The problem with this headline is that it’s dated not 1859 but 2005:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=2&ObjectID=10361302
In what other science do its scientists have to do so much cheerleading for their theory?
The problem with this headline is that it’s dated not 1859 but 2005:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=2&ObjectID=10361302
In what other science do its scientists have to do so much cheerleading for their theory?