My latest ‘Critic’s Corner’ post is now up. This one features the work of ID critic Sahotra Sarkar. Sarkar is one of the more sophisticated critics of ID so his work is worth engaging with. I have responded to some of his arguments in a previous post and plan to do more in the future:
Critic’s Corner: Sahotra Sarkar
Joshua G,
You have quite an interesting collection of articles in your website. Thank you for sharing it.
This was posted in another thread, but maybe it fits in this one too.
BTW, ‘a’ stands for ‘ancestor’ and ‘d’ for ‘descendant’.
Dev(x) is the entire developmental process of a given biological system ‘x’. Delta(x,y) is the entire set of spatiotemporal changes required in Dev(x) in order to get Dev(y). All the bells and whistles have to be included. The whole enchilada. The point is to show how to get Delta(x,y) assuming that we know Dev(x) and Dev(y).
I challenge that professor and his cousins to show me one example that satisfies the above formulation.
We can sweep and mop the floor with all their baseless ideas.
With every new discovery their situation will get even worse.
Thanks Dionisio! More will be up shortly 🙂