Darwinism Evolution

Berlinski’s Darwinian Doubts

August 14, 2005 William DembskiComment(0)

Spread the love

In case you missed this when it came out: http://www.uncommondescent.com/documentation/Berlinski_Darwinian_Doubts.pdf.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

bornagain77 Seversky, you really need to preface your statements with the qualifier of 'there is no evidence that I will personally... – Can logic or evidence help you...
Seversky The Hard Problem of consciousness is still hard and religious belief does not make it any easier. We do not... – Can logic or evidence help you...
vividbleau TRuthfreedom “The “Recent Comments” section no longer links to the relevant posts, just to the blogs/ urls of the posters.... – Is the USA going over the...
Upright BiPed . By the way JVL, who or what is the source of the intelligence when you receive a semiotic signal... – The smog is beginning to clear...
Pearlman Dr. Siegel speculation a product of wishful thinking, from weak scientists and science, that is still trapped in their self-constructed... – From Ethan Siegel: What if the...
john_a_designer History informs us that Hitler and Nazis came into power democratically. A number of our interlocutors argue that moral obligations... – Were the Nazis on the Right...
Seversky Aarceng/2 in an interim report published on Wednesday (2019), the Commission of Investigation of the Mother and Baby Homes said... – Scientific American doubles down on all...
Seversky Mac McTavish/770 I agree, there is utter mad folly at the reins of government. President Trump, I went from VERY... – Is the USA going over the...
Querius KF, You're right on "party platforms." They represent only a potential agenda for politicians to advocate. I should have stuck... – Were the Nazis on the Right...
AaronS1978 @ Sev @ScAm https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=647204172599697&id=69813760388 Remember Scalia Yeah yeah bunch of hypocrites here’s some verbiage from Obama your precious precious Obama... – Scientific American doubles down on all...
News In fact, SciAm's foray into electoral politics is a watershed. They are no longer objective arbiters of fact. If they... – Scientific American doubles down on all...
ET JVL: Yes but I’m interested in why biology in general hasn’t accepted that that hasn’t shifted the unguided processes paradigm.... – The smog is beginning to clear...
ET JVL: I’m suggesting that you don’t know either, especially since you think ID is not about the how or when.... – The smog is beginning to clear...
JVL Polistra: 6+7=13, the opposite of 42. What do you mean 'the opposite of 42'? – The weirdness of the number 42
Upright BiPed . JVL, your last post is yet another attempt at deception. The issue before you does not turn on anyone... – The smog is beginning to clear...
kairosfocus TF, if evolutionary materialism were true, we would have no credible minds much less ones open to facts, reasoning, prudent... – Is the USA going over the...
kairosfocus F/N: On impeachment, in an interview with NYT Journalist, Speaker Pelosi goes on record: Swisher: All right, but I’m going... – Is the USA going over the...
Truthfreedom 27 Bob O'H Tf – rather, I know them well enough to have a good idea about what they are... – Why “statistical significance” is corrupting science
ET If "women's rights" means we get to slaughter the unborn at will then those rights need to be taken away.... – Scientific American doubles down on all...
ET LoL! @ Bob O'H- buy a dictionary and learn how to use it. Bob O'H doesn't know what the theory... – Why “statistical significance” is corrupting science
ET Just saying it doesn't make it so, Bob. But we understand that is all evos can do- make bald assertions. – The weirdness of the number 42