Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Can you believe it? The COVID crazy is destroying trust in science experts

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Here, we are all falling over in shock:

The trials and tribulations of COVID-19 in America have dealt an irreparable blow to the credibility of America’s ruling class and the ruling class’s implicit appeal to its authority as a coterie of highly trained and capable experts. No single person exemplifies this more than Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has attained celebrity status during the pandemic as the nation’s leading immunologist and forward-facing spokesman for our public policy response. As Steve Deace and Todd Erzen detail in their new book, Faucian Bargain: The Most Powerful and Dangerous Bureaucrat in American History, Fauci has repeatedly contradicted himself throughout the pandemic, waffling on what the “science” demands at any given moment while still always seeming to err on the side of draconian overreaction.

Recent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by BuzzFeed and the Washington Post only underscore the point. Perhaps most damningly, the FOIA requests revealed a February 2020 email to former Obama-era Secretary of Health and Human Services Sylvia Burwell explaining that store-bought face masks are “really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection.” He also added that the “typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material.”

Of course, barely over a month after Fauci’s unearthed email to Burwell, Americans were required to wear masks pretty much every time they left their house—and mask-skeptical posts were censored or deleted by the ruling class’s preferred private-sector enforcement arm, Big Tech.

Josh Hammer, “COVID-19 Has Forever Destroyed Americans’ Trust in ‘Experts’” at American Greatness (June 3, 2021)

Learned:

  1. Many bureaucrats relished enforcing rules that made no sense whatever. Dying aged people couldn’t see their young relatives. Bars were open but churches were closed. Some places had curfews; others did not. In some places, schools were closed; in others, they were not.
  2. The main effect of Big Tech censorship was to make discussing the problems difficult.
  3. Far more of our fellow citizens than many of us would have thought possible simply accepted the crazy, then cowered, and hid. For no reason other than rank, irrational fear.
  4. Among more thoughtful people, the term “science” has taken one heck of a beating. When this is all over, we hope it still means something other than “whatever bureaucrats enforce.”
Comments
Soooooooooo gonna leave this right here Hydroxychloroquine proved it was actually worth something SCIENCE! https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.28.21258012v1AaronS1978
June 10, 2021
June
06
Jun
10
10
2021
05:41 PM
5
05
41
PM
PDT
Sev, the concern is valid, Scientism as handmaiden of lawless, dominant oligarchy, is discrediting Science. Censorship, Red Guardism, dirty McFaul colour revolution coups, word magic newspeak feeding agit prop and lawfare leading to lawless domination and more are going to have serious consequences, locally and geostrategically as esp both ends of Asia go seriously active. KFkairosfocus
June 9, 2021
June
06
Jun
9
09
2021
09:52 PM
9
09
52
PM
PDT
Asauber/6
FYI, Trump is no longer president of the USA. You livin’ in the past.
Tell that to him, not me. He's the one who still thinks he's President. It's not me living in the past.Seversky
June 9, 2021
June
06
Jun
9
09
2021
09:04 PM
9
09
04
PM
PDT
The rot in the scientific community, at universities is a real thing. These are not a few rotten apples, but general rot in the culture that is widely adopted. It is about people having a bad personal judgement. Fact obsessed people, who are clueless about subjective issues. Clueless about how to prime their emotions for honesty. People who conceive of what is good and bad, social justice, as being a matter of scientific fact. People who are constantly emotionally feeding on the feelings of certitude, associated to facts, and have no real emotional base. Then they come into a moral panic, when someone disagrees with them, when someone challenges their soft psychosis based on their feelings of certitude.mohammadnursyamsu
June 8, 2021
June
06
Jun
8
08
2021
06:32 AM
6
06
32
AM
PDT
"Big Liars like Trump and the Trumpicans." Sev, FYI, Trump is no longer president of the USA. You livin' in the past. Andrewasauber
June 8, 2021
June
06
Jun
8
08
2021
05:19 AM
5
05
19
AM
PDT
A lie told enough times becomes the truth to enough people who care nothing about doing their own research.BobRyan
June 8, 2021
June
06
Jun
8
08
2021
12:23 AM
12
12
23
AM
PDT
"What does one need to push a Big Lie?" That's obvious. Big Liars like Trump and the Trumpicans.Seversky
June 7, 2021
June
06
Jun
7
07
2021
07:46 PM
7
07
46
PM
PDT
What does one need to push a Big Lie? Extensive and prolonged exposure? Perception of Authority? Serious subject? Did Fraudchi have those things? Andrewasauber
June 7, 2021
June
06
Jun
7
07
2021
11:45 AM
11
11
45
AM
PDT
From Scott Adams
The next time you see a letter signed by lots of scientists, your default assumption should be that they are pushing a lie for political reasons, or for profit, or to cover their rears. Someday the scientific community might earn back our trust. That won't be this year.
jerry
June 7, 2021
June
06
Jun
7
07
2021
10:39 AM
10
10
39
AM
PDT
From the start of this shit, the scariest part is that nobody even WANTS to be trusted. None of the "freedom-defending" politicians stood up, none of the "skeptical" scientists stood up. Everyone was bribed and blackmailed into collaboration. When criminals don't care that the witnesses have seen the crime, it means they intend to kill all the witnesses.polistra
June 7, 2021
June
06
Jun
7
07
2021
09:11 AM
9
09
11
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply