Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Cosmology: Why the future belongs to intelligent design


In “The accidental universe: Science’s crisis of faith” (Harper’s, December 2011), Alan P. Lightman – a physicist and novelist who teaches at MIT, comments on the multiverse:

Dramatic developments in cosmological findings and thought have led some of the world’s premier physicists to propose that our universe is only one of an enormous number of universes with wildly varying properties, and that some of the most basic features of our particular universe are indeed mere accidents—a random throw of the cosmic dice. In which case, there is no hope of ever explaining our universe’s features in terms of fundamental causes and principles.

It is perhaps impossible to say how far apart the different universes may be, or whether they exist simultaneously in time. Some may have stars and galaxies like ours. Some may not. Some may be finite in size. Some may be infinite. Physicists call the totality of universes the “multiverse.” Alan Guth, a pioneer in cosmological thought, says that “the multiple-universe idea severely limits our hopes to understand the world from fundamental principles.” And the philosophical ethos of science is torn from its roots. As put to me recently by Nobel Prize–winning physicist Steven Weinberg, a man as careful in his words as in his mathematical calculations, “We now find ourselves at a historic fork in the road we travel to understand the laws of nature. If the multiverse idea is correct, the style of fundamental physics will be radically changed.”

The scientists most distressed by Weinberg’s “fork in the road” are theoretical physicists. Theoretical physics is the deepest and purest branch of science. It is the outpost of science closest to philosophy, and religion.

It is as if you walked into a shoe store, had your feet measured, and found that a size 5 would fit you, a size 8 would also fit, and a size 12 would fit equally well. Such wishy-washy results make theoretical physicists extremely unhappy. Evidently, the fundamental laws of nature do not pin down a single and unique universe. According to the current thinking of many physicists, we are living in one of a vast number of universes. We are living in an accidental universe. We are living in a universe uncalculable by science.

No. We aren’t. They are. They decided,on the basis of no particularly compelling evidence, that the universe is not fine-tuned, and now the bill for their fantasy is coming due: No more real science.

Does the universe care about life? Intelligent design is one answer. … Intelligent design, however, is an answer to fine-tuning that does not appeal to most scientists. The multiverse offers another explanation.

If the multiverse idea is correct, then the historic mission of physics to explain all the properties of our universe in terms of fundamental principles—to explain why the properties of our universe must necessarily be what they are—is futile, a beautiful philosophical dream that simply isn’t true.

– Read the whole thing. What Lightman is saying, without directly acknowledging it, is that science, as we have always understood it, now belongs to intelligent design. To those who accept that the universe is what the evidence shows it to be.

As for the others, they and the multiverse have found each other.

KF, Many Thanks for this. Eugene S
Dr ES: Perhaps the cluster of Luke Barnes articles linked at the foot of the post here will help. (Especially note the just put up ArXiv paper.) GEM of TKI kairosfocus
Folks, Does any one know if any rigorous rebuttal of the argument of Ideda & Jefferys has been done? Thanks. Eugene S
Great article IDunno

Leave a Reply