Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Darwinists open fire on epigenetics

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Some starving hack got it in the neck. From Nature News:

Researcher under fire for New Yorker epigenetics article

A story about epigenetics in the 2 May issue of The New Yorker has been sharply criticized for inaccurately describing how genes are regulated. The article by Siddhartha Mukherjee — a physician, cancer researcher and award-winning author at Columbia University in New York — examines how environmental factors can change the activity of genes without altering the DNA sequence. Jerry Coyne, an evolutionary ecologist at the University of Chicago in Illinois, posted two widely discussed blog posts calling the piece “superficial and misleading”, largely because it ignored key aspects of gene regulation. Other researchers quoted in the blog posts called the piece “horribly damaging” and “a truly painful read”. Mukherjee responded by publishing a point-by-point rebuttal online. Speaking to Nature, he says he now realizes that he erred by omitting key areas of the science, but that he didn’t mean to mislead. “I sincerely thought that I had done it justice,” he says.

Mukherjee’s article, ‘Same But Different’, takes a personal view of epigenetics — a term whose definition is highly contentious in the field. The story features his mother and aunt, identical twins who have distinct personalities. Mukherjee, who won a Pulitzer Prize in 2011 for his best-selling book The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer (Scribner, 2010), writes that identical twins differ because: “Chance events — injuries, infections, infatuations; the haunting trill of that particular nocturne — impinge on one twin and not on the other.More.

Sure. So?*

Oh, wait…

The New Yorker is standing by its honest writer. But Manhattan cocktails will not defeat Darwin thugs. Mukherjee’s been warned by the thugs that he “stepped on a land mine. ”

To understand why Darwin’s boys have a problem with epigenetics, see Epigenetic change: Lamarck, wake up, you’re wanted in the conference room!

The reality Darwin’s boys inhabit does not include epigenetics. That settles it if all you want is Manhattans.

* Trivia: O’Leary for News grew up in the largest baby boom in the Western world, which of course meant encountering lots of twins, including identicals. Curiously, the big problem was parents who enforced identicalness because it was cute. But the twins rebelled. Teachers fought back by putting the twins in separate classrooms. Nothing was like the cute pictures. But the pictures are cute. Maybe the science, not so much.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
Soundburger at 1, in some circles, "starving hack" is a term of distinction. Someone with a solid story Mr. Big don't like.News
May 10, 2016
May
05
May
10
10
2016
05:42 PM
5
05
42
PM
PDT
why belittle the writer by calling him a 'starving hack'? It appears that he is neither.soundburger
May 10, 2016
May
05
May
10
10
2016
05:39 PM
5
05
39
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply