Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Bargaining With a Machine

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

In the film The Matrix, the character known as Cypher or “Mr. Reagan,” has grown weary of the endless war with the machines and his dreary living conditions.  In this scene we see Cypher contemplating a deal with Agent Smith.  In return for betraying his comrades, the Agents will return him to the Matrix as a rich and famous person (within that imaginary construct) with no recollection of the true nature of the world:

Here is the dialoge from the scence:

Smith:  Do we have a deal, Mr. Reagan?

Reagan:  You know, I know this steak doesn’t exist.  I know that when I put it in my mouth the Matrix is telling my brain that it is juicy and delicious.  After nine years, you know what I realize? [puts piece of steak in his mouth and sighs contentedly as he chews] ignorance is bliss.

Smith:  Then we have a deal.

Reagan:  I don’t want to remember nothing.  Nothing.  Do you understand?

Smith nods.

Reagan:  And I want to be rich, umm, someone important, like an actor.

Smith:  Whatever you want Mr. Reagan.

If you are like me, when you saw this scene you thought, “what an idiot.”  In order for Cypher to receive the benefit of his bargain, the computer program that controls the Matrix must follow though on its side of the deal.  The problem is obvious.  Computer programs are amoral.  They recognize no moral imperative to keep promises.  For the computer program, whether to keep its bargain with Cypher is purely a matter of calculation.  Does keeping the bargain further its interests?  If so, it will keep it.  If not, it will disregard it without a thought (so to speak).  And one can easily imagine that after Cypher has delivered his part of the bargain, the program will kill him or, even if it does return him to the Matrix, put him in a virtual prison instead of giving him a life of fame and ease.

The materialists say our brains are nothing but biological computers — not different in essence from the computer on which the Matrix runs.  If that is true, when I make a bargain with a materialist – if the materialist acts on the premises of his metaphysics – I will be in exactly the same position that Cypher was in when he bargained with Agent Smith.  After I deliver my side of the bargain, the materialist will deliver his side only if he believes it continues to be in his interest.  Moral considerations about keeping promises will be utterly irrelevant.

Fortunately, no sane person actually lives their day-to-day life as if materialism were true

Comments
Sev,
Christians, for example . . .
OK readers. You have to make a bargain and your very life depends on the other party keeping his promise. You can choose between bargaining with a materialist or a Christian. Do you choose the person who believes there is an objective moral code binding him to keep his word and who believes he will be rewarded in heaven for living a good life, which includes keeping his promises? Or do you choose the party who believes his promise is utterly meaningless (along with everything else) and that his brain is nothing but a meat computer?Barry Arrington
February 13, 2018
February
02
Feb
13
13
2018
08:53 PM
8
08
53
PM
PDT
Seversky @3
Christians, for example, live the life they believe their God requires of them on the promise of eventual eternal life in heaven, reunited with all their loved ones and friends. But they can never be sure that God will keep His part of the bargain. After all, no one has ever come back and been able to verify that the bargain is being kept, which is just a wee bit suspicious in itself.
Do you trust anyone? Surely there is someone you trust. You trust them because you know them. You have to admit that there is at least a possibility that the person you trust might betray you, right? But you don't worry about it because you really know that person. Well multiply that trust you have in that person times, say, a million, and you might begin to understand how Christians trust Jesus. They trust Him because they know Him:
He who has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me; and he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest myself to him. - John 14:21
He does manifest Himself to those who love Him, so they know Him. And those who know Jesus can't help but trust Him; they are absolutely "sure that God will keep His part of the bargain."harry
February 13, 2018
February
02
Feb
13
13
2018
08:44 PM
8
08
44
PM
PDT
The problem is obvious. Computer programs are amoral. They recognize no moral imperative to keep promises. Why do physical bodies such as Earth and Sun keep their bargain to produce gravitational forces on each other of precise value we labeled as 'law of gravity'? Why doesn't Sun suddenly suck in the Earth, forget the law, to feed its fusion process for longer? The more "simple" (in human perspective) a system is, the more harmonized it is with the rest of the universe, the harder it sticks to its "promises" to follow the mathematically simple and precise laws. It is none other than "moral" humans that the most shifty with their promises. The top post is an excellent illustration of focusing on the speck in your neighbor's eye, being blinded by the beam in your own eye.nightlight
February 13, 2018
February
02
Feb
13
13
2018
07:48 PM
7
07
48
PM
PDT
Given the slop they were being fed on their underground hovercraft, I can well understand how Cypher was tempted by that juicy steak and the promise of the good life. And it's true that he has no guarantee that the Matrix or its agents will keep their word but that's true of most bargains. Christians, for example, live the life they believe their God requires of them on the promise of eventual eternal life in heaven, reunited with all their loved ones and friends. But they can never be sure that God will keep His part of the bargain. After all, no one has ever come back and been able to verify that the bargain is being kept, which is just a wee bit suspicious in itself. Perhaps the Matrix and God have reasons of their own which they are keeping to themselves. Anyone remember the science-fiction short story "To Serve Man"?Seversky
February 13, 2018
February
02
Feb
13
13
2018
07:43 PM
7
07
43
PM
PDT
mahuna,
The same is true for any deal cut with a human
Only if materialism is true mahuna. Assume your conclusion much?Barry Arrington
February 13, 2018
February
02
Feb
13
13
2018
06:19 PM
6
06
19
PM
PDT
The same is true for any deal cut with a human: you ASSUME the other person is Honorable and will follow through on his end of the deal. The machine has no sense of Honor, but then neither does a Mexican drug dealer. Neither is expecting repeat business. I simply shoot you and take both the briefcase full of money AND the footlocker full of drugs. Any number of deals in politics or diplomacy or spying has very little downside to, um, "welshing" on the deal. (I'm not sure why the Welsh got tagged with this style of bargaining.) And yet politicians and diplomats and spies are sane, even if they are without honor. And if you cheat your opponent on a BIG deal, your name will be listed amongst the Heroes for generations to come. And consider all the sudden outrage about famous and influential men forcing sex on women seeking the men's fame and influence. This was one of those strange "open secrets". It was a thing you had heard was necessary as part of making a deal. Or in the case of Bill Clinton campaign workers, it was something you HADN'T heard was part of the deal, and then NO ONE want to hear about your personal problems. He is important. You're insignificant. So the question for a person seeking to cut a deal is: is the downside of a bad deal as bad for the other guy as it is for me? If it's not as bad for me, the upside of cheating on this deal is probably greater than the long term effect on my credibility.mahuna
February 13, 2018
February
02
Feb
13
13
2018
04:04 PM
4
04
04
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply