Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

DNA has a molecular ambulance

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

From BioTechniques:

A molecular motor that transports damaged DNA is also necessary for its repair.

Double-strand breaks in DNA are a source of stress and sometimes death for cells. But the breaks can be fixed if they find their way to repair sites within the cell. In yeast, one of the main repair sites resides on the nuclear envelope where a set of proteins, including nuclear pore subcomplex Nup84, serves as a molecular hospital of sorts. The kinesin-14 motor protein complex, a “DNA ambulance,” moves the breaks to repair sites, according to a new study in Nature Communications (1).

“To think of motor proteins moving DNA inside cells-it was very surprising,” said corresponding author Karim Mekhail at the University of Toronto. “In the beginning, we thought that there must be some other way to explain these findings. But the more we tested, the more we realized that kinesin-14 must be mediating the movement of damaged DNA.” More.

Just a random event, for sure. Like that plague of Boltzmann brains floating over your desks… Oh wait, you better not think this one out too clearly.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
Carpathian, Your opinion means nothing. Alicia is full of bluff and bluster.Virgil Cain
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
09:46 AM
9
09
46
AM
PDT
Virgil Cain:
Alicia seems to be nothing more than a bloviating arse. She doesn’t have any answers and her attempt at ridicule proves she is a bully-wannabe. How typical and still pathetic.
She obviously knows more about biology than you or most IDists do. The fact that you cannot see this is evidence that the biological ID movement isn't ready to provide any answers about biology.Carpathian
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
09:37 AM
9
09
37
AM
PDT
@50- "Is anyone else (genuinely) surprised the REC doesn’t know how the relationships between codons and amino acids are established in the extant translation system?" I'm (genuinely) surprised at the crap tone ID supporters take. With the death of ID, I guess this is the inevitable shift from denial to anger. Next comes bargaining. But what is wrong with the statement: a codon "physically codes(hence the name) for an amino acid, as translated by the adapter molecule tRNA through hydrogen bonds and physical fit?" I could go into detail about aaRS, but again, we're talking about biochemical forces connecting the codon to the amino acid. Cue "direct" "representation" "arbitrary" etc., and so on. None of this makes you of Joe right when you say that there is no physical relationship. You failed to answer the question: "I propose a test. Lets re-arrange a Trp codon. Does the amino acid incorporated change?"REC
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
09:33 AM
9
09
33
AM
PDT
I'm not surprised. Interesting how design works on so many levels. It's fascinating really.ppolish
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
09:27 AM
9
09
27
AM
PDT
Is anyone else (genuinely) surprised the REC doesn't know how the relationships between codons and amino acids are established in the extant translation system?Upright BiPed
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
09:22 AM
9
09
22
AM
PDT
"a codon and the amino acid it represents" A codon doesn't "represent" anything, except in human made protein translation tables or programs. It physically codes(hence the name) for an amino acid, as translated by the adapter molecule tRNA through hydrogen bonds and physical fit. "arrangment of a codon does not establish the relationship between a codon and an amino acid. " I propose a test. Lets re-arrange the codon. Does the amino acid incorporated change? I'm not going to launch into a language critique here, but it is interesting when a well defined physical process gets murkier by the use of "relationship" and "representation"REC
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
09:10 AM
9
09
10
AM
PDT
#44 No, we don't agree. The arrangment of a codon does not establish the relationship between a codon and an amino acid. That's not how translation works in the real world.Upright BiPed
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
08:55 AM
8
08
55
AM
PDT
Alicia, Intelligent Design would include cells having foresight and the ability to move molecules around as it seems fit to do.Virgil Cain
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
08:54 AM
8
08
54
AM
PDT
REC:
“Determine relationships” is, perhaps to you, a more interesting phrase than to me, but don’t we all agree ribonucleotide base pairing (hydrogen bonds and size) is responsible for the relationship between a nucleic acids codon and the specific amino acid to be incorporated into protein?
There isn't any physio-chemical relationship between a codon and the amino acid it represents. The relationship is arbitrary and because of that it is evidence for coding agent.Virgil Cain
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
08:52 AM
8
08
52
AM
PDT
Alicia:
My system carries out the same representational function as the actual system in living organisms today.
The rate that amino acids are bonded influences the final form. Also you have to account for your system.Virgil Cain
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
08:49 AM
8
08
49
AM
PDT
@43: "Nucleotides don’t determine relationships within extant cells." "Determine relationships" is, perhaps to you, a more interesting phrase than to me, but don't we all agree ribonucleotide base pairing (hydrogen bonds and size) is responsible for the relationship between a nucleic acids codon and the specific amino acid to be incorporated into protein?REC
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
08:32 AM
8
08
32
AM
PDT
Nucleotides don’t determine relationships within extant cells. That’s not how translation works in the real world.Upright BiPed
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
08:24 AM
8
08
24
AM
PDT
My system carries out the same representational function as the actual system in living organisms today. It just does so in a simpler manner. Certain nucleotides favoring the binding of certain amino acids within the polymerizing ribozyme is the driving force behind the evolution of the system I proposed, to the system we see today. I am assuming the necessary amino acids and nucleotides are already present, but they do not necessarily need to be the same amino acids and nucleotides in use today.Alicia Cartelli
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
07:55 AM
7
07
55
AM
PDT
Always a good chat with you, Upright.
I didn’t think anything else needed to be said. It’s obvious from your response that you not only have no coherent answers, but you don’t even comprehend the question – otherwise you wouldn’t imagine a system that accomplishes its task any differently that the actual system in place.Upright BiPed
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
07:40 AM
7
07
40
AM
PDT
It's obvious that Alicia has no idea what she is talking about- all bluff and bluster. People like Alicia give science a bad name.Virgil Cain
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
07:00 AM
7
07
00
AM
PDT
PPolish, I’d rather spend time researching and finding better cures for cancer. Always a good chat with you, Upright. Eugene, that was an awesome game of telephone you played with yourself there. “Foresight” is knowing what will be needed in the future. Molecules do not have foresight. They are present in the cell or they’re not, and they carry out a specific function when the necessary pieces are in place. Also, the term “recognize” in biology doesn’t mean what most people think when they hear the word. When a molecule “recognizes” another, it simply means it happened to crash into it when floating around the cell and the binding sites met in the correct orientation. Sorry, but you guy really have no idea what you are talking about. Thanks for the laughs though.Alicia Cartelli
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
06:43 AM
6
06
43
AM
PDT
Alicia, I am sure you know that every function in biology has a key word that describes it. I am sure you know that this word is 'recognize'.EugeneS
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
05:18 AM
5
05
18
AM
PDT
Alicia seems to be nothing more than a bloviating arse. She doesn't have any answers and her attempt at ridicule proves she is a bully-wannabe. How typical and still pathetic.Virgil Cain
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
05:03 AM
5
05
03
AM
PDT
UB, You have mail. :)EugeneS
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
04:59 AM
4
04
59
AM
PDT
ayearningforpublius @32 Thanks.Dionisio
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
03:32 AM
3
03
32
AM
PDT
Upright BiPed @33 Since you seem to understand what she wrote, can you explain it to me? Thanks. I definitely didn't get it. But again I belong in the special kind of stupid group. :)Dionisio
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
03:31 AM
3
03
31
AM
PDT
Oh I see So, your thinking of a ribozyme. And it's gonna have some nucleotides. And some amino acids. powerful.Upright BiPed
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
03:01 AM
3
03
01
AM
PDT
Dionisio @29: Thanks ... I've polished it up a bit at ayearningforpublius.wordpress.com/2015/09/03/either-modern-evolutionary-biology-is-goal-directed-or-it-is-falseayearningforpublius
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
02:57 AM
2
02
57
AM
PDT
"All elements of life do not demonstrate “goal direction,” they have a function(s) and they carry out these function(s). End of story." Function is by definition teleologic. Function is something useful, and has by its own nature, a purpose. Function is about "in order to". And "in order to" is a synonym of foresight. End of story. Comments 5 and 11 are nice.EugeneS
September 4, 2015
September
09
Sep
4
04
2015
02:31 AM
2
02
31
AM
PDT
Alicia Cartelli @16
Let’s take Dio here, he’s been posting abstracts to the same webpage on UD for who knows how long, and yet he still knows next to nothing about biology.
Thank you for giving me undeserved credits, but let me correct something you wrote about me:
next to nothing
should read more accurately:
next to nothing
I'm morally and intellectually destitute. But I don't want any exaltation or credits from this dying world. My identity is in Christ, Who made you and me. His grace is sufficient. Don't need anything else. I'll pray for you.Dionisio
September 3, 2015
September
09
Sep
3
03
2015
11:04 PM
11
11
04
PM
PDT
ayearningforpublius @11 Very insightful commentary. Thank you.Dionisio
September 3, 2015
September
09
Sep
3
03
2015
10:23 PM
10
10
23
PM
PDT
Alicia, google "smiling cancer kids" and check out the "images". Say a prayer for them - it can't hurt can it? It can't.ppolish
September 3, 2015
September
09
Sep
3
03
2015
09:10 PM
9
09
10
PM
PDT
Keep your shirt on upright, I don’t have the time to be constantly checking UD for your oh-so insightful posts. Anyways, I’ve seen your “translational system” schtick on here often as well so I’ll keep it short. I’m envisioning some kind of ribozyme that is capable of polymerizing amino acids specifically based on both the chemical properties of the nucleotides within the ribozyme as well as the chemical properties of the amino acids themselves. I’m not saying the system is as complex as what we see in living organisms today, but it is “representational organization.” Ppolish, are you high? Next time you see someone with cancer, or some congenital defect, pick any disease really; make sure to let them know that “laughter is the best medicine.” I’m sure they’ll really appreciate it.Alicia Cartelli
September 3, 2015
September
09
Sep
3
03
2015
08:42 PM
8
08
42
PM
PDT
Oh well. Maybe some other time then.Upright BiPed
September 3, 2015
September
09
Sep
3
03
2015
07:55 PM
7
07
55
PM
PDT
Alicia Thanks, that tells me all I needed to know about you.scottH
September 3, 2015
September
09
Sep
3
03
2015
07:42 PM
7
07
42
PM
PDT
1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply