Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Przewalski’s horse species older than thought?

arroba Email
File:Przewalski's Horse at The Wilds.jpg
/Jeff Kubina

From “Endangered horse has ancient origins and high genetic diversity, new study finds”(Eurekalert, September 7, 2011)., we

An endangered species of horse — known as Przewalski’s horse — is much more distantly related to the domestic horse than researchers had previously hypothesized, reports a team of investigators led by Kateryna Makova, a Penn State University associate professor of biology.

The scientists tested the portion of the genome passed exclusively from mother to offspring — the mitochondrial DNA — of four Przewalski’s horse lineages and compared the data to DNA from the domestic horse (Equus caballus). They concluded that, although previous scientists had assumed that Przewalski’s horse and the domestic horse had diverged around the time that horses were domesticated — about 6,000 to 10,000 years ago — the real time of the two species’ divergence from one another is much more ancient.

The data gleaned from the study also suggest that present-day Przewalski’s horses have a much more diverse gene pool than previously hypothesized.

It’s interesting how often genomes are full of surprises.

Makova added that, although the two species diverged well over 100,000 years ago, they have interbred periodically since then. “Also fortunate is the fact that conservationists in the second half of the 20th century realized how grave the situation was for the Przewalski’s horse. They not only began new breeding efforts and built wildlife reserves in California and the Ukraine, but they also made sure to avoid inbreeding among close relatives,” Makova said. “For this reason, the present-day population has managed to remain healthy by retaining substantial genetic diversity.”

So it’s not clear to what extent Przewalski’s horse really is a separate species. But if people thought so, they were more likely to take action to preserve it, and we can be glad for that. Follow UD News at Twitter!

Or maybe their clock, and the assumptions behind it, are wrong, thereby making most points conerning said discussions of "when" moot. arkady967
OT Ms. O'Leary: Human Evolution episode #4762. Missing Link (transitional fossil) found yet again;
'Game-changer' in evolution from S. African bones Excerpt: So, does all this mean A. sediba was the "missing link"? Well, scientists don't like that term, which Berger calls "biologically unsound.",, ,,, Scientists prefer the terms "transition form" or "intermediary form," said Darryl J. DeRuiter of Texas A&M University. http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-game-changer-evolution-african-bones.html
But if, as they contend, they finally found the missing 'transitional form', between apes and man, does this mean that they are admitting that the other 'transitional forms' claimed to be as such were not actually the 'transitional forms' that Darwinists resolutely touted them to be in the first place???
Is the early history of the human race such a mess that it shouldn’t be taught in school? https://uncommondesc.wpengine.com/human-evolution/is-the-early-history-of-the-human-race-such-a-mess-that-it-shouldnt-be-taught-in-school/ Icon Of Evolution – Ape To Man – The Ultimate Deception – video http://www.vimeo.com/19080087

Leave a Reply