For those of us who have been critiquing evolutionary theory for a long time, and hence, long-time observers of the kind of reasoning evolutionists/Darwinists employ, you can’t help but see the absolute parallel that exists between evolutionary theory and the “science” behind “global warming.” [N.B. If you have to change the name of the ‘science’ from “global warming” to “climate change,” then just admit you’ve lost the argument, else why change the very name you use?.]
Both involve ‘consensus’ thinking; both involve criteria that used in one manner provide a solution given ONE SET of facts, but which, given a new, different, and conflicting set of facts, are used in almost the opposite manner; both involve an almost faith-like allegiance to the theory.
So, in the midst of our current historically cold temperatures, articles appear telling us how historic cold is a by-product of ‘global warming.’
Below are two sentences that is equally valid if ‘evolutionary theory’ is substituted for ‘global warming’ and ‘evolutionary biologists’ for ‘climate scientists’:
Global warming is an infinitely flexible, unscientific, unfalsifiable theory which can be stretched to accommodate any observation. Some Climate Scientists even shamelessly reject the very concept of scientific falsification with regard to the conduct of climate science.
See here for the actual article.
When the time comes that Climate Change is seen to be the biggest scientific fraud in human history, will Darwinian evolution soon follow?