Betül Kaçar, director of NASA Astrobiology Consortium, asks if we should just seed exoplanets with life, provided certain cautions are observed:
There are a lot of reasons to think very carefully about doing something like that, as Betül Kaçar (pictured), director of the NASA Astrobiology Consortium MUSE, acknowledges: “Rather than regarding the overwhelming majority of planets and moons as failures unworthy of further study, we should instead recognise them for what they are: they’re not empty. In fact, a very high number of them might have been (and might yet be still) on the cusp of flourishing with life, if provided the specific potential to do so. What if a significant percentage of those planets and moons require only a few hundred kilogrammes of ‘the right chemical stuff’ to spark their own, unique biotic revolutions? – Betül Kaçar, “Do We Send the Goo?” at Aeon”News, “Why search for extraterrestrial life? Why not make it ourselves?” at Mind Matters News
There is, of course, the little problem that we have no idea how life actually got started here, let alone how to make it. But her observations are interesting nonetheless. Maybe the only ETs that ever exist will be the ones we invent, fictional or otherwise.
You may also enjoy:
Particle physicist offers 75 reasons we don’t see aliens. But Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute gives high odds that we are the only intelligent beings in the galaxy. No matter whose theory about why we don’t see extraterrestrials is right, we are bound to go on wondering and searching.
Can we find purpose in a universe with no underlying purpose? That’s the ambitious goal of a prominent science writer. Philip Ball, author of How to Grow a Human, tries to generate purpose from nothing but leaves many unanswered questions.