Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Practical Biology (Not)

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Yet another ancestor to modern whales is hypothesized. It’s hard to believe people get paid to produce stuff like this.

Whales may be related to deer-like beast

By SETH BORENSTEIN
AP Science Writer
Wed Dec 19, 6:55 PM ET

WASHINGTON – The gigantic ocean-dwelling whale may have evolved from a land animal the size of a small raccoon, new research suggests. What might be the missing evolutionary link between whales and land animals is an odd animal that looks like a long-tailed deer without antlers or an overgrown long-legged rat, fossils indicate.

The creature is called Indohyus, and recently unearthed fossils reveal some crucial evolutionary similarities between it and water-dwelling cetaceans, such as whales, dolphins and porpoises.

For years, the hippo has been the leading candidate for the closest land relative because of its similar DNA and whale-like features. So some scientists were skeptical of the new hypothesis by an Ohio anatomy professor whose work was being published Thursday in the journal Nature.

Still, some researchers have been troubled that hippos seem to have lived in the wrong part of the world and popped up too recently to be a whale ancestor.

Newer fossils point to the deer-like Indohyus. The animal is a “missing link” to the sister species to ancient whales, said Hans Thewissen, an anatomy professor at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine.

Read more…

Comments
Atom, No but then I am city boy. I think I may have found a photgraph of the elusive whale ancestor/pig-dog here: http://www.howlinmoonbakery.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/pig_costume1.jpgJehu
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
02:12 PM
2
02
12
PM
PDT
Jehu, you've never seen a "dig" or closely related "pog"? lolAtom
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
01:21 PM
1
01
21
PM
PDT
This cracks me up, from the article,
"The earliest whales didn't look like whales at all," Thewissen said. "It looked like a cross between a pig and a dog."
A cross between a pig and a dog? LOL!Jehu
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
01:04 PM
1
01
04
PM
PDT
Gil, you are right. Still, I hope they keep on producing this stuff. I really miss the "World News" in the grocery store check out lines. I'd hate to see another major source of humor go away.Jack Golightly
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
12:29 PM
12
12
29
PM
PDT
Hello Everyone, Can someone here offer an ID-based hypothesis for the origin of cetaceans with at least as much explanatory power as the comparative anatomical approach described in the article? Have a great holiday, MichaelMichael Tuite
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
10:42 AM
10
10
42
AM
PDT
Laugh if you like at Thewissen's naivete, but for those who believe (and not all ID proponents do) that whales were designed as a separate group (Order Cetacea), the following quote from the article must seem troubling: "The earliest whales didn't look like whales at all," Thewissen said. "It (sic) looked like a cross between a pig and a dog." I think there's a very strong case to be made for the design of the biochemical nano-machinery which is common to living organisms. I acknowledge that the transition from a land-dwelling animal to a sea creature is extremely difficult to envisage, but I am far less certain that the cetacean ear was designed than I am that DNA was. We need to pick our fights carefully, when making the case for the design of certain biological structures.vjtorley
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
09:27 AM
9
09
27
AM
PDT
Evolution is smarter than you, IDiots [I couldn't resist...]Enezio E. De Almeida Filho
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
08:08 AM
8
08
08
AM
PDT
Pardon my naivete, but don't really really big animals (like whales that can weigh 200 tons) need all sorts of different homeostatic mechanisms to control body heat, etc. compared with much smaller deer/rat-like creatures? Silly me, of course evolution can produce these mechanisms -- it created everything else.William Dembski
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
07:13 AM
7
07
13
AM
PDT
Humor indeed. At some time in the future, scientists will look back on this stuff and shake their heads in amazement. It will be considered as scientific as bloodletting for curing infections. Of particular noteworthiness is the fact that this nonsense gets published in the popular press all the time, with no hint of skepticism on the part of editors and journalists. So brainwashed are they by the Darwinian priesthood that they will buy anything uncritically.GilDodgen
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
06:51 AM
6
06
51
AM
PDT
here is more :) Oh my DEER! That is amazing! I'm not buying into that BS, nor into that of the Hippo. Give me a break. The DEERWHALE (this is not fictitious) A long long long long long time ago there was a deer like animal called Prolly. Prolly lived near the big oceans and it loved water. One day the deer Prolly got as big as a whale cause it swallowed too much water, and then all of a sudden it noticed that it didn't drown, like its brother Todd a million years earlier. So it started to feed on plankton and Prolly was the happiest mammal ever! (please feel free to add to the story) ... Be assured, that it is scientific.tb
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
06:35 AM
6
06
35
AM
PDT
This is the kind of just-so story that Judge Jones would swallow hook, line, and sinker.Larry Fafarman
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
05:58 AM
5
05
58
AM
PDT
This is funny...sad, but funny.shaner74
December 20, 2007
December
12
Dec
20
20
2007
05:37 AM
5
05
37
AM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply