Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Excerpt from: “There is a God, How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind”

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Anthony Flew writes:

I now believe that the universe was brought into existence by an infinite Intelligence. I believe that this Universe’s intricate laws manifest what scientists have called the Mind of God.  I believe that life and reproduction originate in a divine Source.

Why do I believe this, given that I expounded and defended atheism for more than half a century? The short answer is this: this is the world picture, as I see it, that has emerged from modern science.  Science spotlights three dimensions of nature that point to God.  The first is the fact that nature obeys laws.  The second is the dimension of life, of intelligently organized and purpose-driven beings, which arose from matter. The third is the very existence of nature.

When I finally came to recognize the existence of a God, it was not a paradigm shift, because my paradigm remains, as Plato in his Republic scripted his Socrates to insist: “We must follow the argument wherever it leads.”

The leaders of science over the last hundred years, along with some of today’s most influential scientists, have built a philosophically compelling vision of a rational universe that sprang from a divine Mind.  As it happens, this is the particular view of the world that I now find to be the soundest philosophical explanation….

Anthony Flew, “There is a God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind,” (New York: Harper One, 2007).

The evidence that convinced “the world’s most notorious atheist” that God’s creative activity gave rise to the universe and life is the same evidence that Uncommon Descent has repeatedly presented from ongoing research findings across the scientific disciplines. What more could be said?

Comments
Querius/10 Merry Christmas to you as well....chuckdarwin
December 25, 2022
December
12
Dec
25
25
2022
06:12 AM
6
06
12
AM
PDT
It's fun to skip past Seversky and Chuckdarwinram
December 25, 2022
December
12
Dec
25
25
2022
05:10 AM
5
05
10
AM
PDT
Flew noted that he came to belief in God by following the argument, and/or scientific evidence, where it leads. Seversky, via his deep personal animosity towards Christianity, was quick to reply that, although Flew may have come to belief in God, it was some form of Deism, and was not the personal God of Christianity. But be that as it may, Flew listed three lines of scientific evidence that drove him to belief in God. 1. The Laws of nature, 2. Purpose driven life, 3. The very existence of nature. Out of these three lines of scientific evidence, Seversky only touched upon the existence of nature. Moreover, in the one line of evidence he addressed, Seversky did not even dispute the fact that the universe had a beginning, Seversky only argued that it MIGHT not have been God that preexisted the existence of the entire universe. To call Seversky supposed rebuttal of Flew's 3 lines of scientific evidence for believing in God 'lacking' is an understatement. Seversky left two lines of Flew's scientific evidence completely unaddressed, and in the one line of scientific evidence that he did address, Seversky acted as if his mere hint that something other than God MIGHT have preceded the universe was enough, in and of itself, to refute the fact that God is, by far, the best explanation, out of all possible explanations, for the existence of the universe. (see Stephen Meyer, "Return of the God Hypothesis"), In short, Seversky, because of his deep animosity towards God in general, and Christianity in particular, would much rather follow his completely unsubstantiated imagination wherever it leads rather than ever following the scientific evidence, like Flew did, to where it leads. Which is, sadly, par for the course with atheists. Instead of ever following the scientific evidence where it leads, atheists constantly use unsubstantiated imagination, imaginary conjectures, and/or illusions, as an explanatory principle in their worldview.
Illusion - noun - A conception or image created by the imagination and having no objective reality.
Here are a few examples of atheists substituting imaginary conjectures, and/or illusions, in place of any real, substantiating, scientific evidence. What is the origin of the fine-tuning of the universe? Atheists: Well, you see, the universe is not really fine-tuned, it is only the illusion of fine-tuning since we can imagine an infinity of other universes that were not fine-tuned for life. What is the origin of 'purpose-driven' life? Atheists: Well, you see, life is not really 'purpose-driven, it is only the illusion of 'purpose-driven' life, since we can imagine that purpose can somehow, magically, arise from completely purposeless chaos. What is the origin of my first person subjective experience of "I"? Atheists: Well, you see, you do not really objectively exist as a real person, as an "I", but you are merely a 'neuronal illusion' generated by your brain, since we can imagine that matter can somehow, magically, generate the first-person conscious experience of "I". What is the origin of my free will? i.e. My willing to do something and then doing it? Atheists: Well, you see, you don't really have free will, and you don't really do anything of your own accord, since we can imagine that particles can somehow, magically, generate the illusion of free will. i.e. Generate the illusion that you are in control of what you do. What is the origin of the reliability of my beliefs?, i.e. That I know certain things to be true, and certain things to be false? Atheists: Well, you see, you don't really have reliable beliefs, and you are only under the illusion that your beliefs are reliable, since we imagine that our beliefs were selected for survival value, not for truth value. What is the origin of the reliability of my perceptions? My ability to make accurate perceptions about the world? Atheists: Well, you see, you don't really have accurate perceptions of reality since we can imagine that our perceptions of reality are only "constructed representations" of the material brain. What is the origin of the overwhelmingly apparent design of life? Atheists: Well, you see, life, despite all appearances, is not really designed because we can imagine that the 'designer substitute' of Natural Selection can somehow, magically, produce the overwhelming illusion of design. What is the origin of meaning and purpose for my life? Atheists: Well, you see, there is no real meaning and purpose for your life since we can imagine illusory meanings and purposes for ours lives, minus any belief in God, that can somehow, magically, serve as stand-ins for real meanings and purposes for our lives. What is the origin of beauty in the world? Atheists: Well, you see, there is no real beauty in the world since we can imagine that our perception of beauty in the world is merely an illusion that was somehow, magically, created to give our lives some semblance of illusory meaning and purpose. What is the origin of morality in the world? Atheists: Well, you see, morality does not objectively exist either since we can imagine that we can create an illusory, and subjective, system of morality that is somehow, magically, binding for all people. Thus in conclusion, and in a shining example of poetic justice, if God is not real for the atheist, then everything else else in the atheist's worldview, including the atheist himself, becomes imaginary and illusory. Verses:
2 Corinthians 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
Merry Christmas!
John 3:16 "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life."
bornagain77
December 25, 2022
December
12
Dec
25
25
2022
03:22 AM
3
03
22
AM
PDT
It’s funny to see how, stereotypically, the atheists on this site come running in to attempt to diminish the significance of his conversion by attacking the notoriety of the individual. Bravo, for never letting me down.AaronS1978
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
11:40 PM
11
11
40
PM
PDT
consigning the lion’s share of those beings to eternal damnation? Could be it's only the wilfully blind?es58
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
11:01 PM
11
11
01
PM
PDT
Chuckdarwin @9, Why would you think that the Creator does things out of "need"? Do you know any humans who do things out of love or out of creativity? Do you know of any humans who are working on AI to try to create entities that can operate independently, fully knowing that their human creator might need to step in at some point? In your experience, do you know of creative humans who try to repair or enhance their creations? Uncoerced human creativity is accompanied with love, joy, and delight, accepting of the risk of failure and the challenge of making something better. And if something breaks beyond repair, do humans consign it to the eternal damnation of the dustbin with any pleasure? The choice is always yours to make. Hope you have a wonderful Christmas with your family. -QQuerius
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
04:52 PM
4
04
52
PM
PDT
Querius While you are on the topic of “whys,” why would a perfect, eternal and transcendent being have the need to create lesser, imperfect beings, knowing full well that he or she or it would be consigning the lion’s share of those beings to eternal damnation? Seems pointless to me………chuckdarwin
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
02:29 PM
2
02
29
PM
PDT
Tammy Lee Haines @5,
Unanswered? Well, not quite. It’s been answered for thousands of years. Here’s the answer. God He has existed forever. He is outside of space and time. Being omnipotent, He can make a universe out of nothing., just by willing it, Like He did 13.8 billion years ago, at the start of space and time. For Him, it’s a piece of cake.
Well said and my thoughts exactly! No mystery. What people unfamiliar with relativistic physics usually forget is that space-time is one thing as is mass-energy. Thus, the appearance of our universe from non-existence must of necessity have been the starting point for mass, energy, space AND TIME. Why is it so hard for some people to grasp that the Creator of space and time is outside of space and time? And why is it so hard for some people to grasp that the Creator of mass and energy is not composed of mass and energy? Moses asked the Creator for a name that he could reference. And what Moses was told was simply I AM WHO I AM (or I AM for short). This in itself is profound and revealing. -QQuerius
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
01:55 PM
1
01
55
PM
PDT
Seversky at 2, I have seen the same falsehoods repeated about the Founding Fathers over and over. Deism? No. Jefferson Memorial Northeast Portico "God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever. Commerce between master and slave is despotism. Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Establish the law for educating the common people. This it is the business of the state to effect and on a general plan." -Excerpted from multiple sources: "A Summary View of the Rights of British America," "Notes on the State of Virginia," "The Autobiography," letter to George Wythe (1790), letter to George Washington (1786)."relatd
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
01:22 PM
1
01
22
PM
PDT
The most notorious atheist? Hardly. If I had to cast a vote for "most notorious atheist", I'd say Salman Rushdie.PyrrhoManiac1
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
11:36 AM
11
11
36
AM
PDT
Guys, did you see this question from one of our poor friends? Talk about clueless! Here's teh question: "I think we all agree that we cannot get something from literally nothing and this would be presumably true even of an omnipotent being like God. That means that something – whatever it might be – must always have existed and preceded the start of our 13.8bn year-old Universe. The unanswered question is what." Unanswered? Well, not quite. It's been answered for thousands of years. Here's the answer. God He has existed forever. He is outside of space and time. Being omnipotent, He can make a universe out of nothing., just by willing it, Like He did 13.8 billion years ago, at the start of space and time. For Him, it's a piece of cake. Anyhow, your not knowing it, dont feel bad. Not your fault. You got gyped by the schools you went to. I bet they were taught by Atheists spreading propaganda. Kind of like they did in the Soviet Union. Maybe you could sue them, if they didnt take off in the middle of the night with all your dough. .TAMMIE LEE HAYNES
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
11:19 AM
11
11
19
AM
PDT
SG You hadn't heard of him because, although he came out of the British analytic tradition, his work focused on the philosophy of religion which was considered a philosophical backwater through most of the 20th century. His later notoriety came almost exclusively as a result of his very public "conversion" from atheism to deism somewhere around 2004. It made him somewhat of a cause celebre with the apologist crowd...chuckdarwin
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
09:13 AM
9
09
13
AM
PDT
I had never even heard of him. Can’t be that “notorious.”Sir Giles
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
08:40 AM
8
08
40
AM
PDT
Why would a man who had spent his life as an atheist suddenly change his mind? He must have already been familiar with the arguments for the existence of a God. Apparently, he consulted an Orthodox Jewish physicist call Gerard Schroeder who espouses controversial views about how the creation myth in Genesis can be reconciled with a universe estimated to be 13.8 bn years old through the theory of relativity. Whether Flew had already been exploring paths towards some form of belief in a God and Schroeder's views provided him with a scientific straw to grasp is unclear. Neither did Flew convert to one of the orthodox forms of Christianity. Rather, it is suggested his beliefs became more akin to the deism of Thomas Jefferson. I think we all agree that we cannot get something from literally nothing and this would be presumably true even of an omnipotent being like God. That means that something - whatever it might be - must always have existed and preceded the start of our 13.8bn year-old Universe. The unanswered question is what.Seversky
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
07:11 AM
7
07
11
AM
PDT
Any who seriously considers what Anthony Flew did must come to the same conclusion as he did. God does exist. The laws of physics require nature to follow the laws that govern the universe without exception. All life has purpose that did not come about randomly. Everything from the single-celled organism to the most complex shows design. The existence of nature could not have come about through chance, but must have had a beginning. All matter has a beginning, which means God created the first matter that could not have come about randomly. Something cannot come from nothing.BobRyan
December 24, 2022
December
12
Dec
24
24
2022
02:12 AM
2
02
12
AM
PDT
1 2 3

Leave a Reply