Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Eric Holloway: Evolution and artificial intelligence face the same basic problem

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Eric Holloway looks at the discussions at the Wistar Institute—which fell down the memory hole in 1967—and recovers Marcel-Paul Schutzenberger (1920–1996)’s main point, that you can’t actually get there from here.

Think of the word ladder game, where we transform one word into another by changing only one letter at a time:

Schutzenberger offered the example of computer programs, which are extremely brittle and even more difficult than transforming English words. A single character out of place will render an entire computer program invalid and inoperable. His question is simple: What is it about DNA and evolution that makes the process so much more productive and robust than mutating computer programs or human languages? It is even more mysterious if this process makes the modifications “randomly,” in other words without any information regarding the environment nor what would benefit the organism. As we know, the debate rages today as to whether the way evolution is supposed to have happened is even possible.

Interestingly, the same question applies to artificial intelligence.

The language of the computer consists of ones and zeros, analogous to the four GATC* letters of DNA, transformed through various computational operations. This is the heart of artificial intelligence—operations on ones and zeros. These operations occur without any insight into the environment around them. Thus any information that enters the artificial intelligence can only be understood if it is anticipated by the artificial intelligence’s programming. So, Schutzenberger asked, if we have a mechanical process with no direct insight into its environment, how can it hope to learn from its environment anything beyond what has already been programmed into its source code?

During Schutzenberger’s time, some artificial intelligence researchers proposed that randomness could solve that problem…

Eric Holloway, “Evolution And Artificial Intelligence Face The Same Basic Problem” at Mind Matters News

Without knowledge about the goal and how to get there, it rapidly becomes first difficult and then completely impossible to reach the goal.

Comments
AaronS1978 - MM did an article here: https://mindmatters.ai/2020/09/can-ai-really-evolve-into-superintelligence-all-by-itself/johnnyb
September 24, 2020
September
09
Sep
24
24
2020
03:57 PM
3
03
57
PM
PDT
Hey did anyone see that article on science mag that ai is evolving itself Seems like a super big claim https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/artificial-intelligence-evolving-all-itselfAaronS1978
September 21, 2020
September
09
Sep
21
21
2020
02:53 PM
2
02
53
PM
PDT
No problem. Evolution and AI are fashionable, so they will continue to get all the money and power.polistra
September 21, 2020
September
09
Sep
21
21
2020
10:48 AM
10
10
48
AM
PDT
There is not such a thing as scientifically provable "random evolution". There is: - "we scientists can not know all variables involved in evolution and use as a working hypothesis the "random" one, because if we said "guided", people inmediately would infer an intelligence has to be involved and pope Lewontin says no no no way close the door. Truthfreedom
September 21, 2020
September
09
Sep
21
21
2020
09:07 AM
9
09
07
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply