Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Here’s the film about Mike Behe

Denyse O'Leary
September 15, 2018
Evolution, Irreducible Complexity, Video
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Or here.

Note: Behe has a new book coming out. See New book from Michael Behe on how today’s DNA findings “devolve” Darwin

See also: The bombardier beetle, the toad, and – after all these years – Mike Behe

Comments
>> and I have a new book (called Darwin Devolves) coming our >> next February that shows the depths of the problem. That is good news, I look forward to Behe's new book.Granville Sewell
September 18, 2018
September
09
Sep
18
18
2018
05:58 AM
5
05
58
AM
PDT
Update: I got an email back from Prof. Behe. I assume he wouldn't object to me posting it here. Here it is: "Hi, Mr. [Collin], nice to meet you. I defend irreducible complexity whenever I see it attacked in an intellectually serious venue, such as academic journals or books. Often I post my writings at the websites of the Discovery Institute (a lot of good articles from an ID perspective can be found there). I haven't seen any such serious attacks in a long time (a number of frivolous ones, though). However, IC is a potent -- in fact, fatal -- problem for Darwinism, and I have a new book (called Darwin Devolves) coming our next February that shows the depths of the problem. Best wishes. mjb"Collin
September 17, 2018
September
09
Sep
17
17
2018
12:14 PM
12
12
14
PM
PDT
Irreducible complexity is pretty obvious. Try evolving Microsoft Office with a genetic algorithm.EricMH
September 17, 2018
September
09
Sep
17
17
2018
10:19 AM
10
10
19
AM
PDT
Irreducible Complexity is a fact and as such cannot be refuted. It can merely be ignored, or misrepresented.Mung
September 17, 2018
September
09
Sep
17
17
2018
10:15 AM
10
10
15
AM
PDT
I'm glad to see this because just today I was wondering if Behe was still actively doing research/publishing. I even sent him an email this morning prior to seeing this. I asked him if Irreducible Complexity is still actively defended. Can anyone tell me if it is defended or if it has been refuted effectively? thanks.Collin
September 17, 2018
September
09
Sep
17
17
2018
08:00 AM
8
08
00
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply