Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Butterfly “extinction” that wasn’t

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
Edith’s checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha)/Michael C. Singer, University of Plymouth

From ScienceDaily:

The evolution of wild species, adapting them to human management practices, can cause localised extinctions when those practices rapidly change. And in a new study published in Nature, Professors Michael C. Singer and Camille Parmesan have used more than 30 years of research to fully document an example of this process.

A large, isolated population of a North American butterfly evolved complete dependence on an introduced European weed to the point where the continued existence of the butterfly depended on the plant’s availability. The insects then became locally extinct when humans effectively eliminated that availability, confirming a prediction made by the same authors in a 1993 Nature paper.

Thus the advent of cattle ranching more than 100 years ago set an eco-evolutionary trap that the insects obligingly fell into, and the trap was sprung when humans suddenly removed the cattle, withdrawing their ‘gift’, and driving the butterflies to extinction.

As soon as the butterflies encountered the plantain, their caterpillars survived better on it than on their traditional host, Blue-Eyed Mary (Collinsia parviflora), causing the adults to evolve preference for laying eggs on the plantain. By the mid-2000s, they were 100% reliant on the plantain and the Collinsia had been abandoned.

However, within three years of the ranch’s cattle being removed due to financial pressures, the butterflies became locally extinct as the grasses around their favoured new host were no longer grazed, and the plantains became embedded in those grasses, cooling the micro-environment. The Collinsia was unaffected by removal of cattle, so if the butterflies had not evolved so rapidly in response to the introduction of the plantain, they would most likely have survived.

Around five years after the extinction, Edith’s checkerspots recolonized the meadow. Since they were all found feeding on Collinsia, the original host plant, scientists believe these colonists to be a new population, and that the lineage which had called the ranch home for several decades no longer exists. Paper. (paywall) – Michael C. Singer, Camille Parmesan. Lethal trap created by adaptive evolutionary response to an exotic resource. Nature, 2018; 557 (7704): 238 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0074-6 More.

“Extinction” is put in scare quotes above, though not in the ScienceDaily release, because this event is correctly termed an “extirpation” from a region. The extirpation did not stop checkerspots from other regions from moving into the area five years later. This sort of thing may well be common in nature. “Extinction” should properly mean dead and gone, like the trilobite and the tyrannosaur.

A question arises: Given that butterflies often hybridize, some extinctions may not mean quite what we think.

Also, a surprising number of life forms we believe to be extinct turn out not to be (lazarus species).

The study authors suggest that similar events may be happening in Europe. We’d best e clear about what those events are, exactly.

See also: Sixth mass extinction, but no news on defining “species”?

Extinction (or maybe not): New Scientist offers five “Lazarus species”

Lazarus species: animals listed as extinct that turned up again.

In a meadow in America a group of butterflies have been drawn into a lethal evolutionary trap. This trap, set by humans, was abruptly sprung when people left the area, leading to a local extinction. Nature Video uses painted hands to tell the story of the Edith’s checkerspot butterfly. More.

Comments
Bob O'H:
I’m not aware of anyone suggesting that that is what happened.
There isn't anything to indicate that it didn't happen.ET
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
09:46 AM
9
09
46
AM
PDT
"localised extinctions"
This is like "global warming"... lets play loose with the terms to perpetuate the narrative we like. Forget about precision in language. We need marketing, not science. Andrewasauber
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
09:37 AM
9
09
37
AM
PDT
Eastern cougar? Report sightings here. The bumf from the government at the page is a masterpiece of evasion but never mind. If you see a cougar in southern Ontario (where the vast majority of the human population lives), do let the government know. They have a relocation program that does not involve the fur trade. Cougars are famously elusive but occasionally one is captured, this one in Cobourg on Lake Ontario, in Toronto’s exurbs.News
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
09:21 AM
9
09
21
AM
PDT
Eric,
He quotes a dictionary definition that does not support his statement about a move from one area to another.
That wasn't my statement.
“Existing” is certainly not limited to occupying a particular geographical region.
Nobody said that it was. I was just saying that modern eciology more often uses the word "extinction" to describe the loss of a population (usually in a specific area) than to describe the loss of a species. For example, the eastern cougar is extinct. But Puma concolor, the species that the eastern cougar belonged to, still exists and is plentiful. But if you want to be precise, the correct term to use for situations like this is "extirpated".Allan Keith
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
08:58 AM
8
08
58
AM
PDT
AK @7: LOL! He quotes a dictionary definition that does not support his statement about a move from one area to another. "Existing" is certainly not limited to occupying a particular geographical region. Either something exists or it doesn't.Eric Anderson
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
08:36 AM
8
08
36
AM
PDT
ET - I'm not aware of anyone suggesting that that is what happened.Bob O'H
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
08:25 AM
8
08
25
AM
PDT
ET,
So if a population moves from one area to another they become “extinct” in that first area/? Really? Seems like a very poor choice of the word.
Take it up with the dictionary.
Extinction: a situation in which something no longer exists.
Allan Keith
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
08:25 AM
8
08
25
AM
PDT
So if a population moves from one area to another they become "extinct" in that first area/? Really? Seems like a very poor choice of the word.ET
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
07:57 AM
7
07
57
AM
PDT
PaV,
And Bob, I noticed you wrote “population,” and not “species.” Very telling.
How is this very telling? The word "extinction" is not limited to an entire species. In fact, when talking about modern ecosystems as opposed to the fossil record, the word extinction is used far more frequently to describe populations. For example, the eastern cougar is considered extinct.Allan Keith
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
07:46 AM
7
07
46
AM
PDT
PaV - this work is nothing to do with speciation, so I guess it is telling that I don't refer to species.Bob O'H
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
07:41 AM
7
07
41
AM
PDT
From Science Daily:
Around five years after the extinction, Edith's checkerspots recolonized the meadow. Since they were all found feeding on Collinsia, the original host plant, scientists believe these colonists to be a new population, and that the lineage which had called the ranch home for several decades no longer exists.
Are scientists supposed to "believe" or to "know"? They don't appear to know 'up' from 'down.' Supposition substitutes for science.PaV
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
07:36 AM
7
07
36
AM
PDT
If we're going to talk about butterflies, then mention should be made of Goldsmidt's "Material Basis of Evolution," in which he identifies a different soil as the cause of a supposed speciation event at the 'end' of an adaptive ring. Not a change in "allele frequency," but a change in soil type. And Bob, I noticed you wrote "population," and not "species." Very telling.PaV
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
07:30 AM
7
07
30
AM
PDT
“Extinction” should properly mean dead and gone, like the trilobite and the tyrannosaur.
And indeed the population that had become adapted to P. lanceolata had gone the way of the dodo.Bob O'H
May 17, 2018
May
05
May
17
17
2018
06:20 AM
6
06
20
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply