Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Extraterrestrial civilizations: Have we tried looking for their city lights yet?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
Montreal (available as wallpaper)

From “City Lights Could Reveal E.T. Civilization” (ScienceDaily, Nov. 3, 2011), we learn:

In the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, astronomers have hunted for radio signals and ultra-short laser pulses. In a new paper, Avi Loeb (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics) and Edwin Turner (Princeton University) suggest a new technique for finding aliens: look for their city lights. “Looking for alien cities would be a long shot, but wouldn’t require extra resources. And if we succeed, it would change our perception of our place in the universe,” said Loeb.

Yes! Just think! Someone else to blame for electricity waste, as in “THEY is worse than Us.”

As with other SETI methods, they rely on the assumption that aliens would use Earth-like technologies. This is reasonable because any intelligent life that evolved in the light from its nearest star is likely to have artificial illumination that switches on during the hours of darkness.

Unless, of course, eyes never evolved on that planet …

In that context, see this story by H. G.Wells, about a sighted man who thought he could rule over a society in which everyone else was blind. It didn’t work out because the society was adapted to sightlessness and people assumed he was delusional when he claimed to “see” stuff – just like Madame Baloney claims to “see” the future.

Hey look, it’s Saturday morning, folks. Serious science news later.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
SETI has long been touted as a textbook example of 'design inferences' in action. It appears in practically every popular ID treatment. Even the infamous Of Pandas and People states;
Today we recognize that appeals to intelligent design may be considered in science, as illustrated by current NASA search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI).
If SETI isn't 'serious' science then where does that leave ID?Single_Malt
November 5, 2011
November
11
Nov
5
05
2011
07:48 AM
7
07
48
AM
PDT
Stu7, let's think what we are thinking here: 'Why is it not science? Perhaps not serious science;' How about we apply the same thin king to other areas of life: Why is it not religion? Perhaps not serious religion; or Why is it not politics? Perhaps not serious politics; or Why is it not medicine? Perhaps not serious medicine? Do you see the problem? We are perfectly happy to consider astrobiology as entertainment, and we have covered that entertainment beat here pretty regularly. If it isn't serious science, it isn't science. Perhaps it is serious entertainment. No problem with that, as long as it's clear.News
November 5, 2011
November
11
Nov
5
05
2011
07:15 AM
7
07
15
AM
PDT
tjguy: "I don’t see how anyone can call it science." ==== It's actually a faith of it's own as an extension of another FAITH based on Evolutionism. If that Dogma was never invented by an angry bitter old man, would such science fictional searchings be around today ??? I highly doubt it.Eocene
November 5, 2011
November
11
Nov
5
05
2011
06:01 AM
6
06
01
AM
PDT
Why is it not science? Perhaps not serious science; but I would think attempts at detecting electromagnetic waves exhibiting complex, specific, repeatable patterns indicating design would count as a science of sorts.Stu7
November 5, 2011
November
11
Nov
5
05
2011
06:00 AM
6
06
00
AM
PDT
tjguy, the thing is, they DO! It would be a very interesting sociology of science study to determine why this stuff is considered science. Whereas if Mike Behe writes a carefully researched book on the edge of evolution - the limitations of natural selection beyond a certain number of point mutations - that's not science or else it's anti-science. Therein lies a huge number of unspoken cultural assumptions that are not in any meaningful sense science.News
November 5, 2011
November
11
Nov
5
05
2011
05:12 AM
5
05
12
AM
PDT
You are right in saying that SETI is NOT serious science stuff - if it even qualifies as science at all. In fact, I don't think it does. I don't see how anyone can call it science.tjguy
November 5, 2011
November
11
Nov
5
05
2011
04:50 AM
4
04
50
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply