Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Ignorance: Inspired and Promoted by Mainstream Media

Categories
Intelligent Design
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

A family friend, who is a brilliant electrical engineer, recently spent some time at our home for a holiday get-together. The topic of ID came up and he asked me how I could possibly have bought into such a silly idea. I quizzed him about what he knew about ID. I asked him about which prominent ID theorists he was familiar with, and mentioned a few, along with the titles of their books. He had never heard of any of them, and was completely unfamiliar with any ID literature or even elementary ID concepts.

As it turned out, he had gotten all of his information about ID from the mainstream media, and didn’t have the slightest clue what ID is all about.

Comments
Mapou, if you found that interesting, you will also like "The unfeeling reptilian brain" about the difference between claims for brain evolution and reality.O'Leary
January 29, 2008
January
01
Jan
29
29
2008
10:28 PM
10
10
28
PM
PST
Well, I am a software engineer and I don't know much about biology. I always suspected that Darwinism was bogus but what got me convinced is my interest in artificial intelligence and the brain. I eventually learned enough about the human brain to know that it is irreducibly complex. The way the different parts of the brain work to complement each other's function could not have evolved gradually a la Darwin. It was designed, without a doubt. Darwinism has been a hindrance to progress in neuroscience, in my opinion. As a case in point, there is a powerful group of Darwinists in the field who have been using evolution to ascribe all sorts of cognitive capabilities to the cerebellum without any solid evidence. A Darwinist couple (Henrietta and Alan Leiners) have been publishing papers since the late 80s promoting their hypothesis that the cerebellum participates in language and speech processing among other non-motor activities. They even got most neuroscientists to believe that there is a direct bi-directional link between the cerebellum and Broca's area, the speech production center of the brain. What is amazing is that there is no neuro-anatomical evidence for such a link. None. The Leiners (they're retired in their eighties now) were able to get away with their pseudoscience simply because they were smart (or devious) enough to base their hypothesis on the supposed evolution of the human cerebellum. I just recently had a chat with someone who had suffered a massive cerebellar stroke. While the stroke affected (and still affects) his motor abilities, it had no ill effect on his cognitive skills. Subsequently, he went back to school and is now working on getting his doctorate. This squarely and decisively contradicts the prevalent Darwin-inspired view in the neuroscience community that the cerebellum is involved in cognitive processing.Mapou
January 29, 2008
January
01
Jan
29
29
2008
09:14 PM
9
09
14
PM
PST
Gil, how much does this guy know about biology? I would suspect that any "brilliant" electrical engineer would line up with us software developers to voice his incredulity.bFast
January 29, 2008
January
01
Jan
29
29
2008
08:33 PM
8
08
33
PM
PST
1 2

Leave a Reply