Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Michael Medved Becomes Discovery Fellow

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Discovery Press Release:

Discovery Institute Names National Talk Show Host Michael Medved as Senior Fellow

SEATTLE — Michael Medved, nationally syndicated talk radio host and bestselling author, has joined the Discovery Institute in the role of senior fellow. The position cements a longstanding friendship and recognizes a commonality of values and projects across a spectrum of issues.

“Michael Medved is an intellectual entrepreneur, a political and cultural polymath with great insights, judgment and wit. We are delighted to have this new relationship with him,” said Discovery Institute president Bruce Chapman.

The sixth largest talk radio audience in the country, 3.7 million listeners, hears Medved’s daily three-hour radio program, The Michael Medved Show. Michael’s show is carried on more than 200 stations across America. The author of several books, including Hollywood vs. America and a recent autobiography, Right Turns, the one-time “punk liberal activist” turned “lovable conservative curmudgeon” is currently at work on a book on The Ten Big Lies About America.

Chapman saluted Medved “as the national radio host—make that ‘media host’—who is best able to understand science issues, including the current conflict over Darwinism and intelligent design. He’s very smart, quick and resourceful. Yet he also is respectful of those he disagrees with.”

“Over the years, I’ve greatly appreciated Discovery’s scholarship and advocacy in many areas,” Medved commented. “We may not agree on every issue, but I often have been struck by how much our worldviews overlap. It has been my pleasure to have Discovery fellows on my show as guests, including Stephen Meyer, Jonathan Wells, and David Klinghoffer. Formalizing the relationship will, I’m sure, only deepen the feeling of collegiality I already have with my friends at Discovery. I look forward to working with Discovery on future projects.”

Medved’s first book, What Really Happened to the Class of ’65?, provided one of the first skeptical reconsiderations of the 1960s counterculture. His tenth book, Right Turns, drew national attention in 2005, offering 35 “unconventional lessons” from Michael’s dramatic political and religious evolution. The New York Times called Right Turns “A provocative memoir… Even many of his readers who hold to very different political and social views will concede, grudgingly, the quality of Medved’s intellect.”

Crown Forum will publish The Ten Big Lies About America, certain to be hugely controversial, in June 2008.

Long active in the Jewish community, Medved has served as president of an Orthodox congregation and co-founder of a Jewish Day School. Since 1996, Michael and his wife, Dr. Diane Medved, a psychologist, have lived in the Seattle area with their three children.

###

Comments
Amen Jerry 22!! Who would want to live in a nation of sheep that mindlessly march to the latest fad, that jump when the elitist says jump, that gullibly swallow the swill of the demagogue? Who would have us go from “the greatest generation” to such self-loathing, from liberty to socialism, from celebrating family to sanctifying sodomy … all with no backlash? Long live the polarization! Besides maybe it’s an antidote to global warming.Rude
November 16, 2007
November
11
Nov
16
16
2007
06:24 AM
6
06
24
AM
PDT
Carl Sachs, When an aggressive irrational force starts to create some resistance in the people they are attacking is this polarization? And if it is, who is creating the polarization? Who is trying to force their will on others? Look to the campuses for the mind set that is creating the polarization. And is it the same people or mind set that is throttling debate on campuses that is creating the polarization in society at large.jerry
November 16, 2007
November
11
Nov
16
16
2007
04:16 AM
4
04
16
AM
PDT
Carl Sachs: "Doesn’t this polarization of culture, politics, and science worry anyone?" Count me too in the worried club. For me, the only issue is: fanatic scientism (including darwinism, AI theories, materialist neurology, and deformations of the philosophy of science) which seems to dominate in scientific clture today, against open scientific inquiry and theorization (including ID and many other things), which tries, from a minority situation, to correctly infer from the available data and to change the intolerant dogmatism of the existing scientific ideology. All that has nothing to do, for me, with politics and religion and general philosophies of the world (although, obviously, it has consequences in all those fields). The privilege of science (I mean true, healthy science) is to pursue the truth as much as possible, notwithstanding all the heavy influences which politics, religion and ideology constantly exert on that pursuit. ID is true science. It has nothing to do with religion or politics. Moreover, ID is much more important than any of its supporters. ID supporters have, obviously, their politic and religious views, and it is perfectly natural that they express them even in the context of ID discussion. I have no objections to that. But the true ID debate has nothing to do with all that, and it is really the true ID debate which has the power to revolution the present cultural trend, and not its apparent political and religious connotations. So, we can well tolerate the political and religious discussions in the ID community, but believe me, those are not the real ID thing. The real ID thing is a scientific revolution, and it can (and should) be embraced by all, liberal and conservative, religious and atheists, provided they are sincerely in search of an objective scientific truth.gpuccio
November 16, 2007
November
11
Nov
16
16
2007
03:39 AM
3
03
39
AM
PDT
Interestingly, two religious Jews, Michael Medved and Dennis Prager, played a role in my abandonment of atheism in favor of Christianity. Medved and Prager are two of the most brilliant and effective defenders of Christianity I have ever encountered. Of course, there were other significant factors, like the realization that the universe and living systems are the product of foresight and design. This is an empirical no-brainer based on modern science. I'm sure that both Medved and Prager would be pleased with the influence they have had upon me. The interesting thing about Prager and Medved is that they recognize a very simple fact: Judaism and Christianity have been the most powerful civilizing influences in the history of the world. If one judges worldviews on their fruits, there is no comparison. A significant case can also be made that the Judeo-Christian tradition and worldview were responsible for the instigation of scientific inquiry and the scientific method.GilDodgen
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
09:26 PM
9
09
26
PM
PDT
Carl Sachs, "Doesn’t this polarization of culture, politics, and science worry anyone?" It worries me, see post #1 above. I fear that the twinning of the scientific question of biological origins and these other social equations is going to be the death nell to the Discovery Institute, and potentially to the public discourse on Intelligent Design.bFast
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
09:17 PM
9
09
17
PM
PDT
It smacks of tokenism to me. Perhaps they thought they needed a Jewish guy to offset all of the talk about the DI being a Christian dominionist organization.
Actually, there's no need. Medved sounds *exactly* like a Christian fundamentalist on his show. I don't think there is an iota of difference between them (except for Jesus thing, which means many people around here think he's going to Hell with the rest of us non-Christians).tyke
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
08:46 PM
8
08
46
PM
PDT
Let me just make sure I understand how this whole thing is being played out: liberalism/materialism/theism/Darwinism vs. conservativism/monotheism/design theory Doesn't this polarization of culture, politics, and science worry anyone? I know it's got me worried. Am I the only one here who thinks that this polarization and divisiveness is a symptom of some bigger problem?Carl Sachs
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
08:36 PM
8
08
36
PM
PDT
It's about time that te DI recognized Medved as an excellent voice for ID. He can communicate effectivly with teh target audience.IrishFather412
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
07:35 PM
7
07
35
PM
PDT
Is there a link to listen to this guys show online? For once, I can say that all the reviewers above me gave good RELATED reviews :) I think geoffrobinson stated exactly what was on my m ind when he said "I wonder who the first person will be to ignore his Orthodox Judaism and say he is a Fundamentalist Christian."gore
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
07:18 PM
7
07
18
PM
PDT
Most media people are liberals. And just as materialism is the organized religion of the school system (and Darwinism its creation story), liberalism - in its modern form - is the social policy arm of materialism.
http://post-darwinist.blogspot.com/2006/08/liberalism-as-social-policy-arm-of.htmlruss
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
07:17 PM
7
07
17
PM
PDT
It smacks of tokenism to me.
Medved lives in Seattle, has very good rapport with American Christians, and has had DI people on his show. If you want to take a cynical position, it would make more sense to say they're using him for his radio microphone. But there's no reason to be cynical. Jews and Chrisitians both have an interest in prying science and materialism apart.russ
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
06:24 PM
6
06
24
PM
PDT
Glarson24: I don't get Medved's Sasquatch thing, but he's done way too much in his life to be dismissed for this one unconventional view.russ
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
06:18 PM
6
06
18
PM
PDT
It smacks of tokenism to me. Perhaps they thought they needed a Jewish guy to offset all of the talk about the DI being a Christian dominionist organization. Makes as much sense as David Berlinski or Wells the moonie, I guess.Stanton Rockwell
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
06:16 PM
6
06
16
PM
PDT
Michael Medved? Who's next? Ann Coulter?tdean
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
06:14 PM
6
06
14
PM
PDT
I think ID needs more Christians, like BA77 and Denyse O'Leary, not Sasquatch believers. I'm not sure even the Big Tent is big enough for this - What are the DI braintrust thinking? From his website: Dan Sytman, Michael's long-time producer and now highly successful co-host of his own morning show, once saw Bigfoot at the edge of a summer camp in the woods. Even before meeting Dan, Michael was a passionate believer in Sasquatch. http://www.michaelmedved.com/pg/jsp/general/biography.jspGlarson24
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
05:06 PM
5
05
06
PM
PDT
Collin, Which liberal groups so you suppose would think that ID is a good idea?? The ScubaredneckThe Scubaredneck
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
04:57 PM
4
04
57
PM
PDT
I am a conservative, but I would like the DI to reach out to liberal (or other) groups so that ID is not seen (to the extent that it isn't already) as a conservative American idea.Collin
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
04:46 PM
4
04
46
PM
PDT
I wonder who the first person will be to ignore his Orthodox Judaism and say he is a Fundamentalist Christian.geoffrobinson
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
04:36 PM
4
04
36
PM
PDT
Nothing I have heard from Medved on his radio show when he talks about creationism leads me to believe that this is a good move.tyke
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
03:38 PM
3
03
38
PM
PDT
This is good news. I am a fan of Medved AND Discovery Institute. When Ben Stein was on O'Reilley, it highlighted the fact that even sympathetic commentators can harm the cause because they do not understand the issues. (Even Panda's Thumb was gloating about it the next day.) The top conservative commentators need to go to school about ID. (Expect nothing from liberals.) Maybe Michael Medved will help. He gets it.prhean
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
02:47 PM
2
02
47
PM
PDT
bFast, this is good news. Michael's radio show, coupled with the Expelled movie, and Denyse O'Leary's print journalism will break the liberal stranglehold on science media. The Darwinists are losing the PR battle and their so-called science will crumble right behind it.poachy
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
01:28 PM
1
01
28
PM
PDT
I must admit, I find this news scary. This website already seems to have married itself to the global warming issue. If the discovery institute marries itself to Americanism, and to American conservativism, all reasonable issues, it will dilute the primary message of the institute. I ask that you please avoid having the Discovery Institute become the American Conservative Institute. If it does, I fear that the cause of Intelligent Design will suffer.bFast
November 15, 2007
November
11
Nov
15
15
2007
01:16 PM
1
01
16
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply