Darwinism Evolution

The Ma & Pa Kettle of Biology

Spread the love

Ever get frustrated arguing with Darwinists about the illogic of their theory? It’s like arguing with Ma & Pa Kettle about the finer points of arithmetic. I’m sure you’ll agree that the following video captures the dynamic of this debate (the only difference is that Ma & Pa Kettle are a lot more personable than most Darwinists): Ma & Pa Kettle doing math video.

8 Replies to “The Ma & Pa Kettle of Biology

  1. 1
    teleologist says:

    That would be hilarious if it did ring so true, except Ma & Pa Kettle were more logical.

  2. 2
    bFast says:

    Dr. Dembski, you are a mathemetician, correct? How could you possibly believe that 25 / 5 is anything other than 14. Certainly it is your religious bias that causes you to conclude that 25 / 5 = 5. Were there not five stones in David’s pouch when he faced Goliath? 25 / 5 = 14 is as established as gravity itself, ask any judge.

  3. 3
    Zero says:

    Looks like some of my math.

    Word equals God x God (pure math)

    Letting a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, etc, mathematically:

    God x God x God ……………………..= 47,900,160
    70 seven fold x 99 x love……………. = 47,900,160
    God x 1260 x love ……………………= 47,900,160
    10 % of heaven seven fold x God x G…….= 47,900,160
    10 % of 1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8x9x10x11x12……. = 47,900,160
    704 x 54 x 1260….….….…………………… = 47,900,160
    iron (9 x 18 x 15 x 14) x 1408 (2 x God)..= 47,900,160
    God x G x O x D x (God + God + God )…..= 47,900,160
    47,900,160 minus (Jesus squared x one)….= 47,160,900

    Jhn 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    Word (22,680) x 2112 (3xGod) ………. = 47,900,160

  4. 4
    lucID says:

    Bill you OBVIOUSLY don’t get it!!!

    The point is not whether or not 5×5= 25 but that through 14 small successive, random changes the 5 evolved in the 25. The fixity of mathematical principles are only as valid as they support the over-arching and unifying theory of Darwinism, which transcends ALL scientific fields (including psychology and Feng-shui). Religiously biased lunatic… ID’ists would have the world believe that mathematical probability and that stupid explanation filter thingy have some bearing on the argument. The point is it’s just not good science.! And I should know my aunt in the NCSE has got more back hair than Godzilla, now there’s real evolution for ya.

    Sheesh, I better garner ACLU support to have your degrees revoked.

  5. 5
    Larry Fafarman says:

    Considering how illogical Darwinism is, the agreement by most people that Darwinism should be taught alongside ID is actually a generous concession.

    In debating Darwinists, I get the impression that most of them are conceited and very disdainful of the opposition. They frequently call their opponents stupid and ignorant. Darwinists generally regard themselves as the best informed and most logical people in any discussion about the controversy. This disdain for the opposition extends to discussions of other subjects as well, like discussions about law. It seems that Darwinists can never make a rebuttal without putting someone down.

  6. 6
    DaveScot says:

    I just got around to watching it. Hilarious!

  7. 7
    tinabrewer says:

    Holy smokes thats funny…

  8. 8
    Farshad says:

    Take Ma & Pa’s way of doing math, mix it with some scientific jargon, cite a bunch of references (mostly from darwinist gurus) and you’ll get a wonderful Darwinian research paper.

Comments are closed.