From Douglas Axe’s Undeniable,
Only a very few research scientists have the opportunity to work against that disjointed view by openly studying life as something clearly and cleverly designed. I am one and can count the others on my fingers. There re more wwho would like to have this opportunity, as shown every now and then by a paper that gets past the policing system of an establishment science journal. A recent example isa description of the architecture of the human hand as being “the proper design by the Creator t perform multitude of daily tasks in a comfortable way.” Infractions like this always ” almost always bring a reprimand. Everyone must decide for himself or herself what they can do under the shadow of the materialist flag, knowing that if they press too hard they may lose even the small opportunities they once had.
Real case histories bear this out, time and again. Two months after this paper on the human hand was published, it was retracted—not by the authors but by the journal ( PloS One), and not for any technical error that could be described but because of “concerns with the scientific rationale, presentation, and language.” (p. 265)
Everyone really knows that if the authors had ended with a fatuous endorsement of Darwin and naturalist atheism, that would have been okay. Darwin is a free frontal lobotomy that comes with a tenure plan. What else did you want to know?
We choose to fund this.
See also: Doug Axe presents his thesis
Follow UD News at Twitter!
In AA denial of the way things really are is seen as a form of insanity that prevents recovery. i.e. Denialism. Thus, the institutional denialism seen in peer review of the apparent design seen in life is a form of insanity imposed at the institutional peer review level of science.
Jonathan Wells, Ann Gauger, and Philip Skell, lay out how this insanity in peer review works out:
Darwinian ‘science’ in a nutshell:
It is interesting to note that underneath the insane ‘narrative gloss’ that Darwinists artificially impose on the peer review literature that they still, none-the-less, cannot rid themselves of ‘design language’ underneath it all:
Conversations with Douglas Axe: Where Did Darwin Go Wrong? – video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLR8eQzfCOiS3-MQT4SEaLNloU5v2poZKf&v=kMEjaSmTkkc
“Only a very few research scientists have the opportunity to work against that disjointed view by openly studying life as something clearly and cleverly designed. I am one and can count the others on my fingers.”
Hmmmm… How is this possible in the 21st century that a small group of people, lets say 1% of the human population, has gained so much power?
How is it possible that 99% of the rest of the human population have to pay for this nonsense research and have to accept the results rigged before the research or studies are done?
How does this nonsense “science” ends up published in so-called “scientific journals”, so the majority of the 99% of human society would think it is the “truth”…
How did it end up like that? Who created a system that promotes lies and why would anybody in the right frame of mind promote it?
Does anybody have any ideas?
I think I might get one or two from someone I trust in these matters….
Here is the first idea I had forgotten about…
If you don’t know what the problem is (meaning the reason (s) for human actions that are inconceivable) follow the money… Greed often wins…or a decision between being a well paid scientist or not having a “prestigious job”…