Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Pastafarians not giving up their claim to be a religion

Categories
Culture
Darwinism
Naturalism
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

The claim was recently dismissed by a judge. From Atlas Obscura:

Since its introduction in 2005, the mythology of Pastafarianism has grown to encompass pirates, an afterlife with a beer volcano, and more. There is, of course, a snazzy orientation video to welcome you into the Flying Spaghetti Monster’s noodly arms:

Spaghetti, Wenches & Metaphysics: Episode 1—The FSM from Matt Tillman on Vimeo.

In fact, Pastafarianism is an officially recognized religion in three countries—first in Poland, where it became an officially registered religious community in 2014 thanks to a legal technicality, then in the Netherlands this past January. And just this weekend, New Zealand recognized the first legally-binding Pastafarian wedding, officiated by “minestroni” Karen Martyn. The happy couple were wed in the customary pirate’s garb, and Martyn is ready to perform additional ceremonies for any legally eligible adults, explaining to the BBC, “I’ve had people from Russia, from Germany, from Denmark, from all over contacting me and wanting me to marry them in the church because of our non-discriminatory philosophy.” More.

The underlying purpose may be to bring religion into disrepute by organized silliness.

A central characteristic of traditionally recognized religions, protected by conscience rights, is that, whether one thinks them right or wrong, sensible or silly, people do believe them. One somehow knows that these people do not believe what they say.

The result of successful legal challenges would be to undermine the importance of honest belief and conscience as such in determining cases involving religion.

See also: Wow: Court rules for common sense… Flying Spaghetti Monster not a religion Pastafarianism was so obviously a regional cultural parody, and yet… Maybe it’s instructive that it was a North American judge who figured that one out.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
The underlying purpose may be to bring religion into disrepute by organized silliness. A central characteristic of traditionally recognized religions, protected by conscience rights, is that, whether one thinks them right or wrong, sensible or silly, people do believe them. One somehow knows that these people do not believe what they say.
I think there are several underlying purposes, some more serious than others. In my view, one serious purpose is to challenge the notion of state-recognized religions.daveS
April 18, 2016
April
04
Apr
18
18
2016
08:12 AM
8
08
12
AM
PST
It would probably be instructive to recall the life of B-grade Sci-Fi writer, L. Ron Hubbard when he invented a new religion, "dianetics". Rumor has it that his attempts to tell everyone it was a mistake, ended up with him being silenced. Starting religions are not for the faint of heart--they are usually far more dangerous than they appear. Why? C.S. Lewis argues in "The Last Battle" and "That Hideous Strength" that religions have a way of eating you. I use the phrase "positive feedback". You get back much more than you put in, and since you invented the thing yourself, you get a giant-sized version of yourself back. I will confidently predict that as soon as popularity leads to real money for Pastafarians, the first "pastafarian homicide" will occur in about 5 years, preceded by some sort of expensive "licensing" of minestronis. Count on it.Robert Sheldon
April 18, 2016
April
04
Apr
18
18
2016
08:10 AM
8
08
10
AM
PST
1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply