Design inference
Human evolution: Another tale of magnified imperfections
Jerry Coyne: The fact that a cat can’t be turned into a dog is not a serious objection to Darwinism!
If the genetic code just plain designed itself, would that be intelligent design?
Hindu-sponsored ID book team now offers documentaries as well
How flowering plants precision engineer their pollination
Bill Dembski: Is there any such thing as information in the abstract or is it always information “for an agent”?
What does Bill Dembski think of David Abel’s “prescriptive information” theory?
Will Illustra now make an ID film about hummingbirds?
They said it: Dr Nick Matzke (late of NCSE) vs UD commenter Joe on science as it studies “the usual course of the world” applied to signs of design
In the course of the exchanges on Dr Matzke’s clip on what “science” says can and cannot be so regarding miracles, he has made an interesting comment, here at 15: . . . I still haven’t seen anyone present a good argument as to why we can’t just say that science is the study of the usual course of events . . . Of course, he — sadly, misleadingly — failed to inform us that this highlighted phrase was taken from my own remarks in the original post (and which were followed up in the thread): It goes without needing emphasis that those who experienced the sequence A –> B –> C . . . here [–> A, the last Read More ›