Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

“The Scientific Case Against Darwinism Is Largely Won”

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Here’s a note from a senior biologist colleague (not Behe, not Minnich, not anybody widely known for his views on ID) regarding Darwinism:

It is important to make clear that there are two distinct parts of the issue, the scientific and the metaphysical. The scientific case against Darwinism is largely won. Evolutionary theory is constrained to a small part of biology. It is irrelevant to most of the life sciences. Most life science researchers know that. They constantly express surprise at new discoveries that were not expected based on evolutionary theory (e.g., the fugu genome or the bird-like mammal, the platypus, to name two for this week). They don’t use concepts in evolutionary biology in their research except in unusual cases. The metaphysical part is the worldview aspect, and that is what causes most of the pushback from Darwinists and the scientific establishment.

Comments
[...] they are the intellectual equivalent of spam. Update: I just read “DaveScot”s comment over at Dembski’s blog. He’s out of here. [...]stranger fruit » More Wells, Some Davison, Too Much “DaveScot” and a Little Spam
June 3, 2005
June
06
Jun
3
03
2005
07:32 PM
7
07
32
PM
PDT
John Lynch at Stranger Fruit has taken to removing the vowels from my comments on his blog. http://darwin.bc.asu.edu/blog/?p=351 What a wonderful demonstration of what Darwinian apologists do with things they don't want to hear. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. LOL - I might have to rethink the matter of whether man is descended from monkeys at least in John M. Lynch's case. DaveScot
June 3, 2005
June
06
Jun
3
03
2005
07:54 AM
7
07
54
AM
PDT
Oh dear. I've upset the peanut gallery.DaveScot
June 2, 2005
June
06
Jun
2
02
2005
10:56 AM
10
10
56
AM
PDT
Salvador, Thanks for finding me. You look like a group of excellent technical people I will join your discusssion. I am having problems posting on the web site. I will work it out. I got a nice note from Bill and he sent me more material. Thanks again Eric D. Schneider http://www.intothecool.com ericdschneider
May 26, 2005
May
05
May
26
26
2005
04:15 PM
4
04
15
PM
PDT
[...] covery that is not “expected based on evolutionary theory”. Meanwhile over at Dembski’s blog, the even articulate “DaveScot” [...]stranger fruit » More on the platypus
May 26, 2005
May
05
May
26
26
2005
08:55 AM
8
08
55
AM
PDT
Hi Eric D. Schneider, Since you addressed your post to Dr. Dembski and the others here, I thought I would extend my greetings to you. I congratulate you on your fine career as a scientist and your work with Dorion Sagan (Lynn Margulis son and co-author, I believe). The ISCID discussion board would be a good place to discuss those issues. Sources of entropy, such as the 2nd law will increase K-complexity in informatic structures that permit entropy to affect the sybolic content in a significant way. But from mathematical considerations alone, that would tend to erode "specified improbability" out of the system, especially structures that might be characterized as obeying rules of formal grammars. A Brainstorm on that issue and others is being explored at: http://www.iscid.org/boards/ubb-get_topic-f-6-t-000562.html Respected origin-of-life researchers, Harold Morowitz who teaches at my school testified on thermodynamics against the creationists in the landmark McLean vs. Arkansas, 1982. Ironically, he has an interesting perspective that is sympathetic to design (though he is not an IDist as far as I know). He ties mind, design, and thermodyanmics. I mention it in the opening post over there. Registering at ISCID may take a little doing, but we look forward to hearing from you. We do appreciate your contributions to the discussion. Salvador Cordova scordova
May 25, 2005
May
05
May
25
25
2005
10:06 PM
10
10
06
PM
PDT
On the platypus See how the platypus nose is totally different than the duck nose? Sure, with the skin on, they're pretty similar, but underneath, they're totally different. This is why I sincerely doubt that Dembski's friend is actually much of a biologist. How co...Thoughts from Kansas
May 25, 2005
May
05
May
25
25
2005
06:26 PM
6
06
26
PM
PDT
Dr William Bill Dembski, and members of the Dembski BLOG I have read several of your books and followed your blog for months. Wow what energy you people have!! To introduce myself I am an interdisciplinary scientist with a thirty-year research program which has been a synthesis of physics and biology at a most fundamental level. Specifically I study the intersection of energy flow, thermodynamics with life. My PhD was in geology (I was a classmate with Stephen Gould in Graduate School) but in the 40 years since then I have had high positions in the scientific agencies in Washington, directed A National laboratory for the Environmental Protection Agency, taught at several universities and all the while working on theoretical issues. Over the past decade while living in the Montana much of that work has come together with a recent book, Into The Cool, which I co-wrote with Dorion Sagan. This book about thermodynamics and life shows how the obscure science of thermodynamics is behind much of the complexity we see in nature; important to the manifestation of life whether it be its origin, it’s evolution or it’s contribution to the human experience. The publication of our book Into the Cool has galvanized some of the Intelligent Design movement who believe that thermodynamics proves a vital theoretical blow to the scientific facts of evolution. The interest in this material seems immense. A Goggle search has 705,000 hits on the phrase “thermodynamics and life” and 569,000 hits for the phrase “evolution and thermodynamics” Bill, As the intellectual leader of the ID movement, do you see a problem with thermodynamics and present evolutionary theory? If so could you give me some references? I am looking forward to your reply and working with you. We do have a website that provides a detailed description of our to soon-to-be released (June 2) book Into the Cool: Energy Flow, Thermodynamics, and Life (University of Chicago Press 2005). This is not an advertisement for our book, as much of the important issues in our book are on the web page for free. About 8 percent of the book’s text and 35 percent of the figures are on the web page so that the main themes of the book are available online. Read more about complexity, thermodynamics, and life. Come and pitch in. www.intothecool.com and http://www.intothecool.com/blog/ I plan to be availible to the group on issues dealing with thermodynamics and evolution. Eric D. Schneider ericdschneider
May 25, 2005
May
05
May
25
25
2005
08:17 AM
8
08
17
AM
PDT
What a bunch of stupid disseminating from the Darwinian narrative apologist at Stranger Fruit. A beak, webbed feet, lays eggs, and has "duck" in the common name. The best the dummy at Stranger fruit can do is make a lame issue over calling it "bird-like"? HAHAHAHA - thanks for confirming that the scientific case against Darwinism IS largely won. DaveScot
May 25, 2005
May
05
May
25
25
2005
06:14 AM
6
06
14
AM
PDT
Worldview of Darwinism A quote from the blog Uncommon Descent strengthens what I said in my previous post, namely, that the impetus of the attacks against ID does not come from scientific objections but largely from the worldview of the scientists who are objecting....The Donkey's Mouth
May 25, 2005
May
05
May
25
25
2005
03:21 AM
3
03
21
AM
PDT
A fun game We did this once before, but Billy Dembski got snookered, so we'll try it again. One of these is a bird, the other is one of the following: a bird a mammal a "bird-like mammal" A patented TfK/TEP pat on the back to anyone who correctly identi...Thoughts from Kansas
May 24, 2005
May
05
May
24
24
2005
10:51 AM
10
10
51
AM
PDT
On Platypus, Duck and Water-Rat Over at Demsski's blog he cites an (un-named) "senior biologist": It is important to make clear that there are two distinct parts of the issue, the scientific and the metaphysical. The scientific case against Darwinism is largely won. Evolutionary t...stranger fruit
May 24, 2005
May
05
May
24
24
2005
09:50 AM
9
09
50
AM
PDT
Which biologist states this? Benjii
May 24, 2005
May
05
May
24
24
2005
08:50 AM
8
08
50
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply