Here’s a term that will not make “Word of the Year”: Belief-ologists
|May 28, 2017||Posted by News under Culture, Naturalism|
From New Scientist:
IT IS just over a decade since Richard Dawkins lit the blue touchpaper with his book The God Delusion. It introduced much of the world to the so-called new atheism – a forceful rejection of religion based on the premise that scientific materialism offers a superior explanation of the universe, while religion is a corrosive influence on society: a pathological meme planted in the minds of defenceless children.
Though a great read and a liberating influence for many closet atheists, The God Delusion largely omitted a new strand of scientific enquiry emerging around the time it was published. Those working on the “science of religion” – a motley crew of psychologists, anthropologists and neuroscientists – explained it as a by-product of normal cognition. Thanks to evolution, they argued, our explanation-seeking minds find religious ideas intuitively appealing, gobbling them up as a hungry trout swallows a fishing fly. More.
In an age when science is falling victim to every form of marchin’, marchin’ quackery, this makes for odd reading indeed
See also: How naturalism rots science from the head down
“Western” math as a dehumanizing tool?
Follow UD News at Twitter!