Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Belief?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Mark Frank: “Evolution does not select for specific beliefs.”

Of course not Mark, if by “evolution” you mean materialist Neo-Darwinian evolution. This is the case for the simple reason that if materialism is true, “beliefs” as they are commonly understood do not exist. They are an illusion, mere “folk psychology” according to Dennett.

Comments
Keith S Beliefs are first and foremost a mental state, not a brain state and here is why, we can freely choose to change our beliefs anytime we want, matter or chemical reactions does not work that way. Mere matter can't change its mind..... get it?Andre
March 12, 2015
March
03
Mar
12
12
2015
10:12 PM
10
10
12
PM
PDT
Andre, How do you know that beliefs are non-physical?keith s
March 12, 2015
March
03
Mar
12
12
2015
10:03 PM
10
10
03
PM
PDT
Keith S
Also, what is the essential property of a belief that cannot be captured by materialism
Beliefs are intentional states, they do not consist of any matter.... so the average materialist tries to confirm his denial with that which he denies in the first place...... You can figure out what that means, but knowing already that the average atheists have faulty logic (intentional) you probably won't.Andre
March 12, 2015
March
03
Mar
12
12
2015
10:01 PM
10
10
01
PM
PDT
These guys are just too precious, we can't trust our senses, but not to worry materialism is true...... they just know it! They tell us everyday that you can't really know....... Well how do you know that you can't know? How do you know that you can't trust your senses? How do you know God does not exist? How do you know materialism is true? What do you ground this on?Andre
March 12, 2015
March
03
Mar
12
12
2015
09:56 PM
9
09
56
PM
PDT
Barry,
They [beliefs] are an illusion, mere “folk psychology” according to Dennett.
Do you have a quote? Dennett is an eliminativist about qualia, but not, as far as I know, about beliefs. Also, what is the essential property of a belief that cannot be captured by materialism, in your opinion? Lastly, don't forget to respond to my comment on the Fred thread:
Barry, I’ve shown that Pearcey’s argument – if it were correct – would undermine an ID-based epistemology just as surely as it would undermine an evolutionary epistemology. If you have a viable counterargument, let’s hear it.
keith s
March 12, 2015
March
03
Mar
12
12
2015
09:53 PM
9
09
53
PM
PDT
1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply