Get Rid of Evolution With This One Weird Trick

_{Cornelius Hunter

December 22, 2015

Intelligent Design}

Share: Facebook; Twitter; LinkedIn; Flipboard; Print; Email

People have been begging me to tell them about this one weird trick to get rid of evolution. But up until now I have been hesitant. It’s almost too easy. Plus, getting rid of evolution would mean not having evolutionists around anymore, and what fun would that be? But now, for a limited time, you too can get rid of evolution with read more

Comments

“A mimic octopus. What a fitting example for the theory of evolution!" Yes. Like the octopus, Darwinian evolution depends on plenty of suckers...anthropic_{December 22, 2015
December
12
Dec
22
22
2015
11:28 PM
11
11
28
PM
PDT}

Oh imagine the steps needed to evolve just before getting it right. What is halfway of this critter? Its really cool eh. Its probable human colour change has its origins in the thing that change this creature. The thresholds are different that must be crossed before the body changes but the same equation probably.Robert Byers_{December 22, 2015
December
12
Dec
22
22
2015
07:08 PM
7
07
08
PM
PDT}

Bornagain, "A mimic octopus. What a fitting example for the theory of evolution! A supposed scientific theory that morphs into whatever shape it needs to in order to avoid falsification by contradictory evidence" I did not understand Dr. Hunter on this one. Now I do.bFast_{December 22, 2015
December
12
Dec
22
22
2015
01:59 PM
1
01
59
PM
PDT}

A mimic octopus. What a fitting example for the theory of evolution! A supposed scientific theory that morphs into whatever shape it needs to in order to avoid falsification by contradictory evidence:
Who would have thought that it would be biologists that came up with the first Theory of Everything? Biological divergence? Evolution. Biological convergence? Evolution. Gradual variation? Evolution. Sudden variation? Evolution. Stasis? Evolution. Junk DNA? Evolution. No Junk DNA? Evolution. Tree of life? Evolution. No tree of life? Evolution. Common genes? Evolution. Orfan genes? evolution. Cell with little more than a jelly-like protoplasm? Evolution. Cell filled with countless, highly-specified nano-machines directed by a software code? Evolution. More hardy, more procreative organisms? Evolution. Less hardy, less procreative organisms? Evolution. - Evolution explains everything. - William J Murray "Being an evolutionist means there is no bad news. If new species appear abruptly in the fossil record, that just means evolution operates in spurts. If species then persist for eons with little modification, that just means evolution takes long breaks. If clever mechanisms are discovered in biology, that just means evolution is smarter than we imagined. If strikingly similar designs are found in distant species, that just means evolution repeats itself. If significant differences are found in allied species, that just means evolution sometimes introduces new designs rapidly. If no likely mechanism can be found for the large-scale change evolution requires, that just means evolution is mysterious. If adaptation responds to environmental signals, that just means evolution has more foresight than was thought. If major predictions of evolution are found to be false, that just means evolution is more complex than we thought." ~ Cornelius Hunter What One Famous Scientist Said About Evolution “One morning I woke up and something had happened in the night, and it struck me that I had been working on this [evolution] stuff for twenty years and there was not one thing I knew about it. That’s quite a shock to learn that one can be so misled so long. Either there was something wrong with me or there was something wrong with evolutionary theory. Naturally, I know there is nothing wrong with me …..” “[The] question is: Can you tell me anything you KNOW about Evolution? Any one thing? Any one thing that is true? I tried that question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of Evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time, and eventually one person said, “I do know one thing – it ought not to be taught in high school”.” Part of a keynote address given at the American Museum of Natural History by Dr Colin Patterson (Senior Palaeontologist, British Museum of Natural History, London) in 1981. Unpublished transcript. http://www.unmaskingevolution.com/main.htm Nobel laureate physicist that you sure won’t read on a Darwin pressure group Web site Excerpt: Evolution by natural selection, for instance, which Charles Darwin originally conceived as a great theory, has lately come to function more as an antitheory, called upon to cover up embarrassing experimental shortcomings and legitimize findings that are at best questionable and at worst not even wrong. Your protein defies the laws of mass action? Evolution did it! Your complicated mess of chemical reactions turns into a chicken? Evolution! The human brain works on logical principles no computer can emulate? Evolution is the cause! - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel laureate – Physics - A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down (New York: Basic Books, 2005), 168-69) https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/he-said-it-here%E2%80%99s-a-statement-from-a-nobel-laureate-physicist-that-you-sure-won%E2%80%99t-read-on-a-darwin-pressure-group-web-site/ “We are told dogmatically that Evolution is an established fact; but we are never told who has established it, and by what means. We are told, often enough, that the doctrine is founded upon evidence, and that indeed this evidence ‘is henceforward above all verification, as well as being immune from any subsequent contradiction by experience;’ but we are left entirely in the dark on the crucial question wherein, precisely, this evidence consists.” Smith, Wolfgang (1988) Teilhardism and the New Religion: A Thorough Analysis of The Teachings of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
bornagain_{December 22, 2015
December
12
Dec
22
22
2015
03:15 AM
3
03
15
AM
PDT}

Isn’t this exactly what evolutionists would predict?
It's more like what evolutionists' arguments are like. They take the likeness and form of whatever facts surround them, until you call them out. Then they dash off to some other place in the discussion and pretend to be truth.awstar_{December 22, 2015
December
12
Dec
22
22
2015
02:28 AM
2
02
28
AM
PDT}

Sorry. I don't get it. How does this get rid of evolution? Isn't this exactly what evolutionists would predict?paul sussman_{December 21, 2015
December
12
Dec
21
21
2015
10:37 PM
10
10
37
PM
PDT}

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Leave a Reply