the most important point of knowledge, the foundational ground of reality, the root of being, they have had to build a public monument to their ignorance. Craaack . . . the foundations of the pagan, cynical, skeptical worldview and culture -- "the common people thought the stories of the gods were equally true, the philosophers that they were equally false, the politicians that they were equally useful" [cf. Gibbon et al.] -- have a fatal structural flaw. 3 --> He then proceeded to correct common misunderstandings: the Creator of the cosmos is not dependent on us, nor is he confined to temples like the idols are. Instead, we depend on him, and as their own poets have put it we are his sons and daughters; it is in him that we live, move and have our being. 4 --> He is the creator of nationhood, and is Lord of the times, places and resources we have as nations; so supervising the course of history that from time to time, in the face of pivotal moments [ kairous], we are moved to grope for him, however blindly. 5 --> In this time, he has decisively intervened in history, showing us that we will stand before the bar of eternal judgement by raising Jesus (the one who will be our Judge, having felt the full force of human frailty and temptation) from the dead. 6 --> Accordingly, he calls us to face and acknowledge the credible truth, repent and put our trust in God in the face of Christ. Thus, Paul -- as do today's Christian thinkers -- found an acceptable point of contact, pointed to the key error he would correct, outlined our status as creatures and nations accountable before our common Creator, Sustainer, Lord and Father, then introduced the gospel. The key point of warrant for the gospel (and thus for the reality of that hitherto unknown God) is the resurrection, as attested by over five hundred eyewitnesses and the fulfillment of scriptural prophecies given in the key case some seven hundred years beforehand. And, in light of that gospel, we are all called to repentance. Alas, as outlined, that was the sticking point. For, the idea of a bodily resurrection cut across deeply entrenched worldview assumptions. So, many in the audience in effect said: never mind our acknowledged ignorance and whatever evidence you may present, we don't accept that God can be like that. The immediate results were therefore scanty, and Paul was literally laughed out of court. But, today, Dionysius the Areopagite (one of the few who heeded the gospel call that day) is remembered as the first bishop of Athens, and as its patron saint. Indeed, from a map of modern Athens, we can see that the road by Mars Hill is now called Apostle Paul Street. Its continuation by the Acropolis is Dionysius the Areopagite street. Behind the Agora is Holy Apostle church. To cap it all off, the above once- mocked Mars Hill speech is on a bronze plaque affixed at the foot of the hill itself: The verdict of history is in: the future belonged to the Apostle and even more to the gospel he proclaimed that decisive day. Not to the skeptical scholars or to cynical politicians of the ilk of a Pilate: "what is 'truth'?" Just so, in our day, by God's grace the well-warranted truth of the gospel will again prevail. For: 7 --> as Paul put it in Acts 17, God created the nations, and so controls our places and times [kairous], that we are forced to grope (however blindly and ignorantly) for him in the midst of crises. 8 --> Then, as Paul’s presence in Athens exemplifies, God sends his spokesmen into such places at such times with the call to repentance, renewal and reformation, opening the door -- “so that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles [???? -- ethne, from ????? -- ethnos n. 1. a race (as of the same habit), i.e. a tribe] through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Holy Spirit.”[Gal. 3:14, NIV '84] 9 --> Therefore, following Eph 4:9 - 16, "[Jesus] . . . gave" leaders to the church, "to prepare God's people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up . . . attaining to the whole measure of the fulness of Christ." [NIV '84] 10 --> So, God is now sending the gospel of blessing to the nations of the Caribbean in our time of kairos, thus calling out, creating, building and equipping his body, the church “the fulness of him who fills everything in every way” as the means of blessing for our region and beyond, to the wider world. 11 --> Thus, he is sending us out as his disciples, into — and beyond — the local community as “God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.” 12 --> Consequently, as we live, love, evangelise, disciple, serve, and provide high integrity leadership, Christ’s reforming and transforming redemptive fullness will naturally, often invisibly and imperceptibly, spread through "all things" across the Caribbean Basin and beyond. 13 --> This promotes truly sustainable -- God-blessed -- development under the vision of Psalm 127: PS 127:1 Unless the LORD builds the house, its builders labor in vain. Unless the LORD watches over the city, the watchmen stand guard in vain. [NIV '84] We see here a picture of the God who is not only Creator and Lord, but enters into history, bringing us to repentance and reconciliation, graciously opening the doors for a mutual agreement -- a covenant -- with promises, conditions and blessings. But, before such covenantal blessings can be accessed by the individual, the family or the community, the issue of rebellious, willfully sinful rejection of God must be faced; as Paul outlines in Romans 1 - 2, and with an insight from ch. 13 on love as the keystone of core morality: Rom 1:18 . . . the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of people who suppress the truth by their unrighteousness, 19 because what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world his invisible attributes – his eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, because they are understood through what has been made. So people are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not glorify him as God or give him thanks, but they became futile in their thoughts and their senseless hearts1 were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for an image resembling mortal human beings or birds or four-footed animals or reptiles. 24 Therefore God gave them over in the desires of their hearts to impurity, to dishonor their bodies among themselves. 25 They exchanged the truth of God for a lie and worshiped and served the creation rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! . . . . 28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what should not be done . . . . Rom 2:5 . . . [B]ecause of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath for yourselves in the day of wrath, when God’s righteous judgment is revealed! 6 He will reward each one according to his works: 7 eternal life to those who by perseverance in good works seek glory and honor and immortality, 8 but wrath and anger to those who live in selfish ambition and do not obey the truth but follow unrighteousness . . . . 13 For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous before God, but those who do the law will be declared righteous. 14 For whenever the Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature the things required by the law, these who do not have the law are a law to themselves. 15 They show that the work of the law is written in their hearts, as their conscience bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or else defend them, 16 on the day when God will judge the secrets of human hearts, according to my gospel through Christ Jesus. Rom 13: 8b . . . the one who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law. 9 For the commandments, “Do not commit adultery, do not murder, do not steal, do not covet,” (and if there is any other commandment) are summed up in this, “Love your neighbor as yourself.” 10 Love does no wrong [Thayer: ?????? -1. of a bad nature 2. of a mode of thinking, feeling, acting a. base, wrong, wicked b. not such as it ought to be 3. troublesome, injurious, pernicious, destructive, baneful] to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law. [NET, emphases added] In the apostle's argument, the dismissive rejection of God is always culpable; for there is adequate -- nay, compelling -- evidence in the world outside and the heart, mind and conscience of man inside, to strongly warrant the conclusion that our world is a Creation, and that of a good God. The God under whose moral government we therefore live, through the principle that he has made us equally in his image and thus creates a mutual obligation of respect, love and not doing harm but rather benefit to neighbour. This principle of moral government we can see amplified in John Locke's citation from "the judicious [Anglican Canon Richard] Hooker, in his Ecclesiastical Polity, 1594 +, when Locke sought to ground the principles of liberty and justice in the community, in Ch 2 sect. 5 of his well-known Second Treatise on Civil Government: . . . if I cannot but wish to receive good, even as much at every man's hands, as any man can wish unto his own soul, how should I look to have any part of my desire herein satisfied, unless myself be careful to satisfy the like desire which is undoubtedly in other men . . . my desire, therefore, to be loved of my equals in Nature, as much as possible may be, imposeth upon me a natural duty of bearing to themward fully the like affection. From which relation of equality between ourselves and them that are as ourselves, what several rules and canons natural reason hath drawn for direction of life no man is ignorant . . . [Hooker then continues, citing Aristotle in The Nicomachean Ethics, Bk 8:] as namely, That because we would take no harm, we must therefore do none; That since we would not be in any thing extremely dealt with, we must ourselves avoid all extremity in our dealings; That from all violence and wrong we are utterly to abstain, with such-like . . . ] [Eccl. Polity,preface, Bk I, "ch." 8, p.80, cf. here. Emphasis added.] In short, the apostle holds that people who turn from God and the evidence that points to him, are in willful error; an error that then tends to eat away at the bonds between ourselves and others whom God has made just as much in his image as we ourselves. However, people thus have reasonable moral expectations that we must respect their dignity as created just like ourselves, equally in God's image, and with their own individual calling under God to a path of good and achievement. So, we can have no just right to hinder our neighbour by violating life, liberty, property, reputation etc. But, too often, instead of living together in harmonious community under our common good, reasonable, just Creator, Father, God and Lord, we instead make up distracting stories and images that look like men, birds, beasts, reptiles etc. In the old days, such were in pagan temples. Given the sort of question-begging a priori materialism posed by Lewontin and so many others, too often, nowadays, such images and stories appear as "educational" or even "scientific" exhibits in museums, textbooks, TV documentaries and "science" web sites. So, we may draw a provocative comparison: Then: Now: Paul's point is that when we set up such images and spin out such beguiling stories in the teeth of the evidence and implications we know or should easily enough know [cf. here on and here on below] about our world and our own selves, we fall victim to a willfully ignorant, rebellious en-darkened mind and a benumbed conscience; one that ironically often sees itself as wise and right. It is then no wonder that our passions spin out of control, and we become benumbed to our shameful, destructive and debasing addictions and willful abuse of the other. Hence Paul's caution to Christians in Ephesians 4: Eph 4: 17 . . . I say this, and insist in the Lord, that you no longer live as the Gentiles do, in the futility of their thinking. 18 They are darkened in their understanding, being alienated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them due to the hardness of their hearts. 19 Because they are callous, they have given themselves over to indecency for the practice of every kind of impurity with greediness. 20 But you did not learn about Christ like this, 21 if indeed you heard about him and were taught in him, just as the truth is in Jesus. 22 You were taught with reference to your former way of life to lay aside the old man who is being corrupted in accordance with deceitful desires, 23 to be renewed in the spirit of your mind, 24 and to put on the new man who has been created in God’s image – in righteousness and holiness that comes from truth. [NET] Wilfully rebellious, endarkened, calloused cultures such as Paul here describes, go into moral spin-out, crash and burn. That sounds rather sadly like early C21 Western Civilisation, but we will predictably hear the hot retort: Science shows that there is no evidence for God, and your out-dated religion is in a losing war against ever-advancing knowledge! Is that really so? Let us see . . . }} >>>>>>>>>>> We begin. KFkairosfocus
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
07:34 AM
7
07
34
AM
PDT
kairosfocus @ 321: I will take some time to examine those links, thank you. One of the strengths in my selection of Daniel's prophecy of the 69 weeks is that its assertions are entirely demonstrable from forensic evidence of archaeology, astronomy, calendrics, philology, numsimatics, and history - i.e. "extra biblical" evidence of the sort often demanded to be credible. Demonstrating credibly, forensically, that the future revealed in Daniel's prophecy could only be known by a supernatural being is proof that God exists and that Jesus is the foretold Messiah. From that fundamental truth, it follows that what God and Jesus have said elsewhere in the Bible, is likewise true. That the extrabiblical forensic evidence is both credible and irrefutable, is demonstrated by the silence of the atheists.Charles
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
07:32 AM
7
07
32
AM
PDT
AS, even if he has fabricated a narrative about teaching students in China, surely he can find himself ten or a dozen knockdown questions unanswerable by those ignorant, stupid, insane or wicked right wing fundy Christofascists who cannot stand up to atheistical brites? It would be interesting to see such. Or, is it that he is scared that he cannot put up something that would stand informed scrutiny? At this point, it looks like this thread needs to go on to address the core warrant for the Christian faith. KFkairosfocus
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
07:28 AM
7
07
28
AM
PDT
re: rvb8's questions I wouldn't put it past an Atheist Troll to present UD with complete fabrications. There are no questions. Andrewasauber
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
07:11 AM
7
07
11
AM
PDT
Charles, somewhere above, I believe, there are links here on. There is also a RH side-bar with considerably more, e.g. this link on 20 arguments pointing to God and the page that includes this on on grounding a theistic worldview and then a specifically Christian one, with an onward discussion of positive socio-cultural transformation. And that is on top of what you have said. I wonder what AJ has to say for himself on his no evidence provided claims. KFkairosfocus
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
07:01 AM
7
07
01
AM
PDT
RVB8, On April 22 you said that that evening you would sit with students and share a "list" of questions for their Christian leaders. I asked that you do us the reasonable service of allowing us to see the list. Since then, no list. Kindly, explain why that is so. KFkairosfocus
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
06:52 AM
6
06
52
AM
PDT
rvb8 @ 290
a list of questions for their new found friends. You and your ilk, are indeed my bread and butter.
We're still waiting on your list of questions for Christians. c'mon rvb8, disabuse me. I'm your Huckleberry.Charles
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
06:49 AM
6
06
49
AM
PDT
AnimatedDust @ 316:
On the day, AJ won’t be able to say, “But but–I did not have enough evidence!”
Yes, Armand Jacks intended it for trolling, but God intended it for a court record.Charles
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
06:39 AM
6
06
39
AM
PDT
kairosfocus @ 315
The usual rule of thumb is, do not feed the trolls, they thrive on attention. if they become unduly disruptive, disciplinary measures will be needed, if necessary up to banning. So far, AJ has had to be warned by the blog president and by others, and on such warning has pulled back just this side of banning for cause.
Yes I feed them, rope, to the point where they have obviously hung themselves and become an embrassment to the atheist, materialist narrative. I also make it a point to memorialize their exposure, in a comment or two, so it can be linked from some other thread when they feign ignorance/innocence at having been caught out again for the same stupidity. The noose is reusable. Months from now, when someone happens across this thread, they'll see the abject stupidity exhibited by atheists who not only claim to be "bright" but also claim a lack of evidence for God and Jesus. Their studied avoidance of addressing that evidence, driven by their fear of losing the argument, will serve as a monument to the intellectual bankruptcy of the atheist/materialist narrative.Charles
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
05:58 AM
5
05
58
AM
PDT
Charles, again, thank you for your comprehensive scholarship. On the day, AJ won't be able to say, "But but--I did not have enough evidence!" So sad. His deep desire for this not to be true comes through like a spotlight.AnimatedDust
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
04:20 AM
4
04
20
AM
PDT
Charles, AJ is an obvious evo mat or fellow traveller activist trolling UD, for one or more of various reasons, mostly distractive and clearly not to actually responsibly interact with substance. The usual rule of thumb is, do not feed the trolls, they thrive on attention. if they become unduly disruptive, disciplinary measures will be needed, if necessary up to banning. So far, AJ has had to be warned by the blog president and by others, and on such warning has pulled back just this side of banning for cause. He needs to know that I have a very low tolerance for vulgarity for cause, and will not tolerate even the use of notorious abbreviations and also accusations without serious merit. if someone cannot keep a civil tongue in his or her head in a public space discussion, that is already a sign that this person is grossly irresponsible and essentially empty-headed, disrespectful and abusive. For our context where there is a widespread misunderstanding, so it is appropriate to answer substantial issues -- without allowing permanent diversion of the discussion. But if someone shows lack of responsibility, refocus on the main theme of the thread from its OP on and if necessary address whatever is really relevant in passing. In this thread's case, obviously, we have gone through several themes and have established the broad philosophical context for worldviews [now in a secondary thread, itself facing trollishness] and demonstrated the difference and independence between the design inference and a theistic case. That is very important, as there is a slander out there that tries to portray the design inference and associated scientific themes with some silly but widely swallowed conspiracy theory about creationist, fundamentalist, right-wing, Christofascist takeovers of our civilisation. Nonsense that fails to understand that fascism -- as the blackshirts in Berkeley are demonstrating as we speak -- is demonstrably a left wing socialist, statist, politically messianistic personality cult. Second, as the UD Weak Argument Correctives that such trolls refuse to read or take seriously discusses, Biblical Creationism and Design thought have very different frames of thought. Inferring design as credible cause on empirically tested reliable sign has very little inherently to do with scriptural traditions and raising the challenge of Job 38, were you there at the point of origins, then debating hermeneutics of text and correlation with evidence of traces from the past of origins. If you doubt, go over to Answers in Genesis etc and compare. But then truthfulness and responsibility are not hallmarks of trollishness. This thread has also done an important service by addressing the core warranting case for the Christian faith, which has long been under unjustifiably severe attack in our civilisation, to our sobering cost. As just one indicator, were the Christian Faith as dominant as these trolls paint, there is just no way that such would parade themselves in public to enable the ongoing slaughter of the unborn, 800+ millions since the 1970's and mounting up at a million per WEEK. An utter indictment of the utterly demonic nature of what has been going on in our ever more radically secularised culture. The thief comes to steal, to kill and to destroy. That enabling behaviour for ONGOING HOLOCAUST alone utterly demonstrates the benumbing of conscience at work, which -- as we can see form the link between moral government and responsible rational freedom and thought -- is vital to sound, rational, responsible thinking. Indeed, part of what is exposed above, is that such trolls do not even understand the significance of the first fact of our experience, conscious rationality sensitised by conscience. Instead, under the influence of self-refuting evo mat scientism and fellow traveller ideologies (notice, how they duck, dodge and side-step this), they imagine that a computational substrate is adequate to account for rational, insightful ground and consequence inference. They cannot bring themselves to acknowledge what anyone who has designed and built such a substrate can tell you. First, it is necessarily chock full of FSCO/I and its appearance is a strong sign of design as cause. Second, that it is blindly mechanical and/or stochastic in nature, GIGO limited in capability and utterly unintelligent. What we have is automated utterly blind calculation, or analogue dynamics, that will happily play out errors until the system crashes. The Pentium and 386 recalls should establish that beyond any reasonable, responsible doubt. The decades of effort to create ball and disk integrator based analogue computers that did good gunlaying, should also tell us a lot. Likewise, neural networks, even in wetware, are about signal processing, not concepts, inferences, intuitions, creative insight etc. Artificial intelligence is a misnomer. In short, the trolls cannot even account for the conscience-guided reasoning power they must use to comment. They should stand down and take time to ponder what sort of world must we inhabit, for creatures like us to be possible. And in that context the answer comes back, there is one serious candidate world root for a world with morally governed embodied responsible, rationally free agents like us: a world created by the inherently good creator God, a necessary and maximally great being, worthy of loyalty and the reasonable, responsible, free service of doing the good in accord with our evident nature. Which points to objectivity of moral law and to the reason why it is those who reject that root who end up in having to impose the devillish nihilistic premise that might and manipulation make 'truth' 'right' etc. It would be amusing, if it were not so sad, to see how these objectors dodge the challenge of comparative difficulties: propose an alternative that is coherent and adequately accounts for our world: ________ That consistently empty blank, so for years, speaks eloquent volumes. In this context where ethical theism is a serious and responsible worldview option, the history and traditions and scriptures and message of the Judaeo-Christian faith tradition can be reasonably examined. After all, if we are the creation of the inherently good God, whom we ought to joyously serve with reasonable, responsible service, then it should be no surprise that he is there and is not silent. Nor, that the principal locus of his revelatory activity should be in the central pivot of our world, the place from which it would be most able to spread, that joint between three continents in the Levant, next door to Egypt. And in that light, it should be no surprise that the civlisaiton informed by that tradition, should become a driving force for genuine progress, never mind set-backs and the ever existing reformation struggle with domineering evil and infectious corruption in the world. So, yes, your challenge to examine the evidence of messianistic prophecy is relevant, and the message of the resurrection also. It is almost amusing, but then sad, to see that inter alia, none of the objectors above seem to have seriously interacted with you or with Lee Stroebel's Case for Christ video embedded above. Likewise, we see one who boasts of subverting little lambs of the faith, who seems afraid to let us see the list of challenges he poses to them. Maybe, he will let us see, soon. (I would have thought, if they were utterly unanswerable, he would be eager to expose our folly and ignorance here by boldly posting them.) And so, this thread has life yet. KFkairosfocus
April 25, 2017
April
04
Apr
25
25
2017
01:07 AM
1
01
07
AM
PDT
Armand Jacks @ 313
If you are not willing to do something as simple as that then I am afraid that I must say goodnight.
Since you can't do something as simple as scroll to comments listed and see they are addressed to you and quote you, verbatim, then say goodnight. The adults are going to talk after you kids go to bed.Charles
April 24, 2017
April
04
Apr
24
24
2017
08:21 PM
8
08
21
PM
PDT
Charles:
You ignored them at 184, 296, 298, and 300. But you can’t scroll up to find out, can you.
You behave just like KF. And that's not a compliment. I ask a simple question and you keep referring to a number of comments addressed to others. Pick the one piece of evidence you feel most compelling and I will respond to it. If I can't address it adequately then you win. If I do then you can bring up your second most compelling piece. If you are not willing to do something as simple as that then I am afraid that I must say goodnight.Armand Jacks
April 24, 2017
April
04
Apr
24
24
2017
08:10 PM
8
08
10
PM
PDT
Armand Jacks @ 311
It is Charles who claimed that I have ignored numerous of his challenges
You ignored them at 184, 296, 298, and 300. But you can't scroll up to find out, can you.Charles
April 24, 2017
April
04
Apr
24
24
2017
07:48 PM
7
07
48
PM
PDT
KF:
Charles, AJ is on his favourite trollish gambit, distracting from an issue by pretending that one of his demands has not been answered.
Oh BS KF. It is Charles who claimed that I have ignored numerous of his challenges even though he had only addressed a single comment to me, pointing towards comments he had addressed to others. I asked him to identify one of the challenges he would like me to respond to and he has refused. If he wants to be childish, I can't stop him.
PS: I continue concern about BA77, he seems incommunicado. I am hoping he is not ill.
If you really cared you could take the ten seconds it would take to notice that he continues to be very active on his Facebook page. It is only UD that he is shunning. Either voluntarily or forced.Armand Jacks
April 24, 2017
April
04
Apr
24
24
2017
07:39 PM
7
07
39
PM
PDT
kairosfocus @ 309
Charles, AJ is on his favourite trollish gambit, distracting from an issue by pretending that one of his demands has not been answered.
Of course he is. That's all he's got. It's all he'll ever have. And it has been laid bare just how intellectually bankrupt and childish are the atheist/materialist excuses to ignore the facts. They won't scroll up - that is the nadir of excuses.Charles
April 24, 2017
April
04
Apr
24
24
2017
07:27 PM
7
07
27
PM
PDT
Charles, AJ is on his favourite trollish gambit, distracting from an issue by pretending that one of his demands has not been answered. He is also tossing in a selectively hyperskeptical dismissal of evidence -- a significant summary body of which is in or is linked from the thread above -- regarding God and Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ. All of this tells us about the crooked yardstick he is using to measure by. Of course, as well, buried in the lot is the little matter of a challenge to RVB8 to pick on someone his own size. Sad. KF PS: I continue concern about BA77, he seems incommunicado. I am hoping he is not ill.kairosfocus
April 24, 2017
April
04
Apr
24
24
2017
07:08 PM
7
07
08
PM
PDT
Armand Jacks @ 307
I offered.
But you didn't scroll up. 'course you, and everyone here, already knew that. Maybe you should just go over to "The Skeptical Zone" and see if they'll put you in their witless protection program.Charles
April 24, 2017
April
04
Apr
24
24
2017
06:03 PM
6
06
03
PM
PDT
Charles:
You don’t need to. You just need to do your work for yourself and scroll up [or is that grow up?]
Suit yourself. I offered.Armand Jacks
April 24, 2017
April
04
Apr
24
24
2017
05:48 PM
5
05
48
PM
PDT
Armand Jacks @ 305
I don’t see why I should do your work for you.
You don't need to. You just need to do your work for yourself and scroll up [or is that grow up?]Charles
April 24, 2017
April
04
Apr
24
24
2017
05:42 PM
5
05
42
PM
PDT
1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 18