In Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution the engine of progress is death. Nature is one big Malthusian battlefield as natural selection kills off the less-fit designs. As David Hume had put it a century before, “A perpetual war is kindled amongst all living creatures,” and nature is so arranged so as “to embitter the life of every living being.” In Darwin’s day Alfred, Lord Tennyson found that nature was “red in tooth and claw” and Herbert Spencer summarized Darwin’s new theory as the “Survival of the Fittest.” Or as Nietzsche lamented, it is the weak “who most undermine life.” But there’s only one problem: this is all the result of junk science. For every Serengeti Plain there are untold stories of mutualism and cooperation between species which contradict one of evolution’s most fundamental predictions. All of this came to light once again in a massive evolutionary study of algae. Read more
23 Replies to “Here’s That Algae Study That Decouples Phylogeny and Competition”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Of related note, while learning, from Dr. Behe in the ‘Edge Of Evolution’, that HIV is a ‘mutational powerhouse’ which greatly outclasses the ‘mutational firepower’ of the entire spectrum of higher life-forms combined for millions of years, and about the devastating effect HIV has on humans with just one trivial binding site being generated by the Random Variation – Natural Selection process, I realized if evolution were actually the truth for how all life came to be on Earth then the only ‘life’ that would be around would be extremely small organisms with the highest replication rate, and with the most mutational firepower, since only they would be the fittest to survive in the dog eat dog world where blind pitiless evolution rules and only the ‘fittest’ are allowed to survive. The logic of this is nicely summed up here:
i.e. Since successful reproduction is all that really matters on a neo-Darwinian view of things, how can anything but successful reproduction be realistically ‘selected’ for? Any other function besides reproduction, such as sight, hearing, thinking, etc.., would be highly superfluous to the primary criteria of successfully reproducing, and should, on a Darwinian view, be discarded as so much excess baggage since it would slow down successful reproduction. But, as the study Dr. Hunter highlighted clearly illustrates, that is not what we find:
Indeed, instead of eating us, time after time we find these different types of microbial life to be helping us in essential ways that have nothing to do with their ability to successfully reproduce,,,
Music:
Thrive – Casting Crowns
lyric: “It’s time for us to more than just survive
We were made to thrive”
http://myktis.com/songs/thrive/
“In Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution the engine of progress is death.”
Since the first sentence of the article is wrong, I become sceptical about the conclusions drawn from this. The engine of change (not progress) in evolution is reproduction (not death).
But a reading of the actual research provides more information.
“On average, species’ population sizes (cell densities) were reduced by 41% when grown in the presence of a second species”. So competition was observed, it just didn’t appear to be correlated with relatedness. The article linked above implies that this was a prediction made by evolution when, in fact, it wasn’t. Darwin postulated that the more closely related two species were, the stronger the competition would be between them. His idea was based on the observation that invasive species tended to spread quickly with little competition. It was not developed as a formal hypothesis (not theory) until 1967 (Limiting Similarity Hypothesis). It should also be noted that these experiments did not include any predators, and nutrients were continually added, so an extrapolation to the wild would be very questionable.
Don’t ring the death knell for evolution yet.
Acartia_bogart you state:
“Don’t ring the death knell for evolution yet”
Acartia_bogart although I have heard of Darwinism being called the ‘zombie’ of scientific theories since it refuses to die a normal death, what do you personally think would ‘ring the death knell for evolution’? i.e. what would falsify Darwinism? I’ve asked you before and you refused to accept the falsification even though it was falsified by the criteria that you yourself laid out!
,,,Although Darwinism is notorious for making up ‘epicycles’ to avoid falsification, since it has no rigid mathematical basis in which to falsify it in the first place (Lakatos), none-the-less, there is a way to empirically falsify Darwinism.
The empirical falsification of Darwinism is as such. Darwinian presuppositions hold that information, (and even consciousness), is merely an ‘emergent’ property of a material basis, but it is now found that material reduces to an information basis:
First, in explaining the empirical falsification of Darwinism, it is important to learn that ‘non-local’, beyond space and time, quantum entanglement (A. Aspect, A. Zeilinger) can be used as a ‘quantum information channel’,,,
And by using this ‘non-local’, beyond space and time, ‘quantum information channel’ of entanglement, physicists have reduced both matter and energy to quantum information.
In fact an entire human can, theoretically, be reduced to quantum information and teleported to another location in the universe:
Thus not only is information not reducible to a energy-matter basis, as is presupposed in Darwinism, but in actuality both energy and matter reduce to a information basis as is presupposed in Christian Theism (John1:1).
Moreover, this ‘spooky’ non-local quantum information, though at first thought to be impossible to maintain in ‘hot and noisy’ cells, is now found in molecular biology on a massive scale, in every DNA and protein molecule:
That quantum entanglement, which conclusively demonstrates that ‘information’ in its pure ‘quantum form’ is completely transcendent of any time and space constraints (Bell Aspect, Leggett, Zeilinger), should be found in molecular biology on such a massive scale is a direct empirical falsification of Darwinian claims, for how can the quantum entanglement ‘effect’ in biology possibly be explained by a material (matter/energy) ’cause’ when the quantum entanglement ‘effect’ falsified material particles as its own causation in the first place? Appealing to the probability of various configurations of material particles, as Darwinism does, simply will not help since a timeless/spaceless cause must be supplied which is beyond the capacity of the material particles themselves to supply!
In other words, to give a coherent explanation for an effect that is shown to be completely independent of any time and space constraints one is forced to appeal to a cause that is itself not limited to time and space! i.e. Put more simply, you cannot explain a effect by a cause that has been falsified by the very same effect you are seeking to explain! Improbability arguments of various ‘special’ configurations of material particles, which have been a staple of the arguments against neo-Darwinism, simply do not apply since the cause is not within the material particles in the first place!
Or related note, encoded ‘classical’ digital information, such as what William Dembski and Robert Marks demonstrated the conservation of,
,,i.e. classical ‘digital’ information, such as what we find encoded in computer programs, and yes, as we find encoded in DNA,
,,classical ‘digital’ information is found to be a subset of ‘non-local’ (i.e. beyond space and time) quantum entanglement/information by the following method:
,,,And here is evidence that quantum information is in fact ‘conserved’;,,,
Besides providing direct empirical falsification of neo-Darwinian claims as to the generation of information, the implication of finding ‘non-local’, beyond space and time, and ‘conserved’ quantum information in molecular biology on a massive scale is fairly, and pleasantly, obvious:
Verse and Music:
OT: Jim Tour on “The Importance of the Scriptures” – video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cZvpBe9QDg
The Christian Darwinist see the engine of Human Evolution as death. And the epitome of death is Jesus on the Cross.
Christian Darwinists have a more complete view than non-Christian ones.
Although a Hindu Darwinist, with their concept of reincarnation, may have a more complete view of Evolution than the Christian Darwinist.
Hindu Darwinists can explain meek algae better than the others;)
Hindu Darwinist to Atheist Darwinist:
“Better luck next time fella. If you come back as algae, remember, feel the Love. Heck, who knows – maybe you’ll rate as a Bonobo”
BA77: my life is too short to read through all this crap. Can you provide a summary?
ab, Darwinism is falsified empirically since material, via quantum teleportation, is shown to reduce to information. i.e. Information does not reduce to material as Darwinism holds.
BA67: wtf????
No.
At least read wikipedia:
“Single atoms have been teleported,[1][2][3] although not in the science-fiction sense. An atom consists of several parts: the qubits in the electronic state or electron shells surrounding the atomic nucleus, the qubits in the nucleus itself, and, finally, the electrons, protons and neutrons making up the atom. Physicists have teleported the qubits encoded in the electronic state of atoms; they have not teleported the nuclear state, nor the nucleus itself. Thus, performing this kind of teleportation requires a stock of atoms at the receiving site, available for having qubits imprinted on them. The importance of teleporting nuclear state is unclear: nuclear state does affect the atom, e.g. in hyperfine splitting, but whether such state would need to be teleported in some futuristic “practical” application is debatable.”
so what? Did you forget that atoms reduce to energy?
Quantum Teleportation – IBM Research Page
Excerpt: “it would destroy the original (photon) in the process,,”
http://researcher.ibm.com/view_project.php?id=2862
Researchers Succeed in Quantum Teleportation of Light Waves – April 2011
Excerpt: In this experiment, researchers in Australia and Japan were able to transfer quantum information from one place to another without having to physically move it. It was destroyed in one place and instantly resurrected in another, “alive” again and unchanged. This is a major advance, as previous teleportation experiments were either very slow or caused some information to be lost.
http://www.popsci.com/technolo.....-computing
Unconditional Quantum Teleportation – abstract
Excerpt: This is the first realization of unconditional quantum teleportation where every state entering the device is actually teleported,,
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/.....2/5389/706
“At the most fundamental level, the laws of physics say you are immortal. ”
http://discovermagazine.com/20.....eportation
Matter is made reducible to energy,,
Big Bang
After its (The Big Bangs) initial expansion from a singularity, the Universe cooled sufficiently to allow energy to be converted into various subatomic particles, including protons, neutrons, and electrons.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
And teleportation of a photon energy is ‘complete’ in that a photon in completely destroyed when it reduced to quantum information and teleported:
How Teleportation Will Work –
Excerpt: In 1993, the idea of teleportation moved out of the realm of science fiction and into the world of theoretical possibility. It was then that physicist Charles Bennett and a team of researchers at IBM confirmed that quantum teleportation was possible, but only if the original object being teleported was destroyed. — As predicted, the original photon no longer existed once the replica was made.
http://science.howstuffworks.c.....ation1.htm
Thus the claim that matter and energy are both reducible to quantum information is correct with the caveat that only energy has a direct, complete, reduction to information accessible to it..
correction,, Matter is reducible to energy,,
ppolish cool article, and right on time, that last paragraph is a keeper:
Will Human Teleportation Ever Be Possible?
As experiments in relocating particles advance, will we be able to say, “Beam me up, Scotty” one day soon?
By Corey S. Powell|Monday, June 16, 2014
Excerpt: Note a fascinating common thread through all these possibilities. Whether you regard yourself as a pile of atoms, a DNA sequence, a series of sensory inputs or an elaborate computer file, in all of these interpretations you are nothing but a stack of data. According to the principle of unitarity, quantum information is never lost. Put them together, and those two statements lead to a staggering corollary: At the most fundamental level, the laws of physics say you are immortal.
http://discovermagazine.com/20.....eportation
BA77, wasn’t this known back when e=mc2 was proposed? And what does it have to do with competition amongst algae?
ab as to:
‘what does it have to do with competition amongst algae?’
Nothing, it has to do with the empirical falsification of Neo-Darwinism.
as to
‘wasn’t this known back when e=mc2 was proposed?’
No, you only have one half of the piece of the puzzle with e=mc2. e=mc2 only let’s you know that mass reduces to energy, (and that mass can be created from energy), but e=mc2 does not tell you where the where and what the energy originally came from in the big bang. Yet quantum teleportation, since a photon of energy is complexly reduced to quantum information in teleportation experiments, let’s you know that energy came from quantum information. Moreover, there a few more characteristics we can glean about photons from quantum mechanics. For instance, a ‘un-collapsed’ photon, in its quantum wave state, is mathematically defined as ‘infinite’ information:
Wave function
Excerpt “wave functions form an abstract vector space”,,, This vector space is infinite-dimensional, because there is no finite set of functions which can be added together in various combinations to create every possible function. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W.....ctor_space
Explaining Information Transfer in Quantum Teleportation: Armond Duwell †‡ University of Pittsburgh
Excerpt: In contrast to a classical bit, the description of a (photon) qubit requires an infinite amount of information. The amount of information is infinite because two real numbers are required in the expansion of the state vector of a two state quantum system (Jozsa 1997, 1) http://www.cas.umt.edu/phil/fa.....lPSA2K.pdf
Quantum Computing – Stanford Encyclopedia
Excerpt: Theoretically, a single qubit can store an infinite amount of information, yet when measured (and thus collapsing the Quantum Wave state) it yields only the classical result (0 or 1),,,
http://plato.stanford.edu/entr.....tcomp/#2.1
Thus every time we see (observe) a single photon of ‘material’ reality we are actually seeing just a single bit of information that was originally created from a very specific set of infinite information that was known by the consciousness that preceded material reality. i.e. information known only by the infinite Mind of omniscient God!
Moreover, It is important to note that the following experiment actually encoded information into a photon while it was in its quantum wave state, thus destroying the notion, held by many, that the wave function was not ‘physically real’ but was merely ‘abstract’. i.e. How can information possibly be encoded into something that is not physically real but merely abstract?
Ultra-Dense Optical Storage – on One Photon
Excerpt: Researchers at the University of Rochester have made an optics breakthrough that allows them to encode an entire image’s worth of data into a photon, slow the image down for storage, and then retrieve the image intact.,,, As a wave, it passed through all parts of the stencil at once,,,
http://www.physorg.com/news88439430.html
“By its conventional definition, a photon is one unit of excitation of a mode of the electromagnetic field. The modes of the electromagnetic field constitute a countably infinite set of basis functions, and in this sense the amount of information that can be impressed onto an individual photon is unlimited.”
Robert W. Boyd – The Enabling Technology for Quantum Information Science 2013 – University of Rochester, Rochester, NY – lead researcher of the experiment which encoded information in a photon in 2010
Single photons to soak up data:
Excerpt: the orbital angular momentum of a photon can take on an infinite number of values. Since a photon can also exist in a superposition of these states, it could – in principle – be encoded with an infinite amount of information.
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/7201
Now, I find the preceding to be absolutely fascinating! A photon, in its ‘real’ quantum wave state, is found to be mathematically defined as a ‘infinite-dimensional’ state, which requires an ‘infinite amount of information’ to describe it properly, and this infinite dimensional quantum wave can be encoded with information in its ‘infinite dimensional’ state, and this ‘infinite dimensional’ photon is found to collapse, instantaneously, and thus ‘non-locally’, to just a ’1 or 0? state, out of a infinite number of possibilities that the photon could have collapsed to instead! Moreover, consciousness is found to precede the collapse of the wavefunction to its particle state (Leggett’s Inequality). Now my question to materialistic atheists is this, “Exactly what ’cause’ has been postulated throughout history to be completely independent of any space-time constraints, as well as possessing infinite knowledge, so as to be the ‘sufficient cause’ to explain what we see in the quantum wave collapse of a photon?
John 1:1-5
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it.
this might be of interest for you ab:
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences – Eugene Wigner – 1960
Excerpt: We now have, in physics, two theories of great power and interest: the theory of quantum phenomena and the theory of relativity.,,, The two theories operate with different mathematical concepts: the four dimensional Riemann space and the infinite dimensional Hilbert space,
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~matc.....igner.html