Culture Darwinism Intelligent Design

Darwinian biologist worries that the Guardian now touts astrology

Spread the love

Jerry Coyne worries about one of the many outcomes of the COVID-19 crazy:

It’s bad enough that venues like NBC News and the New York Times publish news—without caveats—stating that Jesus was not only a real person, but did the deeds and said the words described in Scripture. Now The Guardian has published a longish piece in which five astrologers predict what will happen after the pandemic begins to abate. Not only that, but they add no caveats about astrology being bogus, and in fact make statements that there might be something to it. Is this the kind of “post-truth” journalism that we can expect now?

Jerry Coyne, “The Guardian touts astrology” at Why Evolution Is True

Couple of things. First: For many decades, newspapers have published astrology columns, making no issue one way or the other about astrology because, well, why? Is the City Desk Editor supposed be a judge of what happens in the heavens?

Second, we keep coming back to this: The internet killed traditional media. You don’t need them to find out the snow warning any more or who won last night’s game. They now exist only as courtiers for powerful interests. So who cares if they publish astrology if it does no obvious harm.

Third, Darwinism is pretty much as silly as astrology but it basks in the golden glow of “science.” It must be true if it is endorsed by science institutions and all that. Okay, whatever.

Hold the censorship. You don’t know what you think you know.

2 Replies to “Darwinian biologist worries that the Guardian now touts astrology

  1. 1
    polistra says:

    We’d be better off if we regarded ALL science in the same light as astrology. Just a form of entertainment. This is certainly true for all “science” that makes it into the news. The only honest science (materials and engineering) tends to happen in industrial research labs where it remains quiet.

  2. 2
    AaronS1978 says:

    Well Jerry Coyne
    A simple wiki search my small minded friend on Jesus Christ and the first couple of sentences read that MAJORITY OF HISTORIANS OF ANTIQUITY THINK JESUS WAS A REAL PERSON.

    People that study history as their profession
    Archaeologists and other historians

    People that are far more qualified on the subject and you will ever be

    I hate to burst your little atheist bubble but Jesus did exist

    You are entitled to your beliefs but don’t act like they’re actually fact

    Now if you wanna debate about his divinity that’s an entirely different subject

    But Jesus was very much a real person you cross eyed dip shit

Leave a Reply