Both these science journal contributions are hidden behind paywalls:
Feature frequency profile-based phylogenies are inaccurate
Reply to Li et al.: Organism tree of life: Gene phylogeny vs. whole-proteome phylogeny.
It’s unclear why naturalist atheists think that all life must have arisen from a single cell. Could one be a naturalist atheist but still allow for multiple origins of life? So many of the explosions around the alleged Tree of Life seem to point back to a narrow view of that particular matter. Some of us would be interested to know why the narrow view is supposed to be so critical. Assuming it’s even discussable, of course.
Also: Why are so many interesting discussions paywalled? Isn’t the public paying for most of this stuff?