Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Sabine Hossenfelder tackles trans women in women’s sports

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

And ends by saying that childhood genetic engineering will probably bring an end to high achiever sports altogether:

In 2019 a team of European researchers from the Netherlands, Norway and Belgium measured the change in grip strength for trans people after a year of hormonal therapy. They had about 250 trans women and trans men each who participated in their study. So this isn’t a huge sample but decent.

They found that grip strength decreased in trans women by minus 1 point 8 kilogram but increased in trans men by 6 point 1 kilogram. In trans men, but not in trans women, the change in grip strength was associated with change in lean body mass. So it seems that hormonal therapy does more for trans men than for trans women.

Another team of researchers from Sweden followed 11 untrained trans women and 12 untrained trans men before and up to one year after gender-affirming hormonal therapy.

They found that in trans women thigh muscle volume decreased by 5 percent and quadriceps cross-sectional area decreased by 4 percent, but muscle density remained unchanged and they roughly maintained their strength levels. In trans men, on the other hand, thigh muscle volume increased by 15 percent; quadriceps cross-sectional area also increased by 15 percent, muscle density increased by 6 percent, and they saw increased strength levels. Again it seems that hormonal therapy does more for trans men than for trans women.

It’d be rather tedious to list all the papers, so let me just say that this finding has been reproduced numerous times.

Sabine Hossenfelder, “Trans athletes in women’s sports: Is this fair?” at BackRe(Action) (June 4, 2022)

The rest of Hossenfelder’s take feels like it is aimed at avoiding watching her career sail off a cliff.

Hmmm. It is interesting that recently, Dave Chappelle, Bill Marr, and Ricky Gervais, American comics, have been able to say pretty much what they want on transgender claims — not without provoking rage — but without getting Canceled.

Comments
JHolo, so you are for biological men competing in women's sports? and/or you think that society would be better for it?bornagain77
June 5, 2022
June
06
Jun
5
05
2022
08:10 AM
8
08
10
AM
PDT
P: I think the tide has turned on this issue.
I tend to agree. It is like any other fundamental change in society. Initially there tends to be hyperbolic, civilization-ending rhetoric on both sides of an issue, followed by a general acceptance with, where necessary, some limitations. We saw it with women’s rights, the civil rights movement, desegregation, inter-racial marriage, the acceptance of homosexuality. Later we saw it with same sex marriage, gay couples adopting and now with transgendered rights. In the end, it all works out and civilization is the better for it.JHolo
June 5, 2022
June
06
Jun
5
05
2022
07:59 AM
7
07
59
AM
PDT
On top of "Women’s internal organs are compressed," we also find that "a full third of our genome is behaving very differently in men and women."
The genetic difference between men and women,,, - 06 Nov 2017 Excerpt: a full third of our genome is behaving very differently in men and women. These new data pose challenges for science, medicine and maybe even gender equity. The human genome Men and women have practically the same set of about 20,000 genes.,,, They found that about one third of these genes (more than 6,500) had very different activities in men and women. Some genes were active in men only or women only. Many genes were far more active in one sex or the other. A few of these genes showed sex biased activity in every tissue of the body. More commonly, the difference was seen in one or a few tissues. Most of these genes were not on sex chromosomes: only a few lay on the Y or the X. How could a third of our genes be differently controlled in men and women? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/11/throughout-our-bodies-thousands-of-genes-act-differently-in-men-and-women
As well, there is a marked difference found in how men and women's brains are 'wired'.
How Men's Brains Are Wired Differently than Women's Male brains have more connections within hemispheres to optimize motor skills, whereas female brains are more connected between hemispheres to combine analytical and intuitive thinking By Tanya Lewis, December 2, 2013 Excerpt: "On average, men connect front to back [parts of the brain] more strongly than women," whereas "women have stronger connections left to right," said study leader Ragini Verma, an associate professor,,, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-mens-brains-are-wired-differently-than-women/
Moreover, Darwinists have no realistic clue how sex could have possibly evolved in the first place,
New book challenges sexual selection theory in evolution – May 20, 2018 Excerpt: Darwin’s Secret Sex Problem What Darwin Ignored,,, Darwin never seriously confronted the crucial, insurmountable gap in his grand theory between asexual replication and sexual reproduction. Nor could Darwins famed natural selection have provided simultaneous on-time delivery of the first male/female pair of millions of sexually unique species required for evolutions bedrock premise of common descent, a fundamental flaw fatal to the romanticized microbe-to-man Evolution Story. https://uncommondescent.com/evolution/new-book-challenges-sexual-selection-theory-in-evolution/ "How did the sexes originate? Why is it that the vast majority of living things require a "male and female" to reproduce? If evolution were true - doesn't it make much more sense that EVERY living organism was self-replicating and required no useless energy expenditure? When did the first male get here? When did the first female get here? How? Why? Wouldn't they have had to appear fully functional and at the same time in order for the next generation of organisms to arrive? Of course, they would. So, how is it that the first male and female for almost 2 million living organisms arrived together and fully functional so that reproduction could take place? "Sex is the QUEEN of evolutionary biology problems." - Dr. Graham Bell - 'The Masterpiece of Nature' The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality - 1982, - The Masterpiece of Nature examines sex as representative of the most important challenge to the modern theory of evolution.,,, Another whack at the “sex paradox” - July 1, 2014 Excerpt: The article is most informative about tests done on the various theses but in the end (they state). And so the paradox of sex lives on. “We still really don’t know the answer to this very most basic question,” says Mark Welch. “We don’t know why sex exists.” https://uncommondescent.com/evolution/another-whack-at-the-sex-paradox/ Knowledge gap on the origin of sex - May 26, 2017 Excerpt: There are significant gaps in our knowledge on the evolution of sex, according to a research review on sex chromosomes. Even after more than a century of study, researchers do not know enough about the evolution of sex chromosomes to understand how males and females emerge. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170526084533.htm
Verse:
Matthew 19:4 “Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’
bornagain77
June 5, 2022
June
06
Jun
5
05
2022
02:07 AM
2
02
07
AM
PDT
I think the tide has turned on this issue.polistra
June 4, 2022
June
06
Jun
4
04
2022
11:09 PM
11
11
09
PM
PDT
No surgery can altar internal organs. Women's internal organs are compressed, including lungs, to make room for growing babies. Those compressed internal organs give a disadvantage in competition requiring stamina.BobRyan
June 4, 2022
June
06
Jun
4
04
2022
10:36 PM
10
10
36
PM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply